• LAVA Moderator: Shinji Ikari

Bluelight photographers, unite!

Jaymie...lovely pictures! i'm reminded of my days in the darkroom ...I spent 90% of my junior year in the freaking darkroom! Took months of practice, and countless packs of photopaper, ruined clothes and smelling like developer before I was able to finally manipulate my black and whites to look as best as I wanted them to! My thesis was a set of photographs of my mom painting , which took a dozen rolls of film and two months of hard work.
Shutterbug thank you :D
While I do believe that its not the equipment but the artist that makes good pictures (using the same analogy that it doesnt take an expensive studio for a talented musician to create good music ) I am in awe of technology nowadays and I'm glad I sort of worked my way up the pole so to speak. Started with a camera where I had to calculate my aperture and shutter speed like clockwork , developing my own film with often disastrous results, going thru several cheap (and i mean CHEAP I never really had a good automatic camera lol ) automatics after that and so getting my first digital camera was definitely an awesome experience =D I guess I was able to appreciate it a lot MORE than if I had been gifted with it earlier, you get what I'm saying? I'll be using it for a few more years and maybe purchase one of those cameras posted here (very professional looking and Im sure to ask for bluelighters advice on this one!)
To those who prefer film to digital, I'd have to say I respectfully disagree: I'm definitely all for digital pictures. I've worked with film for a good part of my life and I just absolutely ADORE the convenience of taking digital pictures...I love being able to see what I've taken the instant I take it. And like what Chrissie said...a good picture is still a work of art, retouched or not.
The possibilities are ENDLESS with cameras now, even for those who pine for the good old days of black and white: I've taken quite a few b&w pictures with my digital camera that are just as arresting as those taken with my Pentax.

Next stop: A nice videocamera. I have a hitachi hi-8 that i used almost a decade ago...sigh...HOW ANCIENT!!! lol.
 
Nothing special...

Canon PowerShot SD500 Digital ELPH 7.1 Megapixel Digital Camera

2147-norm.gif


Resolution: 3072 x 2304
LCD Size: 2.0-inch
CCD Size: 7.3 Megapixel
Internal Memory: None
Zoom: 3.0x optical, 4.0x digital

It takes great midrange distance photos but any closeups you can forget about.
 
At the moment, I'm into animal shots... with the occasional landscape. Don't know what my camera is - some bulky Finepix digital thing. Anyway, these are some of my more recent favourites:

tarongazoo0054ji.jpg


tarongazoo031b9ap.jpg


22472103509_0_BG.jpg
 
^
Thankyou.

The Lion was at Taronga Zoo, Sydney. Took ages to get the shot, must've waited for over half an hour.

Photos are my new passion... shame I know nothing about cameras! :)
 
psychetool said:
Nothing special...

Canon PowerShot SD500 Digital ELPH 7.1 Megapixel Digital Camera

2147-norm.gif


Resolution: 3072 x 2304
LCD Size: 2.0-inch
CCD Size: 7.3 Megapixel
Internal Memory: None
Zoom: 3.0x optical, 4.0x digital

It takes great midrange distance photos but any closeups you can forget about.


I wonder what the difference is between the sd500 and sd550 ... my camera takes really good closeups. i have the 550. *off to google* lol
 
shutterbug said:
i'm a firm believer that high tech equipment doesn't equal good photographs; you can take just as good of a picture with a camera that you don't have to shell out hundreds of dollars for :) it's all about talent!

absolutley, it is the eye not the money in front of it.
actually, the only reason i have the 20D is because i won it. not that that doesnt make me incredibly happy and i really like the feel and ease of the camera - i just wasnt really planning on going high tech (big money) digital. i was happy with my little old nikon coolpix from 2001. the only reason i bought the coolpix was because it was a camera the size of my hand that i could sneak into places and carry around very easily in a purse/messenger or whatever i may have on my way out.
ive had a blast with the canon and got some amazing stuff... but really nothing compares (imo) to standing in a smelly old room licking fixer off my hands trying to grain focus on a big ol' medium format negative. that's my passion there.

my first camera (and favorite 35mm) was the nikon EM- no computers, buttons or whatnot- it was all in the eye and technical knowledge in and out of the darkroom.
my favorite camera overall was a lubitel
Lubitel166B.jpg

a russian twin lens. wonderful little thing. up there with the lomo too for fun cameras.
oh! and i love my holgas!
holga.jpg

made of plastic, held together with electrical tape (unless you like the light leaks like i do)

apprently i like low tech. easy to modify and not worry about the price of it all cameras.
and speaking of price- fine, i have the 20D- you know what a fisheye lens will set me back? upwards of 700$ for a fixed one and 2000$ for the pro. please. give me an old EM, a fish eye and some duct tape it make it all stick together
but if youre going big, big money hasselblad has a new 39MP camera and backs line- sweet
 
wanderlust said:
apprently i like low tech. easy to modify and not worry about the price of it all cameras
Wanderlust, check out the russian (well, Soviet really) Zenit series of SLR cameras. The one thing I still love about russian equipment is that if someone was just starting out in this "hobby", they could probably set themselves up with a decent SLR, a regular 50 lens, a telephoto 200 lens and darkroom equipment, all for under 300 dollars (if you shopped around). And the Zenits take decent photos to boot.
 
wanderlust said:
my first camera (and favorite 35mm) was the nikon EM- no computers, buttons or whatnot- it was all in the eye and technical knowledge in and out of the darkroom... and speaking of price- fine, i have the 20D- you know what a fisheye lens will set me back? upwards of 700$ for a fixed one and 2000$ for the pro.

you mean this one? :)
DSC01635re.JPG


and where did you find an L that's fisheye...assuming that's what you meant by pro?
 
i also love the FM. :)

ef14-28lu_586x225.jpg


Canon EF 14mm f/2.8L USM Lens w/Case.

This ultra-wide-angle lens has the shortest focal length in the L-series. Element 2 is an Aspherical lens to correct distortion. Other aberrations such as astigmatism are also corrected, resulting in ideal image quality. The lens has a fixed, petal-type hood and a gelatin filter holder at the rear.

14mm puts it in the focal lenght of a fisheye but it has image correction so not a true fisheye per say. what the correction does really is straighten the lines. the look is still there at close distance. i prefer the true fisheye drastic convex look though.
sitting pretty at between 1600 and 2000$
i played with it at the '05 PhotoExpo- fantastic, but really... it is a fun toy but (cheesy) effects rarely make a picture great if it is not to start with.
same goes for photoshop filters.
 
Last edited:
effects rarely make a picture great if it is not to start with.
yeahhh!!!
Does anybody here have a lomo camera? =D I've read about it, it seems cool, but I can get the same effects if I jiggle my hand ever so slightly when pressing the shutter =D
 
here are two photos i took last semester for a 'self portrait' project

100_2300.JPG


100_2336.JPG


i usually don't really enjoy taking pictures of ppl (for art), but i actually had fun with this one =D
 
I couldn't be arsed to seperate my gf's from mine, so, in this one, the F90 and the Yashica are mine, the Holga is hers.
90212217_cf5bd3a65f_d.jpg


This is my current fave... the Canonet QL17 GIII. Poor mans Leica :)
90212219_e5eb685250_d.jpg


The Nikon at the back right is mine, the others are hers. Could do with a dusting off too :D
90212218_1fe30c1e1a_d.jpg
 
Last edited:
Top