-
DPMC Moderators: tryptakid
Bluelight in the news
- Thread starter neverstop
- Start date
toastedpanda
Bluelighter
The author has been in contact with BL? Does that contact include BL's foot to his sack?
Wonder if he can taste that piss in his whiskey.
Wonder if he can taste that piss in his whiskey.
static_mind
Bluelighter
- Joined
- Mar 30, 2005
- Messages
- 1,379
Like he really cares what we think. He just got paid to copy and paste our words and spin a short story. Easy money.
He's probably sitting back, showing a few of his friends the comments we make, laughing at the slander while they drink some red wine.
Something alot of people don't understand is money rules. Money comes first over ethics and real news, heck thats the reason these people report the news, for money to make a living. He wouldnt't have a job if his morals came into play. And anywaash blur goins for r thesw ways 5 dollars, get out of here!!!
Money>How people feel
Money>Everything
He's probably sitting back, showing a few of his friends the comments we make, laughing at the slander while they drink some red wine.
Something alot of people don't understand is money rules. Money comes first over ethics and real news, heck thats the reason these people report the news, for money to make a living. He wouldnt't have a job if his morals came into play. And anywaash blur goins for r thesw ways 5 dollars, get out of here!!!
Money>How people feel
Money>Everything
Media and LEO attention is nothing new to websites. I am a staff member on another drug forum and once in a while we have that chill like there is a member who is a narc.
But in all honesty coming from a staff member and a regular member, who cares? The internet is a public place and should be treated as one. You wouldn't speak openly and loudly about certain things in a room full of strangers, you should treat discussions on the internet the same way. This is why pretty much all drug forums have very strict rules, to keep the LEOs off of their ass. There's nothing illegal going on at bluelight or most of the large scale drug forums, so you shouldn't worry.
This is in response to people saying this isn't the kind of attention they want.
But in all honesty coming from a staff member and a regular member, who cares? The internet is a public place and should be treated as one. You wouldn't speak openly and loudly about certain things in a room full of strangers, you should treat discussions on the internet the same way. This is why pretty much all drug forums have very strict rules, to keep the LEOs off of their ass. There's nothing illegal going on at bluelight or most of the large scale drug forums, so you shouldn't worry.
This is in response to people saying this isn't the kind of attention they want.
^oh shit I missed that, must have rolled over the posts too quickly I was wondering why no one called them on this bullshit.
Wow the only mention of the sites mission is a smarmy sarcastic blurb. Fucking yellow journalism
These fuckfaces aren't fit to lick Hunter S Thompsons bong clean much less write articles.
Wow the only mention of the sites mission is a smarmy sarcastic blurb. Fucking yellow journalism
These fuckfaces aren't fit to lick Hunter S Thompsons bong clean much less write articles.
drug_mentor
Bluelight Crew
I have to say, it annoys me more to hear this guy has been in contact with Bluelight staff and still chose to misrepresent this site in such a way. I can see how one of the brainwashed anti-drug people would get a glance at this site and draw the bullshit conclusions he does in that article.
To have actually spoken to some senior staff, whom I am sure would have accurately conveyed the purpose and intentions of this site and still choose to blatantly misrepresent us in this way is quite unethical practise and shows just how spineless and desperate for a story this man is!
To have actually spoken to some senior staff, whom I am sure would have accurately conveyed the purpose and intentions of this site and still choose to blatantly misrepresent us in this way is quite unethical practise and shows just how spineless and desperate for a story this man is!
Roger&Me
Bluelight Crew
I think the fact that Mr. Schliebs lied and misrepresented our forum is beside the point.
First and foremost, I must say, the writing just isn't very good; and if you're going to make shit up, it should at least be readable. (!)
This article is a very crude and uninteresting attempt at journalism. In all honesty, it reads like an unintelligent 5th grader's first attempt at writing a story. Therefore, I have no problem with dismissing this article as utter crap.
First and foremost, I must say, the writing just isn't very good; and if you're going to make shit up, it should at least be readable. (!)
This article is a very crude and uninteresting attempt at journalism. In all honesty, it reads like an unintelligent 5th grader's first attempt at writing a story. Therefore, I have no problem with dismissing this article as utter crap.
Lol wow, we got a celebrity on our forums! But anyways, im kind of pissed, I mean this site really has nothing to do with drug 'shopping', or sourcing. In fact your not aloud to do that and I think the admins can read all PMs so they don't really get away with it if they try.
It makes us look like a bunch of unintelligent junkies, which I can say 98% of us aren't. It just further pushes the stereotype of drug users, pathetic really. Whatever, gaurentee we get more narcs and UC cops so just don't be retarded. "187 on an undercover cop" -Snoop dogg :D
It makes us look like a bunch of unintelligent junkies, which I can say 98% of us aren't. It just further pushes the stereotype of drug users, pathetic really. Whatever, gaurentee we get more narcs and UC cops so just don't be retarded. "187 on an undercover cop" -Snoop dogg :D