Flynnal
Bluelighter
- Joined
- Aug 14, 2012
- Messages
- 939
Just thought I'd add some interesting things I found about barbiturates through a SAR engine that came up with a laundry list of interesting figures. The figures regarding acute toxicity were rather interesting. Many of the drugs considered weak or less potent actually turned out to be exceedingly toxic.
Barbiturate Toxicity:
ORAL BARBITURATES
CRITICAL INFO:
kLog mg/L: The lower the number, the higher the absolute acute toxicity of the drug.
Acute toxicity coefficient (ATC) percentage: The higher the number the higher the relative acute toxicity.
Vinylbital
kLog mg/L: -1.99
ATC percentage: 58.9%
Talbutal
kLog mg/L: -2.0
ATC percentage: 58.59%
Aprobarbital
kLog mg/L: -2.06
ATC percentage: 57.11%
Secobarbital
kLog mg/L: -2.07
ATC percentage: 56.81%
Pentobarbital
kLog mg/L: -2.11
ATC percentage: 55.79%
Secbutabarbital
kLog mg/L: -2.19
ATC percentage: 53.85%
Amobarbital
kLog mg/L: -2.25
ATC percentage: 52.29%
Phenobarbital
kLog mg/L: -2.42
ATC percentage: 47.98%
Cyclobarbital
kLog mg/L: -2.73
ATC percentage: 40.17%
Barbital
kLog mg/L: -2.89
ATC percentage: 35.96%
Most toxic barbiturate of this set:
Vinylbital
Lease toxic barbiturate of this set:
Barbital
Note: Cyclobarbital is less toxic than Phenobarbital. Strange but true since cyclobarbital is more potent than phenobarbital. But potency has nothing to do with toxicity.
I figured this would be very interesting. And the data set pretty much confirmed my suspicions that vinylbital was indeed more toxic than most barbiturates according to the documentation written by Vincent Badeaux from Saint Etienne in France, a scholar who wrote a 3-piece documentation listing a diverse range of barbiturates and their general toxicities. It wasn't until I discovered a SAR program that could analyze a molecule and give a rough idea of where the toxicity of such drug would lie.
For informational purposes only. LD50/90/99 etc information would not be provided by the SAR analysis engine for legal liability reasons. Strangely enough, this data was retreived yesterday. This morning found myself unable to access the website under some strange generic message about how it "was only accessible from the campus"...well, um, LOL. LOL indeed. They must have known I was trying to scrap SAR related toxicity data and decided to "block" my access to the service. Oh, and using a VPN plus incognito tabs DID NOT work. Still blocked - meaning that whoever put the block in seriously knew what they were doing, otherwise I'd have been able to overcome it with a VPN and an incognito mode. Oh nope, no chance of access. Have NFI why they blocked this. Maybe they thought I was a "suicidal" student...well, I do have fucking Menieres disease, so I guess there's that, and oh boy does it have HIGH suicide rate, Throw in autistic spectrum disorder and you have an absolute utter fucking nightmare. So yeah, is it really that hard to blame the service for blocking a parasuicidal Menieres disease sufferer from accessing data they could use to help end their own life? I think not.
Peruse at your leisure. There is a wealth of information revealed by that SAR analysis tool. And I MEAN a wealth of information.
Barbiturate Toxicity:
ORAL BARBITURATES
CRITICAL INFO:
kLog mg/L: The lower the number, the higher the absolute acute toxicity of the drug.
Acute toxicity coefficient (ATC) percentage: The higher the number the higher the relative acute toxicity.
Vinylbital
kLog mg/L: -1.99
ATC percentage: 58.9%
Talbutal
kLog mg/L: -2.0
ATC percentage: 58.59%
Aprobarbital
kLog mg/L: -2.06
ATC percentage: 57.11%
Secobarbital
kLog mg/L: -2.07
ATC percentage: 56.81%
Pentobarbital
kLog mg/L: -2.11
ATC percentage: 55.79%
Secbutabarbital
kLog mg/L: -2.19
ATC percentage: 53.85%
Amobarbital
kLog mg/L: -2.25
ATC percentage: 52.29%
Phenobarbital
kLog mg/L: -2.42
ATC percentage: 47.98%
Cyclobarbital
kLog mg/L: -2.73
ATC percentage: 40.17%
Barbital
kLog mg/L: -2.89
ATC percentage: 35.96%
Most toxic barbiturate of this set:
Vinylbital
Lease toxic barbiturate of this set:
Barbital
Note: Cyclobarbital is less toxic than Phenobarbital. Strange but true since cyclobarbital is more potent than phenobarbital. But potency has nothing to do with toxicity.
I figured this would be very interesting. And the data set pretty much confirmed my suspicions that vinylbital was indeed more toxic than most barbiturates according to the documentation written by Vincent Badeaux from Saint Etienne in France, a scholar who wrote a 3-piece documentation listing a diverse range of barbiturates and their general toxicities. It wasn't until I discovered a SAR program that could analyze a molecule and give a rough idea of where the toxicity of such drug would lie.
For informational purposes only. LD50/90/99 etc information would not be provided by the SAR analysis engine for legal liability reasons. Strangely enough, this data was retreived yesterday. This morning found myself unable to access the website under some strange generic message about how it "was only accessible from the campus"...well, um, LOL. LOL indeed. They must have known I was trying to scrap SAR related toxicity data and decided to "block" my access to the service. Oh, and using a VPN plus incognito tabs DID NOT work. Still blocked - meaning that whoever put the block in seriously knew what they were doing, otherwise I'd have been able to overcome it with a VPN and an incognito mode. Oh nope, no chance of access. Have NFI why they blocked this. Maybe they thought I was a "suicidal" student...well, I do have fucking Menieres disease, so I guess there's that, and oh boy does it have HIGH suicide rate, Throw in autistic spectrum disorder and you have an absolute utter fucking nightmare. So yeah, is it really that hard to blame the service for blocking a parasuicidal Menieres disease sufferer from accessing data they could use to help end their own life? I think not.
Peruse at your leisure. There is a wealth of information revealed by that SAR analysis tool. And I MEAN a wealth of information.
Last edited:
