Nagelfar
Bluelight Crew
Soren Kierkegaard postulated anxiety as a form of self created freedom imposing freedom on itself (something along the lines that infinity dividing infinity is the finite) and compared it to the dizziness experienced from standing at the edge of a precipice and staring down into it.
One has infinite freedom of will to do as one may at any situation; but becoming aware of that freedom makes one not want to squander it on the circumstances as they pass; and then in so grasping for it, one is limited indefinitely from anything; but freely limited as imposed by your own free will upon your infinite potential for freedom in an attempt at preservation of that freedom. Such free retention by will of your freedom for action effectively makes both more unfree than simply acting and moving on to a new state of infinite freedom for action; because of the belief that you could make yourself less free by exercising your freedom.
Therefore, we love our anxiety and so pursue it ourselves as the symbol of our eternalized freedom of that moment. He compared it to Christian sin; something that the consequences of which we don't want, and the consequences of which we understand from the onset, but engage in of our own free will regardless.
Any further insights or critiques?
One has infinite freedom of will to do as one may at any situation; but becoming aware of that freedom makes one not want to squander it on the circumstances as they pass; and then in so grasping for it, one is limited indefinitely from anything; but freely limited as imposed by your own free will upon your infinite potential for freedom in an attempt at preservation of that freedom. Such free retention by will of your freedom for action effectively makes both more unfree than simply acting and moving on to a new state of infinite freedom for action; because of the belief that you could make yourself less free by exercising your freedom.
Therefore, we love our anxiety and so pursue it ourselves as the symbol of our eternalized freedom of that moment. He compared it to Christian sin; something that the consequences of which we don't want, and the consequences of which we understand from the onset, but engage in of our own free will regardless.
Any further insights or critiques?
Last edited: