• Current Events & Politics
    Welcome Guest
    Please read before posting:
    Forum Guidelines Bluelight Rules
  • Current Events & Politics Moderators: deficiT | tryptakid | Foreigner

ALTERNATIVE THEORIES V: The Build-a-bear Workshop

panic in paradise said:
You have to search for information like that. It isn't easy for most people to find excellent amphetamines, for example, if that is not their "normal" routine.

Seeking out sensational stories to fill your time, it becomes a habit, an addiction to the thrill of the "eureka" moment, which has the need to progress to satisfy with time/exposure. I promise if you found other interests, this stuff would become less and less realistic and relevant to you.
Click to expand...

Okay PnP, you have lost any respect I may have had for you. This is completely fraudulent of you.
I have lots of other interests. Ace Baker's acoount of 911, for example, is relevant no matter what I do. I only watched his work a few times. His explanation is relevant because it solves lots of problems with other accounts of 911. It's not because I think so, it's because it does. No matter what I choose to do, the NIST/Bzant account will never fit with reality. And nor is this "thrilling" for me. This is something that happened over 11 years ago, and I don't find talking basic engineering or physical realities too thrilling. As to this Bohemian Grove and it's occult sex shows, yeah, it's no surprise to me...and no matter what, it's weird. I don't put much thought into it, but in a democracy, I think people should take an interest in their leaders, especially when they are doing weird stuff.

I have never heard more relativistic nonsense on here before. This is not about perception. It's about hard facts and evidence.
You are launching a terrible personal attack against me by thinking I sit on the internet all day frantically searching for this stuff. Do you know how to use a search engine? Wikipedia ring a bell? I also get stuff shared to me on facebook and youtube recommends videos for me too. You obviously spend a lot of time on the net, but you are living under some sort of cyber rock.

Either add something of value on my thread or fuck off. I'm tired of Bluelight veterans goading me with personal attacks like this.
 
I disagree. Some things like gravity and electricity are in fact termed "theories," but there are lots of facts to back them up. That's the problem with NIST's theory. It's unlikley office fires created the perfect conditions to cause a perfect "progressive and global collapse" on three of the best built buildings in NYC that day. NIST's theory lacks factual realities. Ace's does not lack many, if any.

Only a tyrant would characterize free inquiry and the truth as terrorism. What good is continuing to blame Islam and Arabs for the 911 attacks if there is more than a reasonable doubt they alone brought 3 buildings down in NYC or had anything to do with it at all? Look for a thread on here about the woman who pushed an Indian man into an oncoming train because of her wrath over 911.
Look at what the war in Iraq and Afghanistan has done, yet you dare to accuse me of spreading terror?

As to the Bohemian Grove, I'd like to discuss it, not be told I shouldn't. I see no harm in free inquiry.
 
panic in paradise said:
MFR, for Petes sake you are a sensationalist and busy little weaver.
:D
Click to expand...
I get your play on words now.
Bohemian-Club-Emblem.jpg

I thought the sign was there to keep spiders out so nobody's rich pink ballsack got bitten during the festivities!
 
Escher's Waterfall said:
What makes them the "best built buildings" in New York City? What criteria are you using?
Click to expand...

I'm comparing them to shitty tenement slum apartments in Queens and Jenga blocks.

No really, they were built according to very stringent specifcations. The whole state has the most stringent building codes you will see and the codes within the city are even more stringent.
Even NIST and others will avoid trying to make any sort of argument that those were defective buildings.
 
MyFinalRest said:
No really, they were built according to very stringent specifcations. The whole state has the most stringent building codes you will see and the codes within the city are even more stringent.
Even NIST and others will avoid trying to make any sort of argument that those were defective buildings.
Click to expand...

You said "best built". Again, I must ask, why do you consider them better built than all other buildings in NYC?
 
lol... come on droppers... wtf. if i had a nickel for every time someone thought they knew me from somewhere... some people just got a common look. no conspiracy about that.

the fact is the shootings happened. a more likely conspiracy theory is some kind of CIA mind control operation took place. something like the manchurian candidate or something. i mean this kind of shit is like saying "maybe the twin towers didn't actually collapse!"
 
severely etarded said:
lol... come on droppers... wtf. if i had a nickel for every time someone thought they knew me from somewhere... some people just got a common look. no conspiracy about that.

the fact is the shootings happened. a more likely conspiracy theory is some kind of CIA mind control operation took place. something like the manchurian candidate or something. i mean this kind of shit is like saying "maybe the twin towers didn't actually collapse!"
Click to expand...

Yeah but this is a white woman. They do not often look alike JK. Its crack pot theory just throwing it out there. I will say that I said the minute Obama got elected that he wouldnt attack the 2nd amendment till his second term.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top