![]()
I found a nice screenshot of this "plane." It's almost all the way in, but there ain't no hole in the building yet. Not even a bit of damage to the building! It really is a fucking ghost plane, or more likely, a video composite.
All those poor fuckers who claim to have seen a plane...
They may have been convincing had there been no camera footage,
but with this fake ass camera footage, I have to say that doesn't mesh.
Real witness + Fake video = 911 was an inside job!
P.S. you guys love my new Bane avatar.
Why can't you refute the claims that a colony of bigfoots live on the moon?
The American government is preparing for a full-scale ground war against its own citizens, on domestic soil. They aren't stockpiling ammunition for shiggles. They haven't tested covert camps, under the old REX 84 program, then expanded and built prison facilities across the country because they simply can. These mass shootings aren't coincidence, your malevolent government is perpetuating them, so they can disarm you, and make you completely helpless to any oppression. A civil war has been on the agenda for the past 20+ years, and we are on the precipice of this event now.
You have been warned. Good night, and good luck.
No, why don't you do it and prove me wrong?Do us all a favor and hijack a plane and fly it into a building to prove us wrong.
You guys are in need of an example of an ad hom fallacy. This is a great example. Simply calling someone a buttfucking asshole is not an ad hominem attack. However, saying someone's theory is invalid because "they're on drugs" is a perfect example of the ad hom fallacy. Not that I mean to worry about such things, but its important to get the terminology straight.Your theory is invalid because you are on drugs.
quit what? honestly i have no idea what you're talking about. what apologist stuff?
find a single post of mine naming rumsfeld (in just about any context) or even talking about arab highjackers like that in all of my almost 40k posts. just one.
just because i do not agree with your no planes nonsense, it doesn't follow that i believe everything the u.s. government (or my own) says.
what was that you were saying in the relevant thread about fallacious arguments again?
Yeah. There's lots of talk about this "Sandy Hoax" shit. In addition to Sandy Hook also being home to the evil and notorious Suzanne Collins, who penned her obsession with ultra-survaivalist Social Darwinist propositions and child murder games.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ddF6UzgoPiY
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6c_6JzSqr2w
They are trying to disarm the population. Every restriction on weaponry gives the coup d'etat an advantage, from semi-autos to high capacity mags.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ku9BHOLju_k
I really love Robbie Parker's cocky bounce and smile before he gets ready to do his spiel. Nobody whose kid was murdered that day could act like that. I'd be a frozen lump of nothing lying on the ground, unable to speak.
They have also completley changed the story on the weapons used from two 9 mil handguns to the M4 rifle. The M4 at first was supposedly never used, and left in the trunk of the car.
Here's the medical examiner saying some weird things too:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JV3KYBS64R8
He's saying that ALL wounds were made by the "long rifle" and a reporter says "wasn't it left in the car?" Too many inconsistenicies = big conspiracy!
There's much more: simply visit the right hand side of you Youtube screen for more links!
I'm replaying this deck. Sandy Hook or Sandy Hoax?
What should we be paranoid about? I think it's the mainstream media that's the worst.
If Seth MacFarlane's Ted and Gangnam Style are our most popular cultural works of art, then we have a lot of shit to worry about!
What should we be paranoid about? I think it's the mainstream media that's the worst.
If Seth MacFarlane's Ted and Gangnam Style are our most popular cultural works of art, then we have a lot of shit to worry about!