• Current Events & Politics
    Welcome Guest
    Please read before posting:
    Forum Guidelines Bluelight Rules
  • Current Events & Politics Moderators: deficiT | tryptakid | Foreigner

ALTERNATIVE THEORIES V: The Build-a-bear Workshop

since we're on high velocity projectiles....
18404_10151166808377897_2002252980_n.jpg


548295_10151166817142897_769841060_n.jpg


we're all going to die!!!1111!!!!11
 
High winds exert serious lateral forces on a wide, flat, tall standing building.
Click to expand...

Obviously, unless you are claiming that an aircraft won't damage the outside of a skyscraper, the lateral forces are less than the force on a crashing 767.

They said that it was due to office fires. The plane damage was not the significant cause of collapse. It simply removed some fire-proofing material from columns.
Click to expand...

I was under the impression it claimed both - the plane weakened it, the fires weakened it further.

It's also easier to edit it in than to have 2 amateur pilots who didn't even want to learn how to land a plane
Click to expand...

Fun fact: 100% of people who can't land a plane can still crash it.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Shrooms00087 said:
It's a curious thing to see people care more about our government killing its own citizens as opposed to the government killing others at a higher frequency and more efficiently. Sounds like a waste of energy.
Click to expand...

Thanks for your concern about the mass murder of others because that's what I'm trying to stop by demonstrating that 911 was an inside job. I don't want Arabs and Muslims to be written into history as the perpetrators of a heinous crime they did not commit.

"Mohammed Atta did 911" remains to this day the number one reason why Americans want to destroy Arabs and Middle Easterners. I certainly know of no better way to intervene and end the justification of the murder of others than to demonstrate how and possibly who and possibly why 911wasaninsidejob.
 
This is soooooooooo goooooooooooooooood! Please, I know you motherfuckers aren't going to do any work at your jobs today so YOU GOT TO SEE THIS!

Seriously, the best 911 video ever made. It's part of the series from "The Key" that I posted above. It is really that fucking good.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CklJksRDl-s&feature=BFa&list=PLEA05F393EC843D80

All further stupid and not so stupid questions asked will be replied to with this link.
Then...maybe...we can start talking about aliens in Ancient Egypt.
 
Last edited:
L2R said:
since we're on high velocity projectiles....
we're all going to die!!!1111!!!!11
Click to expand...

It's not going to hit Earth in 2029, but it will be a near miss, passing under the orbit of some satellites. And it's a few hundred yards wide, not the size of Texas. We almost got hit a few years ago and that was a near miss. It will be a once and a lifetime opportunity to see an asteroid with the naked eye, but otherwise nothing to get alarmed about. And several countries have programs to find and identify asteroids that pose a hazard to Earth and there's an international scientific body to assess the risk posed by particular asteroids.
 
Last edited:
Folley said:
^ Something flying horizontally would be subject to a lot more factors than something dropping vertically. Wind resistance, air drag and humidity, hell even the spin of the Earth all effect a bullets flight path.
Click to expand...
how would wind resistance, air drag (aren't those the same thing?), humidity and the spin of the earth affect two objects the same size differently?
Folley said:
That's why my BB gun is so much more inaccurate and weaker than my .22, even though both shoot around 1000FPS
Click to expand...
is your bb gun rifled? define 'weaker'? force is a function of mass. surely a bb weighs about 1/10th of a .22 round? of course it's weaker...

alasdair
 
PriestTheyCalledHim said:
It's not going to hit Earth in 2029, but it will be a near miss, passing under the orbit of some satellites. And it's a few hundred yards wide, not the size of Texas. We almost got hit a few years ago and that was a near miss. It will be a once and a lifetime opportunity to see an asteroid with the naked eye, but otherwise nothing to get alarmed about. And several countries have programs to find and identify asteroids that pose a hazard to Earth and there's an international scientific body to assess the risk posed by particular asteroids.
Click to expand...

thanks for that. :)
 
Hey guys, don't worry. I didn't get banned over 911 posts, so there is no conspiracy here in the politics discussion. I was having a philosphical and intellectual dispute in another forum, about very different topics! So let us be inspired by the Mossad agent Todd Beamer and...
Let's Roll™
 
Last edited:
I've drastically rethought 911 evidence and explanations quite a bit here recently. Ace Baker's vids have really brought things to attention that I never really took into account before. It's really awesome to finally gain a grasp on what really happened.

I've come to really adopt the "no-planes theory" now because evidence simply doesn't indicate there was an actual crash at all.

Luckily, no matter what garbage NIST, FEMA, Zdenk Bažant, or even the often incorrect Scholars for 911Truth publish, we have the video evidence to examine. The video captured that fateful day is the best we could hope for.

Clearly, they were not dealing with standard explosives to demolish the towers. The evidence of scorched vehicles in the premise and especially the pyroclastic mushrooming cloud of super-fine dust give serious reason to re-examine theories that thermite/thermate and conventional explosives alone caused what occured. As Ace Baker points out in his vids, which I will provide links for again, the dust cloud that mushrooms against the wind flow can only be the result of tremendous heat energy.

New York got fucking nuked...by white people!

Ace Baker's featured videos 01-08 page:
http://www.youtube.com/user/CollinAlexander/featured
Go ahead and skip to video 02 and go from there, the first one is mostly introductory and replays of media coverage.
 
alasdairm said:
ok.

9/11 WTC 175 second hit slow motion 200fps

alasdair
Click to expand...

looks pretty fake to me - I've posted that same video about 3 times in the last 2 weeks already. The aircraft suffers no damage at all at impact. It effortlessly dives into the surface of a steel framed building as if it was an Olympic diver making a perfect dive into a pool of water.

I know lots of Americans out there are intimidated by Arabs and Muslims, but to deny the simple fact of physics in order to attempt a reinforcement of racist allegations that 19 Saudi and Egyptian Muslim men did this to get 72 virgins is absurd.

I don't know if you have the capacity or time to sit through this video explaining what you are seeing in your link, but I'll post it...again.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rml2TL5N8ds&feature=youtu.be

Thanks for agreeing with me ali, that slow motion video really exposes how damn fake the edit looks.
 
Last edited:
Well, if we examaine freemasonry at the surface it's easy to dismiss the bizarre rituals as ultimately meaningless and that it's just a social club for old men.

But then again, that's precisely what's wrong with it - the fact it is a clique.

It was once a groundbreaking society that sought to undo wrongs and senseless inequities created by institutions such as the Christian church. But then again, didn't the Christian church once upon a time seek to do this also.

The reality of these institutions is that what once began as progressive quickly becomes regressive and the organization ends up causing more problems than it helps solve.

At the very best, these old fuckers in their Masonry club are simply useless. At the worst, it is a boys' club allowing certain men to get awawy with various levels of crookery.
 
MFR, do you believe 9/11 was an inside job in conjunction with al-Qaeda or were they an easy scapegoat because of their plans (or alleged plans?) to fly planes into the WTC, Pentagon, WH, etc. ?

And to follow up, when do you believe these plans were made (what year, under who's presidential administration)?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top