• Current Events & Politics
    Welcome Guest
    Please read before posting:
    Forum Guidelines Bluelight Rules
  • Current Events & Politics Moderators: deficiT | tryptakid | Foreigner

ALTERNATIVE THEORIES V: The Build-a-bear Workshop

^ I've actually had Australian coke before. A guy I knew (from Perth, I believe) at my University was really into it and offered me some at a party. Then he told me that he smuggled it from Australia up his butt, after I had already done a line.

I tend to steer clear of the stuff nowadays.
 
Lolz, I've never actually consumed coke. I've tried a few RC stimulants that are suppose to be similar in effect, though.
 
haha

does it? I suppose it lends itself to the assumption of a preferred ROA, but I don't feel that it infers a particular substance.
 
So, I ask again. Where is the Sr-90 and cs-137 from this nuclear weapon. They have sufficiently long Half-Lifes that the overwhelming majority of would still be around. You should be able to go up on a roof or some othe grimy place in the general area and a dirt cheap gamma+beta survey meter should be growling/ticking away rather nicely.
 
they got some mexican old lady to vacume it up in exchange for 3 peanuts and 4 kicks in the teeth per hour.
 
rangrz said:
So, I ask again. Where is the Sr-90 and cs-137 from this nuclear weapon. They have sufficiently long Half-Lifes that the overwhelming majority of would still be around. You should be able to go up on a roof or some othe grimy place in the general area and a dirt cheap gamma+beta survey meter should be growling/ticking away rather nicely.
Click to expand...

Microfusion bombs or something like that, according to the conspiracy theorists.

I'm pretty sure that the pixie dust sprinkled on them cleaned up the long-lasting isotopes.
 
Folley said:
If these "theorists" put half the effort into debunking the fake theories as they did into trying to prove the ridiculously absurd claims, like hologram-projected planes that don't exist, we would have this shit figured out by now.
Click to expand...

I can't help but think the video of it in slow motion looks fake.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LSDfbm8OhCg

There is no way an airplane would submerge itself fully into a steel framed building without at least a wing or tail fin getting ripped up. Really, you can't slam your fist on an airplane's nose or wings without making a serious dent. Regardless of how much it weighs in total or how fast it is going, the steel still provides an intense amount of strength and cannot be sliced by aluminum airplane wings. I haven't found any reliable eye-witness accounts of actually seeing this 2nd plane or the first one for that matter. I have seen accounts of people saying that they saw the explosion, but definitely did not see a plane.

Look at this shitty CGI visualization from Perdue U. Go fly an airplane into some strongly rooted and secured steel columns and see what happens in real life.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gH02Eh44yUg

As to the nuke...it may not have been, but those 2 wtc's didn't simply collapse, and some carefully placed conventional explosives could make at least large portions of the building collapse, but really, the towers were nearly disintegrated, mostly blown to bits. Sure there were some "wheat chex" of steel left, but not much. There are still too many strange occurances such as the arcing debris being propelled from the building, the scorched metal blocks away, the crater with a cooled magma-like appearence, the weeks long smoldering buried rubble, the large expanding volcano-like cloud that did not occur over wtc7 demolition, but did occur over 1 & 2, the vast amount of conventional explosives needed to create such an event, the thyroid cancers and skin tumors of wtc cleanup crews, the tritium in the ground water...

There are pictures and links to what I just listed in previous pages of the thread. Don't ask me to provide links again.
 
Last edited:
MyFinalRest said:
I can't help but think the video of it in slow motion looks fake.
Click to expand...
it looks fake to you because you've made your mind up that it's fake and you want to believe it's fake. nothing anybody here says will convince you otherwise and any attempt to do so is a waste of time.

when all you have is a hammer? definitely.

alasdair
 
^

Man, you just blew my mind! I was having sex the other day, and I was thinking "This doesn't look like pornography" right? Well now I know why, it's a holographic woman projected by government satellites!
 
there's also no one walking towards the camera in the foreground in slow motion with the end of the world happening behind him but he's too cool and calm to turn to look making it as though he does this every single day.


yeah man, that vid is all wrong. if you squint i think you can just about almost see the strings.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top