• Current Events & Politics
    Welcome Guest
    Please read before posting:
    Forum Guidelines Bluelight Rules
  • Current Events & Politics Moderators: deficiT | tryptakid | Foreigner

ALTERNATIVE THEORIES V: The Build-a-bear Workshop

MyFinalRest

Bluelighter
Joined
Aug 22, 2011
Messages
2,099
Location
Corporate Buttsecks
Welcome to the 5th installment of the greatest discussion Bluelight.ru has to offer!

ALTERNATIVE THEORIES V

This thread will need a poll. That poll shall be:

Was 9/11 an inside job?
1. Yes
2. No

freemasonrycompassandsqsk4.jpg

Freemasonry
lizard-man-150x150.jpg

Society's Elite
399a_larry_silverstein.jpg

"Lucky" Larry
42-15976216.jpg

Government Cover-ups
Jeff_Rense.jpg

Expert Analysis from Leading Internet Journalists!

And much, much more...

So grab your shitty tinfoil hats and hang on!
 
Continuing from the last thread:

The last thread truly opened my eyes. So I've been investigating the Illuminati using "plane crashes" (really, controlled demolitions) for nefarious purposes.

Here's some examples:

"The plane tore through roofs..." Now come on! If a bird hitting a plane can seriously damage it, how will it survive hitting multiple roofs, destroying them? And might I add that this happened in Lagos, Nigeria? You know, the same Nigeria with a lot of oil?
And even the date - 2012, June 3rd. Or 12/6/3, as many places would write it. Can't you see the symbolism?

"One engine shot through the side opposite the impact and flew as far as the next block..." Come on. It's a plane, how can it's engine survive going through an entire skyscraper to emerge on the other side? Bogus. And during wartime? Obviously this stinks of conspiracy.

"[A]fter hearing a loud explosion..." Explosion? That must be a controlled demolition. 'Nuff said.

"It took down three power poles before crashing..." Again, you've seen the damage a bird does to a plane. Now you're going to say that a plane is strong enough to sever not one, not two, but three power poles? Yah right. Not sure why the Illuminati wanted a power outage in Glendale, but their plan was a success.

Then there's the picture on this article. You're telling me a small plane did all of that? BS. It was the IRS building, the government is covering it up.

Now, where did I put my tinfoil hat.
 
Was 911 an inside job?
1. Yes
2. No
3. No one is doing anything about it so who the fuck cares?

I fucking care! ...in case you haven't noticed. I think Escher does too. We are doing things about it all the time.

lagos-plane-crash-ap-060412.jpg

This Nigerian plane crash makes it seem likely that there should have been lots of very readily identifiable plane debris at the Shanksville and Pentagon sites.

Glendale-Plane-Crash-4.jpg

I don't really see 3 "taken out" telephone poles as the journalist claimed. But, if the plane did, then you would have seen some interesting crashing as the plane met resistance unlike the wtc plane that effortlessly dipped right through the exterior steel columns.

49864-fa-18d-jet-crash-in-virginia-beach-7e92d.jpg

Hmmm, those were wooden framed roofs, not a steel framed skyscraper. Hurricane winds can take those down. Military planes like the F-18 Hornet are built a lot tougher than jetliners too. Obviously the thing started breaking up at impact unlike the wtc plane image, which once again, just effortlessly dipped through the exterior columns.

How do you like the new thread so far?
 
But, if the plane did, then you would have seen some interesting crashing as the plane met resistance unlike the wtc plane that effortlessly dipped right through the exterior steel columns.

Nobody claims that the planes were undamaged by striking even the outside of the WTC.

But hey, even 100+ tons (assuming empty weight) traveling at hundreds of miles an hour are going to do some damage. Sure, the planes were destroyed, with some parts (fuselage, engine) making deep penetration into the building. But why would the towers be designed to take that lateral force? A skyscraper needs to hold itself up. They aren't designed to survive being hit by a 767 on a suicide mission.

Also, I must invoke Occam here. Even assuming 9/11 was a conspiracy, its far simpler to use real aircrafts to attack the building than it is to fake it here.
 
It's a curious thing to see people care more about our government killing its own citizens as opposed to the government killing others at a higher frequency and more efficiently. Sounds like a waste of energy.
 
It's a curious thing to see people care more about our government killing its own citizens as opposed to the government killing others at a higher frequency and more efficiently. Sounds like a waste of energy.

Because it's easier to be a bored idiot with an internet connection than a productive human being.
 
Was 911 an inside job?
1. Yes
2. No
3. No one is doing anything about it so who the fuck cares?

Yes, for a plethora of reasons. We are continuing the debate, rather than let fake history live unopposed.

Now, where did I put my tinfoil hat.

Here's the thing: there's a reason why bullets are made of lead. Aluminum bullets are lighter and therefore fall faster in the air. Even at speed, they degrade faster, and do less damage because they shatter on impact instead of inflicting maximum inertia. See what happens when you shoot an aluminum bullet at a steel girder. Hell, make the experiment proportional and shoot a steel plate that would be the same size of the girder compared to a plane sized bullet. And the bullet travels much faster, mind you.

masonserpentjb.jpg

points to anyone who knows what this is^

It is a Free And Ancient Masonic Symbolism Chart depicting first, the two pillars of Jachin and Boaz in the Corinthian style holding up the duality of light and darkness in the form of the sun and the moon, which is interesting because the two pillars typically hold up the heavens and the earth, with the lamb and the beehive at their respective bases. The Corinthian style suggest maiden worship, ancient oligarchic codeword for children, along with the vines around them, have a creepy as shit symbolism in themselves. The vines of Dionysaic symbolism, as Manly P. Hell writes in the "Secret Teaching Of All Ages," refer to an unfinished Temple, not the Temple of Solomon, that existed in antediluvian times but fell to iniquity. The promise at the highest levels of Masonry is that this invisible all-encompasing temple will be rebuilt, much like the surveillance economy and police environment we all exist within today. The up and down pyramids are representing the power from below and above, much like the rest of the symbolism in the middle. Where the all seeing eye typically is on other charts, power from above is represented as the all-seeing illumination, while the power of the Church is dangling below. The rays shining from the unified duality are the sexual kinship, from the father to the mother and all in between on the 7 rays total.

And of course we have the aquarian constellation, slightly askew, hinting at with all this from the foundation of the checkerboard floor below will bring in the global order of their promise, completely and fully. The rays shining up from the middle would be the platonic symbols of the basic elements of reality sacrificial temple of the young maidens on the road to nonduological enlightenment and godhood.

I'm not sure, forget, but I think the words at the very top refer to the Ark Of Solomon, which would make sense with the other temple symbolism. I also forget what the fields mean, can't quite make out what's under the child sacrificing elemental temple, and there's also the writing which refers to the Ring Of Power Solomon was given by "god" I can't make out.

Close enough?
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

That out of the way, as always, and still pathetically yet, we have a decent sized problem on our hands, that we're continuing to allow it to happen. GMO's, the cancer causing weapons they are, will destroy the biosphere of this planet. Not the fraud of global warming or carbon, but what unaccountable and corrupt corporations are doing. As GMO's are designed to do what they do by very eugenic minded people. Fukushima is STILL in meltdown, and the whole world eats their fish, whether its labeled or not. The Planet is being irradiated, again with a long term depopulative goal in mind. There's many chemical poisons in all of our food, and we just take it for granted that certain FDA officials couldn't, god forbid, be paid millions of dollars to let some inherently dangerous chemicals into the food supply. RE: Donald Rumsfeld, Searle, and Aspartame. Never, we love our government, even though they have always lied to us at the best of their abilities, while still playing this masonic illusion of the duoplolous election system. Not going to get into that fake ass farce of a wrestling match this post....

More people than ever are on EXTREMELY hazardous psychotropic prescription medications. Because the "medical"(read "eugenic") industry is paid by the big pharma to do so. Then there's the chemtrail program and our modified atmosphere to bitch about another time. But in the interests of brevity, I'll wrap this up.

We are lied to, and most believe it. Why? I really don't understand.

May your chains rest lightly upon you.
 
Last edited:
Here's the thing: there's a reason why bullets are made of lead. Aluminum bullets are lighter and therefore fall faster in the air. Even at speed, they degrade faster, and do less damage because they shatter on impact instead of inflicting maximum inertia.

1. Do aluminum bullets fall faster? Being lighter, wouldn't they fall slower (they'd reach terminal velocity faster) or perhaps even fall at the same speed (Galileo's famous ball experiment).

2. Unlike bullets, aircraft tend to have engines.

3. If you hit a steel girder with 100 tons of metal, do you expect to see a major difference if that 100 tons is steel, versus 100 tons of aluminum?
 
I apologize because my wish isn't to offend you and yr theories but I have to say that I find yr theories laughable and preposterous.
 
^ Something flying horizontally would be subject to a lot more factors than something dropping vertically. Wind resistance, air drag and humidity, hell even the spin of the Earth all effect a bullets flight path.


So while it may be true that they should fall at the same speed, perhaps it's the environmental factors that would cause the aluminum bullet to slow faster? Less weight would mean less initial inertia, so even if it was going at the same speed it would be more affected than the lead bullet by something as simple as a light gust of wind. That's why my BB gun is so much more inaccurate and weaker than my .22, even though both shoot around 1000FPS
 
smaller heavier and harder is going to have a greater velocity.

Actually, assuming both bullets (the lead one and the aluminum one) are fired with the same amount of propellant, the lighter one should have a greater velocity when it leaves the barrel of the gun.

Think of cars - take a tiny little car and a big heavy car. Put the same V8 engine in both. Now, which car do you expect to be faster?
 
wouldn't the force simply pancake or obliterate the less dense aluminium than it does lead?


i freely admit i know nothing about firearms
 
wouldn't the force simply pancake or obliterate the less dense aluminium than it does lead?

I'd have to say, as an educated guess, no.

Lead is pretty malleable. I would suspect that it meets or exceeds the malleableness of aluminum.

But what does google turn up for "aluminum bullet"? Well lets see.

This person claims to have made them.
This thread is about (another?) company that makes them.

So its possible, according to google.

(Hmm, plastic bullets also seem to be produced, but mostly for conditions that call for short range.)
 
Top