• Current Events & Politics
    Welcome Guest
    Please read before posting:
    Forum Guidelines Bluelight Rules
  • Current Events & Politics Moderators: deficiT | tryptakid | Foreigner

Alex Jones says 'form of psychosis' made him believe events like Sandy Hook massacre

cduggles

Bluelight Crew
Joined
Nov 12, 2016
Messages
20,283
Location
A chromatically corrected world
Alex Jones says 'form of psychosis' made him believe events like Sandy Hook massacre were staged

190330100942-alex-jones-psychosis-sandy-hook-sot-1-large-169.jpg


(CNN) ? Broadcaster and conspiracy theorist Alex Jones said it was a "form of psychosis" that caused him to believe certain events --- like the Sandy Hook massacre -- were staged. On December 14, 2012, 20 children and six adults were killed by 20-year-old Adam Lanza in Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut.
Jones, who founded InfoWars.com and hosted a three-hour news-talk radio program which he said was carried on more than 160 stations, had repeatedly suggested in the past that the Sandy Hook shooting was a "giant hoax" carried out by crisis actors on behalf of people who oppose the Second Amendment.

InfoWars has also suggested the September 11 attacks were an inside job orchestrated by the US government.

170127115925-alex-jones-large-169.jpg


This week, Jones acknowledged the shooting was real during a sworn deposition he made as part of a defamation case brought against him by Sandy Hook victims' families.

"And I, myself, have almost had like a form of psychosis back in the past where I basically thought everything was staged, even though I've now learned a lot of times things aren't staged," he said. "So I think as a pundit, someone giving an opinion, that, you know, my opinions have been wrong, but they were never wrong consciously to hurt people."

He said it was the "trauma of the media and the corporations lying so much" that caused him to distrust everything, "kind of like a child whose parents lie to them over and over again."

"So long before these lawsuits I said that in the past I thought everything was a conspiracy and I would kind of get into that mass group think of the communities that were out saying that," he said. "And so now I see that it's more in the middle... so that's where I stand."

The lawsuits against Jones


The broadcaster faces multiple lawsuits from families of students and educators killed in the Sandy Hook shooting. Two lawsuits were filed in April 2018 by three parents whose children were killed, and a month later, he was sued by the families of six victims, who were joined by an FBI agent who responded to the shooting.

The first two lawsuits each sought at least $1 million in damages for "a severe degree of mental stress and anguish" and "high degree of psychological pain" that the parents suffered as a result from Jones' coverage of the shooting, in addition to past and future damage their reputations may suffer.

"Defendants' defamatory publications were designed to harm the Plaintiffs' reputation and subject the Plaintiffs to public contempt, disgrace, ridicule, or attack," the lawsuits allege. "Defendants acted with actual malice. Defendants' defamatory statements were knowingly false or made with reckless disregard for the truth or falsity of the statements at the time the statements were made."

180417174111-sandy-hook-victims-parents-sue-alex-jones-large-169.jpg


The May lawsuit names Jones as the "chief amplifier for a group that has worked in concert to create and propagate loathsome, false narratives about the Sandy Hook shootings and its victims, and promote their harassment and abuse." The suit also names six companies, including entities tied to the InfoWars website.

"We've clearly got people where it's actors playing different parts of different people," the lawsuit quotes Jones as saying in March 2014. "I've looked at it and undoubtedly there's a cover-up, there's actors, they're manipulating, they've been caught lying and they were pre-planning before it and rolled out with it."

But Jones later addressed the claims on his website saying it was "all out of context," and that it wasn't "even what I said or my intent." He has described the suit as an attack on him and the First Amendment.

Last year, major social media platforms like YouTube, Facebook and Twitter all said they had removed content from Jones or InfoWars because it violated their policies. YouTube removed many channels associated with InfoWars -- including The Alex Jones Channel , which had 2.4 million subscribers and videos that had been viewed over 1.5 billion times.

"When users violate ... policies repeatedly, like our policies against hate speech and harassment or our terms prohibiting circumvention of our enforcement measures, we terminate their accounts," a YouTube spokesperson had said.

 
When, where did he say that? i wanna watch it I don't take the guy seriously but hes funny as f
 
When, where did he say that? i wanna watch it I don't take the guy seriously but hes funny as f

Your wish is my command (just scroll to bottom of article at link for videos):

(WATCH) Alex Jones Completely Loses It In Sandy Hook Deposition Video

Right-Wing conspiracy theorist Alex Jones was questioned for nearly three hours by a lawyer representing a Sandy Hook parent who accused Jones of perpetuating a sickeningly false hoax. Let?s just say that the interview needed a lot of do-overs.

Incredibly enough, Jones could not even remember the date in which the horrific shooting took place at SandyHook Elementary in 2012.


?Like I told you, most of this stuff I can?t even remember,? Jones says about the 2012 Sandy Hook shooting at one point.


Released earlier today, the deposition shows a visibly jilted Jones in the hot seat as he painfully tries to justify his reasoning for spending years outrageously claiming that the SandyHook gun massacre― which left 20 children and six adults dead ― was a hoax.


Jones is being sued by nine family members of loved ones who perished in the tragic shooting, including Scarlett Lewis, who is suing Jones for intentional infliction of emotional distress. Lewis is represented by Mark Bankston of the Texas law firm Farrar & Ball.


Curiously enough, Jones suddenly started believing the shooting indeed happened after being served with a slew of lawsuits. Yet Jones appears to cast doubt on the veracity of the shootings in his disastrous deposition, which can be viewed below.
 
Last edited:
Man those deposition videos are priceless. I wish we could take every conspiracy theorist and subject them to depositions.
 
/\ Why the crusade against conspiracy theorists? A lot of it is "out there" but I think some of it is worth investigating and drawing your own conclusions.
 
/\ Why the crusade against conspiracy theorists? A lot of it is "out there" but I think some of it is worth investigating and drawing your own conclusions.

OK in fairness I've had close friends who were conspiracy theorists, so no I don't have any true hatred or personal dislike of such people.

But I do strongly dislike conspiracy theorist beliefs. I don't believe it's true investigation and doubt. And I think the results of it are extremely distructive to both conspiracy theorists and wider society.

So seeing someone who perpetuates conspiracy theories for a living having to sit down while someone goes through all the absurdity of their behavior and reasoning is something I find quite enjoyable.
 
What do you classify as "conspiracy theorist beliefs" tho? What about when something comes out as being true that was previously widely thought to be a conspiracy?
 
Well first I'd need to draw a distinction between a conspiracy theory, as a term with specific connotations, and a more general theory about a possible conspiracy.

Just proposing that an accepted accounting of events might be untrue in some coordinated deliberate way does not make in a conspiracy theory with its associated connotations.

What makes it that kind of upper case conspiracy theory is the excessively detailed explanations, implausible level of coordination and silence by an implausible large number of conspiritors for it to work.

One tell tale sign, if it would require any more than maybe 20 conspiritors, it's probably a conspiracy theory. And I've never seen one of those proven to the point of reaching general acceptance by society.

Conspiracy theories are believed because of certain flaws in the way many people process information. Which renders all conspiracy theories very similar, and is no doubt why most conspiracy theorists believe a great many conspiracy theories simultaneously. It's those flaws, the way people come to conclude that the conspiracy theory is true is what makes it different from a benign theory about how some event might have happened that's different to what's accepted.

Remember those boys that were rescued from that cave in Thailand? And initially they basically suggested that they weren't drugged for the rescue. If I had said that I didn't believe that, that I believed that was a lie, that wouldn't be a conspiracy theory. Since there's virtually no evidence that I have to somehow dismiss that says they weren't drugged, and requires very few people and resources to lie about it.

If on the other hand I said that the entire event was staged, that none of those children even exist. That would be a conspiracy theory.

That is the difference between a conspiracy theory, and honestly questioning an official narrative.
 
Top