A quick second dip, as opposed to a long one? How about a third one? The blotter would be near totally saturated. In my opinion, there would be no noticeable increase in effects
Dimmo... YES, a quick second dip as opposed to a long one.
If you submersed it for a period of time (i reckon longer than maybe even 5 or 10 seconds) the first DRIED dipping would totally re-dissolve, and you'd take it out and it would dry with, effectively, the same sized hit as after the first time.
HOWEVER, if you dip a PRE-DIPPED and DRIED tab back into the solution just for a quick half second or so, a thin layer of liquid is going to cling to the tab (or sheet, i imagine you'd dip it BEFORE cutting the sheet into separate tabs).
As you take it out, after that half second dipping, that extra, small but extra, layer is going to soak into the already dipped tab/sheet as it dries.
i cannot see the difference being a DOUBLE hit, but i could see it being a noticeable, detectable difference. Remember, we're talking like, around a quarter of a milligram here, even the tiniest of blotters, 6 or 10 mm, is capable of absorbing a lot of liquid, and when you dry it you're freeing space for more to be absorbed again.
I read somewhere on erowid about DOB adulterated blotter being found by police in the US. DOB is active at 2 - 5 milligrams, so you can get about that much AT LEAST into a blotter. street acid would never be above 500ug i am assuming,(and generally far less than that) so there is room for a lot more in that blotter.
(imagine getting a 2mg blotter handed to you by your dealer. you'd be in for a ride that night(And the next day)).
Equally, If you had double strength liquid, or quadruple strength liquid, the blotter would soak up approximately the same amount of liquid, only there would be more LSD crystal in it when it dried. there is room for more dried crystal/powder whatever, just not more liquid, so as long as your second dipping doesnt allow for redissolving of the first dose, then it will improve its strength, i'd wager.
also -
and im pretty sure that LSD is not a fungus from wheat, either...
I think you'll find that ergot is a fungus that attacks rye, wheat and other grasses. You will also find that Albert Hoffman was interested in developing medicines from compounds in ergot
Yeah, but ergot is not ACID. Developed from, but not chemically equivalent to it. this guy spoke as if eating fungi ridden wheat would get you acid-tripping.
peece.