Besides becoming a flame war between some of our otherwise usually very cordial and well-rounded/level-headed members (someone swap your morning coffee for decaf guys or what?) I still haven't got one single response presenting any compound that even approximates my simple inquiry; I mention this not as venting to any underlying frustration at the circumstance or it being construed as some personal slight (this thread has too much enough of that) but because I find this the very factor of the matter that no-one has furnished such to be a fascinating case..... Very possibly/Maybe not related to what the causal browser/lurker could chalk up to just tghe usual web forum TL;DR vacant stare omission of noninterest
...cocaine was pretty much the first chemical recognized stimulant, so SNDRI, or tri-uptake inhibitor became the staple gold-standard as a category and a heading for such types, and we shelved it away in our collective chemistry memory as such.... but the SSRIs, DRIs, NDRIs, etc, seem to be the rule over the exception... might it be possible that the fog of those academic chemists wanting to understand each stand alone monoamine transporter/receptor separately by way of finding selective compounds has made everyone not notice that cocaine, far from being the first of some wide gulf of a category ("SNDRI"), is actually something of a rarity in its spread of hitting those three (admittedly closely related but with all due respect to also note being structurally distinct enough for each one to be tersed apart from one another so much and so far so that they are left cleanly un-engaged/un-entangled from exogenous functions set to probe them by design?) neurotransmitter transporter sites as indiscriminately and as readily as it does?
Again, it's so blatant of a subject, it might be seen as a silly thing, but if so, wouldn't my task asking to present another able to say *one such other* drug by name would by now have some values/numbers thrown out in response?
