• Psychedelic Drugs Welcome Guest
    View threads about
    Posting RulesBluelight Rules
    PD's Best Threads Index
    Social ThreadSupport Bluelight
    Psychedelic Beginner's FAQ
  • PD Moderators: Esperighanto | JackARoe |

2c-x/DOx crossover.

Anon0631

Anon0631

Bluelighter
Joined
Apr 22, 2012
Messages
711
Location
London, UK
I had a lovely experience this weekend snorting 15mg of 2c-b and eating 2mg DOC as soon as I was sure that I was in a comfortable place. As the 2c-b dropped off, the DOC started to climb towards the peak. It was a really smooth transition from lighthearted to more meaningful and it somehow increased the depth of the experience without changing the nature of the DOC peak.

I'm really interested in doing the same with 2c compounds and their amphetamine analogues. So 2c-b/DOB, 2c-c/DOC, 2c-d/DOM, etc. it will be a nice way to really understand the differences between the two series and might feel even more synergistic than the last experiment.

I wonder if something like 25c-NBOMe/DOC taken in the same way would work as well. Somehow I doubt it due to the brutal tolerance effects that the n,benzyl phenethylamines display.

By the way, I'm not interested in the inevitable trolling of this thread by the LSD marketing board. If you don't believe in the value of any psychedelic other than your chosen object of religious adulation, please keep your opinions to yourself.
 
Last edited:
This sounds like a very interesting project. However, I would think twice about 25x/DOx combinations. Actually, I would not do that at all. The risk of dangerous vasoconstriction and/or other problems with such mixtures is very real. I say stick to 2C-x/DOx. Also, in the interest accuracy and harm reduction, you should not use DOx blotters because you may not ingest the full dose, or the paper may not contain the stated dose, etc. BTW, I wholly agree with your final paragraph. I would prefer if this thread stays firmly on-topic.
 
I guess the 25x/DOx combos are less attractive anyway because n,benzyls last longer than their 2c counterparts.

It would be more a case of being on both substances at the same time rather than transitioning from one to the other.
 
Not always, but generally speaking, yes, and because of that, your idea of "transitioning" from one substance to another would be rendered caput.

Edit: You read my mind when you added that last sentence as I typed the above observation. Ha!
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top