• Philosophy and Spirituality
    Welcome Guest
    Posting Rules Bluelight Rules
    Threads of Note Socialize
  • P&S Moderators: JackARoe | Cheshire_Kat

What aspects of the atheist religion do you like/dislike?

I'll tell you what you did with atheists for about 1500 years. You outlawed them from the Universities, or any teaching careers, besmirched their reputations, banned or burned their books or their writings of any kind, drove them into exile, humiliated them, seized their properties, arrested them for blasphemy. You dehumanized them with beatings and exquisite torture, gouged out their eyes, slit their tongues, stretched, crushed or broke their limbs, tore off their breasts if they were women, crushed their scrotums if they were men, imprisoned them, stabbed them, disemboweled them, hung them and burnt them alive. And now you have the nerve enough to complain to me that I laugh at you
-Dr. Madalyn Myrray O'Hair.

As for free will, contemporary physical theory says that we cannot calculate exactly where any subatomic particle actually is, but only where it probably will be. So it's loose, all things moving in random swerves. When an action occurs that you observe, it has an effect on you, and that effect is probabilistic, not deterministic, which gives rise to the almost infinite number of variables that you, as your own entity, will react to something differently than other people do. Every thought or idea or action is your reaction to stimulus in your own personal way because of the way subatomic particles interact with each other in random behaviors. This is why we have the illusion of free will, there are many reactions we could have to a certain stimulus and the randomness allows us all to have a different one.

That's not very refined but it's just an idea. So I wouldn't say that life is pre determined because we all make choice, although the world we live in now is exactly like this because everything in history happened exactly the way it did.

Also someone said that science helps us make weapons that hurt other people so we should get rid of the scientific theory... right. That is true, humans have created some pretty fucked up shit. However, science has also done miraculous good. A lot of good and some bad.
What has religion actually done that has shown an improvement in people's lives that could not have been caused or propogated by other completely different social structures like community groups?

What I'm getting at is this; you can't have science without science(medicine, computers, technology in general are good and we get those with science), but you can raise good people without religion. I'd even say that you could raise better people without any religion ever, because once you invent a religion you invent something that someone doesn't agree with and now you and your whole family hate him and his whole family because he doesn't subscribe to the same local group superstition that you do.

Religion is poison. Enough said.
 
Science and religion both have underlying assumptions. Science isn't static it continues to evolve and the majority of what was considered true at one point is no longer considered so. Science as it is applied is not as pure as the concept of science. Unless a lab is able to get funding for a project then the study won't happen. This will make some facts more likely to be proven than others. There is also human error. I had much more faith in science until I worked in a neuroscience lab and saw just who it is that is creating this knowledge that we all believe in.

At any time we can choose to believe that what is currently understood is "truth" or that it is simply a current idea that will will change again in the future.
 
That's not what I meant. I wasn't trying to beg a question. What I meant is it is futile to argue about it because no one knows. It's also arrogant as a human to declare one as side as true or that you know. No one on earth is a god and no one knows if any exist or not.

Exactly. But this is exactly what every religion has done in the history of the planet: claim things no human can possibly know. So you're being contradictory.

I say in my post, which you partially quoted, that some beliefs & practices are clearly wrong & have no place in the modern world. My point is that science is used as an argument for atheism, atheists would like to see religion outlawed or destroyed, when science produces the abominiations of chemical biological & nuclear weaponry no one suggests we scrap the scientific method do they ?
Personally I think science & those who misuse it to further their own blinkered beliefs is probably potentially much more dangerous than religion.
This discussion is related to MDAOs thread on the trinity of commerce,state & religion I think.


Summary - would the world be better without religion - in some ways yes in others probably not.
Would the world be better off without science - in some ways yes in others perhaps not - do you think I've missed a trick ?

First off, I really doubt that the majority of atheists would want religion outlawed. The reason why people are atheists is because they hate being told what to think or believe. So why would they force those same standards they abhor onto others? They wouldn't. This isn't the USSR or China. And I will admit to wanting religion gone (how can believing something with no adequate proof be seen as a good thing?). However, I don't think that that is likely at all, and in some ways I like that, because then our brains will always be challenged and forced to adapt and be creative.

Secondly, your comparison about the worst of science and the worst of religion is absolute crap. It's in the same league as calling Hitler, Stalin, Mao, and others true atheists, and that everything they did is indicative of what an atheist might do. Which is complete garbage. Nuclear bombs are an invention that people created, that can be used or not used. Religion and all of atrocities done in its name were done so specifically because the holy books demand it. It's not some rare offshoot that misuses religion, but is actually what religion is.


You need to calm down. I came and shared my opinion. Which was based on the people I've met an the theologies that they've held. So yes it was generalized but its foundation is just as founded and general as any observation you could make about any religion.

and no, if you want to come a form a purely scientific standpoint all existence is pre determined. Meaning everything you do and every thing you ever will do, everything thing that ever happened to you and everything that ever will was dictated since the big bang. Since all energy shot out in specific vectors, that means that all energy ended up collecting in spots where the vectors of their launch dictated that they would end up. Tha t in turn means all the hydrogen tha made stars and what not formed in places that were pre-determined. those stares grew and died at rates that were pre determined based on how much hydrogen was there. that means that they matter that was forged inn the stars was already predetermined. That matter flew around in space based on vectors it gained form the star collapsing. based on those vectors subtenances come together and make bigger clumps of matter. Fast forward this to earth. All mater ended up where it would be then animals evolve from it. animals brains are machines made of matter that store an electrical charge. that electricity is transmuted by neurons which are made of mater and effected by different chemicals. ANd that means that free will is an illusion and everything that ever happens was pre-determined at the start of the universe. because everything is going where it was pre determined to go and everything you do is based on your experiences plus whatever chemicals are in your brain at one moment, there is an illusion of choice but seeing as your brain is made of matter and energy it is going to react in a scientifically calculable way. (not calculable to humans but calculable no the less)

http://i1203.photobucket.com/albums/bb395/mbr07c/philosoraptor-free-will.png

Okay, first off, I've never made any generalities about the people and what they individually believe, just the tenants of the actual faiths, so there is a difference. So calling atheists as a whole a "hate group" is patently false and ignorant.

I could say all Christians think and behave like the billboards below, but I don't because I know for a fact that isn't true.

So, compare these atheist signs...

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2009/01/06/article-1106924-02F6286B000005DC-556_468x224.jpg
http://1stnews.org/images/atheist-billboard.jpg
http://www.theblaze.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/bbweb.jpg
http://1stnews.org/images/godless-highway.jpg
http://www.examiner.com/images/blog/wysiwyg/image/billboardup_flash(2).jpg

to these Christian ones.

http://thevillageheathen.files.wordpress.com/2010/06/atheist_billboard.jpg
http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y49/pspauld/BlogPix/6a00d8341c6d4753ef01157135350a970c-.jpg
http://7.media.tumblr.com/1JRD8PESKo6wq90a6Y0e0OMro1_500.jpg
http://thorg.chattablogs.com/images/gay_unhappy.jpg
http://img641.imageshack.us/img641/3680/bbchristian11.jpg
http://datingjesus.files.wordpress....-billboard-18267-1236608489-2.jpg?w=425&h=258

See the difference?

Your second point I'm not even going to address. It's just nonsense. You completely ignored my point about conscious and deliberate free will.


( y.-) I was talking about the scores of atheist where I live. And yes that would be my statement if most of america was Muslim. I've never known an atheist who has demonstrated against Buddhists or any Buddhist institution. I've never know an atheist that has demonstrated against satanism. I've never met an atheist who has gone against a native american tribe, in fact i know a few who fought for their religious right to kill whales where I live. Atheist against skih or Islam.


All of which are heavily prevalent in my area. In fact most atheists I HAVE known have barely known a lick of any religious philosophy beyond Christianity. A lot of them did not even know that Islam and Christianity are related. What would you say if I continually talked shit about your race (relative to the ambiguity of institution) disregarding all and any positive things they may have contributed. Would the excuse oh I only talk shit about (your race) because they are the most prevalent in society work for you?

If most atheists are not collectively demonstrating against all religions in a balanced manner then they are "hating."

See, again, you are judging religion and atheism unfairly. Religious people tortured and killed atheists for hundreds and hundreds of years, but have I brought it up (until now)? No, because I know that isn't the norm anymore. Have I compared all Christians to people like Jim Jones or Rush Limbaugh? No, because I know that not all Christians are like that.

Yet you consistently say that since a few atheists do not know much about religion, and ignore the "positive things", that ALL atheists are hatemongering fanatics.


Also, I wish to present you wish a challenge.

Name me one good or moral act that a believer could do, but no nonbeliever could.
Now name me a wicked act that is done by a believer, but that no nonbeliever could.
 
( y.-) once again you're trying to argue with me. I'm neutral. Once again I was making a generalized statement about the atheist that I know. Do I know you? No, I don't. I ignored your post because it is scientifically unfounded. That may be your BELIEF but scientific fact dictates that you are wrong. You've drawn generations about me judging atheists and religious people. I never said all, I continually brought the subset back to those that I know.
and ultimately you continue to try and challenge your unfounded concepts of my opinion, if that is what you want to do than go and have an argument with yourself.

"Exactly. But this is exactly what every religion has done in the history of the planet: claim things no human can possibly know. So you're being contradictory."
Nothing about this statement was contradictory I'm of the opinion that both sides are arrogant.

"I could say all Christians think and behave like the billboards below, but I don't because I know for a fact that isn't true."
I could say that all atheist are self serving pompous assholes who are so full of themselves that they cannot take the slightest provocation without going into a flurry and spouting a lot of things about science and theoretical physics that they don't even understand, but I don't because I know for a fact that isn't true.

Good day sir, calm the fuck down.
 
( y.-) once again you're trying to argue with me. I'm neutral. Once again I was making a generalized statement about the atheist that I know. Do I know you? No, I don't. I ignored your post because it is scientifically unfounded. That may be your BELIEF but scientific fact dictates that you are wrong. You've drawn generations about me judging atheists and religious people. I never said all, I continually brought the subset back to those that I know.
and ultimately you continue to try and challenge your unfounded concepts of my opinion, if that is what you want to do than go and have an argument with yourself.

"Exactly. But this is exactly what every religion has done in the history of the planet: claim things no human can possibly know. So you're being contradictory."
Nothing about this statement was contradictory I'm of the opinion that both sides are arrogant.

"I could say all Christians think and behave like the billboards below, but I don't because I know for a fact that isn't true."
I could say that all atheist are self serving pompous assholes who are so full of themselves that they cannot take the slightest provocation without going into a flurry and spouting a lot of things about science and theoretical physics that they don't even understand, but I don't because I know for a fact that isn't true.

Good day sir, calm the fuck down.

I'm really not sure why you came onto this site to bitch about how atheists are arrogant and hateful (yet not say a single word about religious people) when you are supposedly neutral. If you are neutral, why do you care? Isn't that the definition of neutrality?

Other than that, I can see that you are content to ramble on about things that you know nothing about, and have no interest in learning or having a rational discussion, so I am done talking with you.
 
Neutrality is not the lack of caring neutrality is "not aligned with or supporting any side or position in a controversy." You're the only person who has said something ignorant of facts which was your unscientific belief about free will and your lack of knowledge about the definition of Neutrality; Which again you used to make another unfounded oppositional statement to your view of my view point. You're the only person who has displayed a lack of knowledge, and you continue to make irrational statements. I did not come here to bitch about atheism I came here to talk to other people. The title of this thread is "What aspects of the atheist religion do you like/dislike?" Feel free to make a thread about what people like/dislike about religion and I'll share my opinion on religion as well. Making any statements about my opinion of religion in this thread would be out of place. And even with that said if you go back to my fist post I DID nay say Christianity.

Now seeing as I've pointed out that everything in your post false, I feel that I can fairly come to the conclusion that you, are the one being irrational, YOU lack the interest in rational discussion (based on your unfounded statements about me not having said anything about religious people and neutrality) and YOU are the one who doesn't know anything about what you are talking about.


You lose, good day sir :|



2517724915_6ffe543227.jpg
 
Are you all really done? :)

Has anybody experienced God? Or the non-existence of God?

"The fact that life evolved out of nearly nothing, some 10 billion years after the universe evolved out of literally nothing, is a fact so staggering that I would be mad to attempt words to do it justice." - Richard Dawkins

Is this a fact? Has there been a controlled experiment that created an entire universe to support this fact? Has anybody seen it happen? Or is it a belief based on certain assumptions that are unquestionably true?
 
While science has never produced an entire universe they have created DNA. And apparently brought it to life. http://news.discovery.com/tech/synthetic-genome-life.html

I don't believe in god but I do believe in a sort of universal Qi. As far as my experiences have shown me I fit spiritually withing Dao and Ayurveda. But, legerity I believe that your post might do better in its own thread.
 
I'll tell you what you did with atheists for about 1500 years. You outlawed them from the Universities, or any teaching careers, besmirched their reputations, banned or burned their books or their writings of any kind, drove them into exile, humiliated them, seized their properties, arrested them for blasphemy. You dehumanized them with beatings and exquisite torture, gouged out their eyes, slit their tongues, stretched, crushed or broke their limbs, tore off their breasts if they were women, crushed their scrotums if they were men, imprisoned them, stabbed them, disemboweled them, hung them and burnt them alive. And now you have the nerve enough to complain to me that I laugh at you
-Dr. Madalyn Myrray O'Hair.

Madalyn Murray O'Hair is an embarrassment to atheism.
 
I the other thing I don't like about atheism is how tempting it is for people to arrive at atheism and then think that's the end of the discussion of spirituality or metaphysical or anything else belief-wise. That's incredibly lame, lamer than the bible IMO.
 
I like getting reminded of things. It makes me remember that I have a history. Then again, I don't like getting reminded of things. It makes me remember that I have a history.
 
I the other thing I don't like about atheism is how tempting it is for people to arrive at atheism and then think that's the end of the discussion of spirituality or metaphysical or anything else belief-wise. That's incredibly lame, lamer than the bible IMO.

Thats not true. The latest trend is to be a "spiritual atheist."
 
This whole thread is incoherent. The subject matter, I mean specifically, to say nothing of the posts following its inception.

(secular humanist here. prefer to believe in something uplifting, rather than non-stamp-collecting. I have had many spiritual experiences but see them as the product of my mind, strange-loop software ghost in the machine living in computational substrate that it is, reflecting back in upon itself. I do not find that this reduces the magic or beauty of it; if anything, it is increased!)
 
Top