hydroazuanacaine
bluelighter
- Joined
- May 17, 2007
- Messages
- 8,493
Straw Dogs
it was entertaining. i watched it in three sittings, which is terrible way to watch a movie. though i just about perfectly watched each act in one sitting.
it seems like it cannot make up it's mind between low and high brow. and it's not a like a cool or interesting blend of the two. i had a really hard time deciding whether peckinpah just is not much of an intellectual, or if there was really tons more going on than it appears. because:
anyway, the actress who played the wife was a beauty and worked well on the screen. i'll be keeping an eye out for her.
it was entertaining. i watched it in three sittings, which is terrible way to watch a movie. though i just about perfectly watched each act in one sitting.
it seems like it cannot make up it's mind between low and high brow. and it's not a like a cool or interesting blend of the two. i had a really hard time deciding whether peckinpah just is not much of an intellectual, or if there was really tons more going on than it appears. because:
david never really gets tough. he is a coward at the beginning, and a fool at the end. he puts the concept of "his house" and the life of a handicap pedophile over the safety of his wife. when an attacker sticks his head and gun through the window, david swings his club at the attackers shotgun barrel instead of the attacker--does the director peckinpah just not have an internal gorilla and really think that's how a man defends his home and wife, or is david still supposed to be coward on some level? what makes me think more is going on his david crawls to his wife (literally) when the fight comes down to one man v one man with fists. so when he decided he was going to fight everyone when they had guns, was he just being an idiot? why does he seem to care more about the (lennie-style) pedophile than his wife? i know at first it is about the concept of a man''s home, but after it is all over he seems to have a stronger connection with the lennie-character (who attacked his wife) than his wife.
and his wife is so hesitant to stand by him. she is afraid he cannot protect her--for obvious reasons. but he feels completely alienated from her and the country at the end of the movie, telling lennie he does not know his way home either.
i just do not understand what peckinpah is getting at. the wife seems at home in ireland, unlike david. she has a strange connection with one of her rapists (before and after). is she wrong in not standing by him, or is he wrong in feeling alienated by her? or is it just supposed to be tragic that he does not understand the trauma that is causing her behavior? it does not feel that way. i think david is a pussy with poor priorities from start to finish.
is Straw Dogs high brow enough that peckinpah is trying for deformation of mastery and we are supposed to have a protagonist who goes through a unhelpful enlightenment and leaves the movie only changed on the surface but still the same at the core? and what is who he is supposed to be say about the wife? anything?
sometime i gotta do some blog searching and see if anyone can convince me that the way this film turned out was intentional.
and his wife is so hesitant to stand by him. she is afraid he cannot protect her--for obvious reasons. but he feels completely alienated from her and the country at the end of the movie, telling lennie he does not know his way home either.
i just do not understand what peckinpah is getting at. the wife seems at home in ireland, unlike david. she has a strange connection with one of her rapists (before and after). is she wrong in not standing by him, or is he wrong in feeling alienated by her? or is it just supposed to be tragic that he does not understand the trauma that is causing her behavior? it does not feel that way. i think david is a pussy with poor priorities from start to finish.
is Straw Dogs high brow enough that peckinpah is trying for deformation of mastery and we are supposed to have a protagonist who goes through a unhelpful enlightenment and leaves the movie only changed on the surface but still the same at the core? and what is who he is supposed to be say about the wife? anything?
sometime i gotta do some blog searching and see if anyone can convince me that the way this film turned out was intentional.
anyway, the actress who played the wife was a beauty and worked well on the screen. i'll be keeping an eye out for her.