XdismaloneX
Greenlighter
Its for all. The first time I saw them was with a 30. Slowly they're showing up on all the Meg's as old stocks are used up. Pharmacies are even filling partial old and partial new scripts whichever sucks.
^Whatever, i'm not going to argue with greenlighters with 3 posts.
So theoretically if oxycodone hcl is soluble in isopropyl alcohol like this should be fairly straightforward.
I imagine the gelling agent can't be any worse than the one in concerta. Consider iso can extract that (and opana from what I hear) I bet it can also work with this.
Can someone apply this method in the link below to an OP? Maybe letting evap. overnight instead of using heat due to opiod heat destruction. Make sure to use 91% iso or higher.
http://www.bluelight.ru/vb/showthread.php?p=8121550
It's worth a shot . If I had any OP's I would have already tried it. Other alcohols are worth a shot if iso doesn't cut it. I know virgin ethanol is easier to get a hold of then virgin iso...
I haven't seen the PDF but from what I hear simple solvents (like iso) extract up to 70%. This may be a viable method.
-lenses
I have a question that I didn't see answered in this thread. I looked through most of it but I may have missed some of it.
My question is: Is the new formula for OC restricted only to 80mg? I ask because I recently recieved 40mg OC and it is the same as what I have recieved before. It says OC on one side and 40 on the other.
Is the new formula only for 80mg, or is it for all Oxycontin? Anyone know?
LaMessia, check out the op experiment thread. I posted some additional solvents that theoretically should work. Also, if u look at the FDA PowerPoint they had LESS success with heated extractions.
Of course there is a direct coorelation between my number of posts and my ability to differentiate between useful and useless information. I mean thats just a given right?
I personally have tried the following solvents, MEK,Acetone,IPA,PH'd(3-4) water, and ethanol. I have found little to no progress from any of them leading me to believe that it requires more then just the solvent itself but maybe heat that allows the polymers to breakdown easier.
I will admit that my extractions were rushed and in the PDF it explains that better yeilds came with longer extractions with the exception of the slide that pertains to heating and extracting. But I dont believe this to be as easy as add solvent / evap.
I apologize if I came off as rude I dont mean to derail this thread or fill it with clutter, but being so quick to judge someone based off their post count truley signifies an outlook of arrogance.
Truce Lenses *shakes hand and smiles*Le_Messia : I didn't mean to insult you or be a dick, but there are a lot of greenlighters who only post to troll and I automatically respond strongly. It's pointless and distracts from the thread. *shakes Le_Messia's hand*
Actually your info is the most helpful to me so far. So with the solvents you have tried what was the end result? Did any of them not gel up?
Something to break down the polymer such as an enzyme may be needed in conjunction with a solvent extraction afterwards. From what has been said about sucking on the OP , it seems that the saliva somehow breaks down the polymer ... Amylase is the main enzyme that breaks down sugars in saliva and I can't think of any reason why it wouldn't work. Amylase is also produced in the pancreas and is in the stomach.
I'll see how easy it is to get a hold of amylase enzyme or something similar in function.
From a biological viewpoint , when the OP is taken as directed (orally) the stomach must have something crucial that breaks the polymer down. Either it's simply the HCL in the stomach which breaks it down, but I don't think it is as easy as an acid/base extraction. Does anyone have any info regarding acid/base from the PDF?
We're making progress...
-lenses
I thought hydroxypropyl cellulose was the binder in the old formulation? Is this actually the gelling agent in the new formulation?
I thought hydroxypropyl cellulose was the binder in the old formulation? Is this actually the gelling agent in the new formulation?