The 6-APB thread (Part 2)

[zamzams]

Thanks zamzams gives me good hopes for my next attempt. I will be plugging just a bit over 50mg I reckon. Hopefully that will be as good as a 100mg oral dose.

should be fine with that the come up was lovely. Though it was a bit slower than i expected took a good 2 hours to hit the peak, definitely would recommend this ROA considering i didn't get any bad side effects from it other than rushing to the toilet the following morning.

Drinking beer though left me with a slight headache though that could have been what with me passing so much water it seemed. I felt fantastic the next day after a really good nights sleep i was a lot more cheery than i normally am the following day after any night of doing stims.

 

[Mullered]

should be fine with that the come up was lovely. Though it was a bit slower than i expected took a good 2 hours to hit the peak, definitely would recommend this ROA considering i didn't get any bad side effects from it other than rushing to the toilet the following morning.

Drinking beer though left me with a slight headache though that could have been what with me passing so much water it seemed. I felt fantastic the next day after a really good nights sleep i was a lot more cheery than i normally am the following day after any night of doing stims.

I've got new scales on order for the next sample. If its going to be closer to 100mg then I want to bump a bit off for a top up later.

 

[I NUK3D U]

There is rarely a time where oral > rectal on anything

 

[TMenderoflives]

There is rarely a time where oral > rectal on anything

Dont mean to be obtuse but give me a blow job over taking one in the arse any day of the week

 

[Mugz]

I think that since the next sample I have I should really split between the two of us. 50/50

I will definitley be taking my 50mg dose rectally, will just have to see how the lovely miss angelsmoke will take hers. I think that there is a good chance she will also do it rectally seeing as I have heard it could reduce the need to vomit.

 

[(hemist]

I´m leaving mirtazapin and test later maybe when I know more how safe that shit is. I don´t need much provoke then to IV it 8)..

You done another test of this stuff yet? I got some in the post today, is it safe to try?

 

[LysergicEpiphany]

1-(benzofuran-6-yl)propan-2-amine; Can somebody please assure me that this is 4-Desoxy-MDA ? Baffled me :S is this the chemical compound mentioned in the TRs here on BL or is this another chemical ?

[removed vendor text]

 

[deko]

FFS stop putting up vast copies of vendor text.

6-APB ( is what has been allegedly sampled by a few people here recently)
I say this as no one has actually spent the money to get a proper test done to found out what it is.

6-APDB is the Nichols compound and this is what's called (4-Desoxy-MDA)


I don't think 6-APB has a short name apart from that fucking 5 vendor shitty name.

 

[JonL]

dont mean to be obtuse but give me a blow job over taking one in the arse any day of the week

 

[LysergicEpiphany]

FFS stop putting up vast copies of vendor text.

6-APB ( is what has been allegedly sampled by a few people here recently)
I say this as no one has actually spent the money to get a proper test done to found out what it is.

6-APDB is the Nichols compound and this is what's called (4-Desoxy-MDA)


I don't think 6-APB has a short name apart from that fucking 5 vendor shitty name.

Has the Nichols compound been scheduled or something ? Cant seem to find it anywhere over the net ,this is why I 'presumed' the two were indifferent; Sheesh, talk about bite my head off mate. Peace.

 

[Peeping Tom]

^ Pretty sure I read somewhere in the previous reams and reams of this and the other 6-APB threads that 6-APDB is scheduled whereas 6-APB is not at present. I haven't got time to find exactly where this was posted tho hence not quoting it....

 

[Xorkoth]

Well LysergicEpiphany, the reason you got reprimanded was because you posted text from a vendor, which would easily allow anyone to search for that and find the vendor site.

 

[Mullered]

I hope to have a marquis reagent by the weekend and will be in a postion to test official vs unofficial batches, would it break any rules by posting the results here? Obviously there will be no hinting at sources whatsoever

 

[Delsyd]

those results would be welcome

 

[Mullered]

those results would be welcome

Cool. Cant make any promisses yet as I dont have the marquis. If its not here by Friday then there may not be anything left to test hehe, but I will try my best

 

[Policethepolice?]

I have seen this claimed legal because

2001 phenethylamine legislation does not apply because the ring has been substituted by a furan.

The UK phenethylamine act says

any compound structurally derived from phenethylamine an N-alkylphenethylamine, a methylphenethylamine, an N-alkyl-a-methylphenethylamine, a ethylphenethylamine, or an N-alkyl-a-ethylphenethylamine by substitution in the ring to any extent with alkyl, alkoxy, alkylenedioxy or halide substituents, whether or not further substituted in the ring by one or more other univalent substituents.

Now firstly the substituent appears to me to be THF not furan so I'm taking what this person has said with a pinch of salt.
Because of that I'm questioning it's legality. Could the substituent count as an alkoxy group (ethoxyamphetamine) in the eyes of the law, or would it be an ethyleneoxy group and therefore be exempt as claimed?

It's not exactly known whether it is legal, but when you are potentially facing life in prison and an unlimited fine, it's not a good risk to be taking. Hence why APDB is not being sold.

 

[Policethepolice?]

I have seen this claimed legal because

2001 phenethylamine legislation does not apply because the ring has been substituted by a furan.

The UK phenethylamine act says

any compound structurally derived from phenethylamine an N-alkylphenethylamine, a methylphenethylamine, an N-alkyl-a-methylphenethylamine, a ethylphenethylamine, or an N-alkyl-a-ethylphenethylamine by substitution in the ring to any extent with alkyl, alkoxy, alkylenedioxy or halide substituents, whether or not further substituted in the ring by one or more other univalent substituents.

Now firstly the substituent appears to me to be THF not furan so I'm taking what this person has said with a pinch of salt.
Because of that I'm questioning it's legality. Could the substituent count as an alkoxy group (ethoxyamphetamine) in the eyes of the law, or would it be an ethyleneoxy group and therefore be exempt as claimed?

 

[Sancho]

Does this look promising?

 

[Mullered]

Does this look promising?

That marquis result looks purple to me, if a little red. Seems in line with other tests from what I've seen (read)

 

[Seith]

You should not be testing on paper, use a ceramic plate.

I think I've seen one person mention a purple test result when testing with Marquis, until we can get some confirmed 6-APB tested no one should be able to answer your question.

The only advice I can give you is know your source.