• S E X
    L O V E +
    R E L A T I O N S H I P S


    ❤️ Welcome Guest! ❤️


    Posting Guidelines Bluelight Rules
  • SLR Moderators: Senior Staff

Love, sex and the male brain

rant*N*rave

Bluelighter
Joined
Jul 16, 2008
Messages
3,330
Location
None of yo' damn business
Link
Love, sex and the male brain
By Louann Brizendine, Special to CNN
STORY HIGHLIGHTS

Editor's note: Dr. Louann Brizendine is a member of the American Board of Psychiatry and Neurology and the National Board of Medical Examiners, and a clinical professor of psychiatry at the University of California, San Francisco. She is founder and director of the Women's Mood and Hormone Clinic. She wrote "The Female Brain" and, just released, "The Male Brain." Brizendine will appear on HLN's "The Joy Behar Show" Friday at 9.

(CNN) -- Although women the world over have been doing it for centuries, we can't really blame a guy for being a guy. And this is especially true now that we know that the male and female brains have some profound differences.Our brains are mostly alike. We are the same species, after all. But the differences can sometimes make it seem like we are worlds apart.

The "defend your turf" area -- dorsal premammillary nucleus -- is larger in the male brain and contains special circuits to detect territorial challenges by other males. And his amygdala, the alarm system for threats, fear and danger is also larger in men. These brain differences make men more alert than women to potential turf threats.Meanwhile, the "I feel what you feel" part of the brain -- mirror-neuron system -- is larger and more active in the female brain. So women can naturally get in sync with others' emotions by reading facial expressions, interpreting tone of voice and other nonverbal emotional cues.

Perhaps the biggest difference between the male and female brain is that men have a sexual pursuit area that is 2.5 times larger than the one in the female brain. Not only that, but beginning in their teens, they produce 20 to 25-fold more testosterone than they did during pre-adolescence. If testosterone were beer, a 9-year-old boy would be getting the equivalent of a cup a day. But a 15-year-old would be getting the equivalent of nearly two gallons a day. This fuels their sexual engines and makes it impossible for them to stop thinking about female body parts and sex.

And so begins the 'Man Trance'

All that testosterone drives the "Man Trance"-- that glazed-eye look a man gets when he sees breasts.As a woman who was among the ranks of the early feminists, I wish I could say that men can stop themselves from entering this trance. But the truth is, they can't. Their visual brain circuits are always on the lookout for fertile mates. Whether or not they intend to pursue a visual enticement, they have to check out the goods.

To a man, this is the most natural response in the world, so he's dismayed by how betrayed his wife or girlfriend feels when she sees him eyeing another woman. Men look at attractive women the way we look at pretty butterflies. They catch the male brain's attention for a second, but then they flit out of his mind. Five minutes later, while we're still fuming, he's deciding whether he wants ribs or chicken for dinner. He asks us, "What's wrong?" We say, "Nothing." He shrugs and turns on the TV. We smolder and fear that he'll leave us for another woman.

Not surprisingly, the different objectives that men and women have in mating games put us on opposing teams -- at least at first. The female brain is driven to seek security and reliability in a potential mate before she has sex. But a male brain is fueled to mate and mate again. Until, that is, he mates for life. Despite stereotypes to the contrary, the male brain can fall in love just as hard and fast as the female brain, and maybe more so. When he meets and sets his sights on capturing "the one," mating with her becomes his prime directive. And when he succeeds, his brain makes an indelible imprint of her. Lust and love collide and he's hooked.

The 'Doting Daddy Brain'

A man in hot pursuit of a mate doesn't even remotely resemble a devoted, doting daddy. But that's what his future holds. When his mate becomes pregnant, she'll emit pheromones that will waft into his nostrils, stimulating his brain to make more of a hormone called prolactin. Her pheromones will also cause his testosterone production to drop by 30 percent. These hormonal changes make him more likely to help with the baby. They also change his perceptual circuitry, increasing his ability to hear a baby cry, something many men can't do very well before their wives are pregnant.

And a word to the wise for all the young mothers who are reluctant to let your husbands hold and care for your newborn. The more hands-on care a father gives his infant, the more his brain aligns with the role of fatherhood. So, hand over the baby.

His emotions run deep

Although men have earned the reputation for being more stoic than women, they actually have stronger emotional reactions than we do. They just don't show it very often. Studies of men's faces show that the male brain's initial emotional reaction can be stronger than the female brain's. But within 2.5 seconds, he changes his face to hide the emotion, or even reverse it. The repeated practice of hiding his emotions gives men the classic poker face.

It's his poker face and his analytical response to personal problems that can put him in the doghouse. She's crying as she talks about what's wrong with the relationship, and instead of hugging her, his mind is racing to find a way to resolve the problem as soon as possible. With practice and because of the way their brains are wired, men use their analytical brain structures, not their emotional ones, to find a solution.

They enjoy this advantage, but women often take affront to it. When you're telling your husband your problem and he tries to solve it instead of hearing you out, you may think he's being insensitive. But that's not what's going on in his brain. He's working to solve the problem so he can relieve your pain as quickly as possible. Not because he doesn't care or doesn't want to listen, but because he loves you.

'Lovable Grandpas' and 'Grumpy Old Men'

As men age, the male brain hormones change and the male brain and body goes into the stage of life called andropause. The king of male hormones -- testosterone -- goes down and the queen of female hormones -- estrogen -- goes up. Whether Grandpa is your kids' hero or the grouch they hate to visit depends a lot on how he handles these hormonal changes. For example, if his testosterone levels drop to an abnormally low level, he can feel tired, irritable and even depressed. Some men in this condition seek hormone replacement therapy and others find relief in exercise, more frequent sex, and spending more time with other people.

The grandpa that kids can't wait to see is the one who's feeling the effects of the hormone oxytocin, often called the "cuddle hormone." He's fun and playful and likes to hear what his grandchildren have to say. He's much more patient with your children than he was with you, when you were growing up. The love circuits of the mature male brain can be hijacked by his grandkids, even more than they were by his own children.

The 'Lonely Hearts Club'

Not only is the mature male brain more receptive to closer bonds, but it's also more sensitive to loneliness. Nobody thrives when they're lonely, but it seems to take a major toll on older men. Sixty percent of divorces in couples over the age of 50 are initiated by women, leaving their husbands shell-shocked and devastated.

Once his wife leaves, unless he makes a point of socializing more with other people, his brain stops getting the social workout it needs to make him feel good about himself. If he becomes a loner, his social-approval circuits don't get activated. In brain scan studies of older males researchers have found that the brain's pleasure and reward areas, the VTA and the NAc, remain more active in men who are social. So don't begrudge the divorcee or the new widower some socializing and seeking female companionship.

The bottom line

The human brain is the best learning machine on the planet and human beings are capable of making major changes in our lives. But there are some things that the male brain and female brain are not likely to change anytime soon. And it makes more sense to deal with these brain realities, than to argue with them or ignoring them.

The best advice I have for women is make peace with the male brain. Let men be men.

The opinions expressed in this commentary are solely those of Louann Brizendine.
 
I'd say this is pretty much on the nose. I'm a big believer in sociobiology and a lot of this rings true with me. Whether or not its been scientifically tested I say this more or less fits with the bulk of what I see in the day to day world. Granted there are always exceptions.
 
Relate with everything said in the article that is applicable to me at 23! Two thumbs up and useful for females to read.
 
i enjoyed how this feminist has studied the male brain like a rat and her writings of it seem kind of a study of an animal. lol
anyway i cant disagree with anything except how a female thinks she understands the male brain.

the ending is the best part tho when a feminist says "The best advice I have for women is make peace with the male brain. Let men be men".

funny how feminists are always against what the males are naturally, but she stands "politically correct" in her final words.
 
Last edited:
I found that a very good read and it certainly made a lot of sense to me - especially the letting men bond with their new born babies part. In fact, i wonder if the mothers over the years taking over the full dealings with a new born is what has caused a lot of disconnections between fathers and their children as the kids grow up ... it just could very well be!

My father loves my sister and I, but he has never ever been able to show it in any other way than to be 'the good guy' or 'the funny guy' he made us laugh, a lot - but he has never ever been able to hug us or kiss us on the cheek. This used to bother me a little, as he has never ever said he loves us as well... i used to wonder why he is so un loving, and just more of a buddy to us - but now it makes sense.

My mother tells me that when i have children with my fiance after we're married, to not let him do much at all when the babies are new born because he probably wont have any interest anyways. What an old fashioned mentality! And now after reading this thread i feel more prepared for when we have children in the future :)

And just the rest of the extract as a whole is great and makes a lot of sense. I read it out to my fiance and he is in complete agreement with it all :)

Thanks heaps r*N*r for sharing! :D
 
funny how feminists are always against what the males are naturally

You have misunderstood how feminists work - they aren't against men, they are against not being treated as equal as men in all/most aspects. There is a difference.

I am not a feminist myself, but i do know people who are and that is generally what they stand for. They are against sexism. If they were sexist against men, that would defeat the purpose of their belief.
 
You have misunderstood how feminists work - they aren't against men, they are against not being treated as equal as men in all/most aspects. There is a difference.

I am not a feminist myself, but i do know people who are and that is generally what they stand for. They are against sexism. If they were sexist against men, that would defeat the purpose of their belief.

i never heard of equality in nature but surely feminists can use it as an excuse to try and gain power over societies with mostly men in command. of course not to say men are always on top of the chain in either western or any other based societies but most of the time that happens to be the case considering we are forced to accomplish name for ourselves in order to gain female attention and that is natural calling. many feminists tend to love to be in power tho so they will enjoy having the upper hand as well. it explains why many lesbians are feminists as well.
 
Okay well, you're making assumptions based on just your opinion and not actual facts. Either way, this thread isn't about feminists, nor men vs women. Let's keep this on topic.
 
Okay well, you're making assumptions based on just your opinion and not actual facts. Either way, this thread isn't about feminists, nor men vs women. Let's keep this on topic.

hah actually this thread is created in such way it can only start a debate of men vs women. :)
 
No not at all, and if that is the case than any further posts heading in such a way will be removed and if necessary warnings and infractions will be issued :)
 
No not at all, and if that is the case than any further posts heading in such a way will be removed and if necessary warnings and infractions will be issued :)

lol well i know exactly where this thread will be headed if people were free enough to reply to it, but i see u have the upper hand in the case so enjoy dictating the situation.
 
People are free to reply to it providing they aren't going down the road of making this a sexist thread, on either sides that is :) As a moderator of the forum i am here to make sure things are kept in line, yes. Now, enough of that' we've both had our say - back on topic please.
 
Hmm... I relate to being mesmerized by attractive women in my field of view. I consider this completely harmless as long as I don't oggle some chick in front of my wife, don't make the woman think I'm a pervert, and don't actually hit on her.

What I don't relate to is being more analytically driven. I've always been a keen communicator. When my wife (or other previous women in my life) had emotional issues, I always somehow knew better than to stay logical and propose a 'Mr. Fixit' type solution. I always just instinctively knew that the only way she'd feel better is if I made her feeling better my ultimate goal in my choice of words, whether or not I had an answer to her problem. I've never suffered the stereotypical male problem of being too much of an analyzer of systems, when connecting and relating to another human being was what was really called for.

So instead, what has suffered has been my friendships with other men, rather than my romantic relationships with women. I don't relate so much to the male form of bonding, which is much more about doing, than deep or substantive talking. I like to do both. Often at once. It's funny, because I'm not physically or mentally weak at all. But just this personality style of mine gets me the 'wuss' treatment from a lot of more manly men.

I take pride in being one to buck statistical trends like this.
 
you may think he's being insensitive. But that's not what's going on in his brain. He's working to solve the problem so he can relieve your pain as quickly as possible. Not because he doesn't care or doesn't want to listen, but because he loves you

I always realize about halfway through when my girlfriend is telling me about some trouble, that my whole thinking process has switched gears and started running with the problem. She's upset about something, and I've already given her 3 (in my mind) ways to fix the whole thing by the time she's halfway in.

I realize what I'm doing by that point, but usually I've already thrown out a fix or two. It takes a conscious and willful effort to just listen.
 
for tha sake of grument

'Love, Sex and The Male Brain’, or How to Write a Pop Science Book without Evidence


A few years ago I read Louann Brizendine’s book, “The Female Brain”, and marveled at her ability to take weak correlations and turn them into impressively scientific-sounding “facts.”

This really is a talent, I think, though not one that has earned her many fans in the science community. That Brizendine is a trained psychiatrist, and a member of the American Board of Psychiatry and Neurology, has not helped her credibility in science circles—in fact, many feel it only makes her more culpable, since she really ought to know better.

What I think she knows, however, is that popular science books don’t have to be evidence-based to become best sellers, and she’s no doubt correct. Her just-released book, “The Male Brain”, will demonstrate that marketplace truism once again, and once again she is raising the ire of scientists.

A few examples will better illustrate why this tension exists. Brizendine likes to say that men and women are very much alike, but different in a few crucial ways. Fair enough. How are we different?

For one, she claims the “I feel what you feel part of the brain–mirror-neuron system–is larger and more active in the female brain. So women can naturally get in sync with others’ emotions by reading facial expressions, interpreting tone of voice and other nonverbal emotional cues.”

What’s interesting is that the “mirror-neuron system” at the core of her claim may or may not be a “system” at all; in fact, whether mirror neurons even exist is still a point of neuroscientific contention. At the very least, how these neurons work is debatable and there’s anything but widespread agreement about what they do. But Brizendine makes it sound as if the matter is settled and we can confidently draw sweeping conclusions.

But take another look at her statement. Is the conclusion she’s reaching a paradigm-breaking discovery? Not at all. It’s just a regurgitation of the same stereotype we’ve heard for years, that women are more empathetic, more in sync with emotions and better communicators. Only now, according to Brizendine, we have a grandiose scientific underpinning for believing it.

Here’s another claim: “Perhaps the biggest difference between the male and female brain is that men have a sexual pursuit area that is 2.5 times larger than the one in the female brain.” This statement begs the question, where exactly is this “pursuit area”? The reader shouldn’t expect an answer—at least not one with scientific validity—because in all likelihood no such “area” exists. At minimum we should be asking how this skirt-chasing control center was identified.

This is an example of a trend that has taken over popular psychology and neuroscience publishing: using correlational fMRI data (which areas of the brain show activity under various conditions) to create the appearance of solid, rigorously researched conclusions (e.g. identification of a “pursuit area”). The problem, as recent studies have shown, is that fMRI often produces different results under the same testing conditions, and no one is exactly sure why. This fracture in the reproducibility chain doesn’t necessarily invalidate fMRI results, but it should (and generally does) stop researchers from claiming that the results are conclusive. At best, they are suggestive, at least for now. As the technology improves that may change. In addition, how to interpret fMRI results is an ongoing debate.

None of those issues are a problem for Brizendine, who, like so many popular science writers, is more than willing to stake a series of claims on shaky evidence that sounds ironclad. So we shouldn’t be surprised when she says something like this:

All that testosterone drives the “Man Trance”– that glazed-eye look a man gets when he sees breasts. As a woman who was among the ranks of the early feminists, I wish I could say that men can stop themselves from entering this trance. But the truth is, they can’t. Their visual brain circuits are always on the lookout for fertile mates. Whether or not they intend to pursue a visual enticement, they have to check out the goods. CNN, 3/24/2010

Brizendine arrives at this conclusion by way of a connect-the-dots methodology: Testosterone plus “visual brain circuits” equals “man trance.” It sounds as though she’s referencing a well-researched phenomenon, and yet I can’t find even a mention of the “man trance” anywhere in PubMed or Google Scholar. Why I can’t isn’t a mystery—she made up the term. That’s fine. An author should be allowed to coin new terms, as long as the underlying facts are solid. But here’s where we have the bigger problem—they’re not. The two studies in PubMed that address the testosterone-visual circuitry connection are about the sexual behavior of birds and goldfish.

Have we developed a sophisticated method of detecting a male bird or goldfish’s entrancement with female bird and goldfish breasts? I’m pretty sure not. This does, however, illustrate another disappointing trend in pop science publishing: extrapolating what sound like compelling conclusions from preliminary (and sometimes quirky) studies–many of which won’t ever be reproduced.

The trick here, once again, is how the “conclusion” is packaged, not how well it’s supported. Every time Brizendine goes on a talk show and discusses the “man trance,” what will stick is the clever, sound-bite ready term. Whether or not the term is evidence-based won’t matter, and usually no one will ask.

Many more examples could be addressed, but I’m sure by now the point is clear: in books like Brizendine’s, we’re not getting the results of science, we’re getting a dose of scientainment. Having it delivered to us by a well-credentialed professional makes it all the more appealing, and—in the time-honored tradition of relying on the authority of “experts”—all the more unassailable.

Unfortunately, the takeaways from these books aren’t enriching the knowledge pool. Instead, they reinforce our natural tendencies to simplify, categorize and stereotype—tendencies that for most of us aren’t in need of reinforcement.

http://trueslant.com/daviddisalvo/2...to-write-a-pop-science-book-without-evidence/
 
Top