• Psychedelic Drugs Welcome Guest
    View threads about
    Posting RulesBluelight Rules
    PD's Best Threads Index
    Social ThreadSupport Bluelight
    Psychedelic Beginner's FAQ
  • PD Moderators: Esperighanto | JackARoe |

Entheogenic & Psychoactive Plants by Genera

T

Teotzlcoatl

Bluelighter
Joined
Feb 5, 2010
Messages
779
Entheogens (Botanicals which cause entheogenic or psychedelic effects)-


*Amanita muscaria (var. muscaria) ~ “Fly Agaric”
*Anadenanthera colubrine (var. cebil) & Anadenanthera peregrina (var. peregrina) ~ "Cebil" & “Yopo”
*Argyreia nervosa (var. nervosa) ~ "Hawaiian Baby Woodrose”
*Banisteriopsis caapi ~ “Vine of the Souls” or “Ayahuasca”
*Diplopterys cabrerana ~ “Chaliponga” or “Oco’ Yage”
*Heimia myrtifolia & Heimia salicifolia ~ "Sinicuichi" or “Sun-Opener”
*Ipomoea tricolor & Ipomoea violacea ~ “Morning Glory”
*Lophophora williamsii ~ “Peyotl” or “Peyote”
*Mimosa tenuiflora (syn. hostilis) ~ "Jurema"
*Psilocybe species & Panaeolus species ~ “'Shrooms”
*Psychotria viridis ~ “Chacruna”
*Salvia divinorum ~ "Pipiltzintzintli" or “Diviner’s Sage”
*Tabernanthe iboga ~ “Iboga”
*Trichocereus (syn. Echinopsis) pachanoi & Trichocereus peruvianus ~ “San Pedro” & “Peruvian Torch”
*Turbina (syn. Rivea) corymbosa ~ “Ololiuqui”
*Virola calophylla & Virola theiodora ~ "Epena"
 
Last edited:
Oh lord... here we go...

What you think is "pachanoi" is really the predominant cultivar pachanoi also known as the "P.C." clone.

REAL pachanoi from Ecuador and Peru is much, much more potent.

Also the Trichocereus "peruvianus" which is common on the market is actually T. cuzcoensis and is very weak.

Again REAL T. peruvianus is much more potent.

So what your saying is semi-incorrect, unless your referring to the commonly found clones on the market.

Each clone has it's own unique profile, keep that in mind.

I could have added T. bridgesii to the list, but as I said I tried to pin-point the major species... perhaps I'll add it tho.

See this nexus thread for more info-

https://www.dmt-nexus.com/forum/default.aspx?g=posts&t=6935&p=1
https://www.dmt-nexus.com/forum/default.aspx?g=posts&t=2430


Ask Mr.Smith or Mr.Trout if you don't believe me (you do know who that is right?)

Here is a link from Trout's page-
http://www.largelyaccurateinformationmedia.com/pedro/pedro_012.html

If you have the book "Trout's Notes on San Pedro" then check it out, if you don't, buy it.

Seems to me that someone who claims to know so much about these things would know that!
Click to expand...

I know my shit when it comes to cacti. I'd wager I know a hell of alot more than you.

If you want to know more read all the cacti posts on the Corroboree.
 
Last edited:
I don't really see any descriptions. All I see is something resembling an encyclopedic index covered in an inch of fatally bored dust.
 
I'm not sure I see any dust...

This is a good starting point for those just learning about psychoactive plants.

I'll try and add some descriptions sometime.

If y'all are interested... ask about a specific plant.
 
I mean nobody even posted in the thread about Wade Davis at Massey, so I have a feeling most people here aren't going to be interested in that kind of stuff, they just seem concerned with getting high mostly.
 
I wonder if any of the Claviceps species are considered entheogenic or psychedelic. I'd love to know if anyone ever experimented with C paspali as it was hinted at as potentially being the basis of the kykeon.


Yours sincerely Mr Concerned with getting high - amongst other things
 
Teotzlcoatl said:
I mean nobody even posted in the thread about Wade Davis at Massey, so I have a feeling most people here aren't going to be interested in that kind of stuff, they just seem concerned with getting high mostly.
Click to expand...

And all you seem to be interested in is masturbating to plants and berating other people for not having the same views as you!
 
Ok settle down please. Everyone.

Teo, take a hint. You may or may not possess valuable knowledge...
What is very important to everyone here is that you dose the offering of that knowledge in proportion to the interest. Are you familiar with the basics of trade, supply and demand?

Adjust the supply of your info to the demand of it, or the value of what you stand for will plummet here. Now, would that be what does your knowledge justice? No, it's a shame.

Besides, I haven't even ONCE seen you talking in depth about something, only making long lists and posting links and stuff. And this is not me asking for you to talk about anything. Instead, tone it down.

I am done discussing all this for today. Ruins my mood.
 
Last edited:
I left that up a long time... it seems fairly obvious to me people here aren't interested in the scientific side of things.

I bet some of you don't even know who Wade Davis is!

Ok settle down please. Everyone.
Click to expand...

I'd be glad to follow this advice as long as the others do as well.
 
Teotzlcoatl said:
I left that up a long time... it seems fairly obvious to me people here aren't interested in the scientific side of things.

I bet some of you don't even know who Wade Davis is!
Click to expand...

If its "fairly obvious" people here are not interested in the scientific side of things why not just take your pretentious posts to another forum...

and, MY GOD! some people dont know who Wade Davis is 8)

your incredibly tiresome, P&S is a place for discussion and information, not a place to put others down for what they enjoy partaking in. the thing is i like a lot of your ideas, just not your attitude.
 
Mine looks more comprehensive.

I have another list which covers psychoactive animals... I'm sure y'all will find that interesting!
 
Teotzlcoatl said:
Mine looks more comprehensive.

I have another list which covers psychoactive animals... I'm sure y'all will find that interesting!
Click to expand...

The point of Wikipedia is that people such as yourself who are so motivated to write encyclopedic information about what they care about can contribute to an encyclopedia.
 
"I left that up a long time... it seems fairly obvious to me people here aren't interested in the scientific side of things."

God, you're an idiot. You keep saying things that are empirically false, and we keep correcting you. All that stuff you don't seem to understand that we keep trying to explain to you? Yeah, *that* is the "scientific side of things," not your useless lists of plant names.
 
Teotzlcoatl said:
I left that up a long time... it seems fairly obvious to me people here aren't interested in the scientific side of things.

I bet some of you don't even know who Wade Davis is!
Click to expand...

You're right, I don't know who Wade Davis is and I honestly couldn't give a flying fuck. Why should I, just because you do?

In all honesty my main standpoint is that I prefer synthetic or extracted psychedelics. Why? They are pure. You know what is in you, and you can gauge things pretty easily. Plants contain a bunch of shit and toxins, cause shitloads of nausea, and put a lot of people off psychedelics instantaneously by flooding them with ill feelings that are unrelated to the drug itself.

I'd rather ingest pure mescaline than a foot of dirty cactus. I'd rather offer someone pure mescaline than tell them they have to eat a foot of dirty cactus.

I am however interested in the plants themselves. Mostly the cultivation of them, where I might source them and how best to look after them. If you were interested in the science side, you would be more interested in extracting the pure products to identify the true effects of each drug. You seem to be more interested in the "spiritual" aspect. Plant spirits and all that stuff.
 
^^^ This. The guy who irrationally dislikes synthetics solely because they are synthetic has no business telling us that *we* are the ones who are ignorant or uninterested in the science.

Wade Davis is a crackpot who thought Haitian mystics had a powder that could turn people into hypnotic slaves, which he attributed as the origin of Haitian zombie myths. Empirical research and attempts to reproduce his results found that the compound he claimed was responsible (tetrodotoxin) had none of the properties he attributed to it and wasn't even in the powder samples he collected in high enough concentration to do much of anything. TTX poisoning is incurable and fatal but certainly not hypnotic. IIRC, Davis also exhumed a corpse to test some theory that dead human flesh was involved in the 'zombie powder' as well, raising serious ethics issues... If that is Teo's idea of "drug science," well, I can see why his delusional ass gets banned a lot.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top