Scientists Find the Gene that Produces THC

sdripper

Bluelighter
Joined
Jun 7, 2009
Messages
272
Location
Steward of the Forest
By Stuart Fox Posted 09.15.2009 at 1:03 pm 7 Comments


Kids, Listen to What Nate Dogg Tells You
In one of the few scientific developments likely to interest both the Governor of North Dakota and Method Man, scientists at the University of Minnesota have identified the genes in cannabis that allow the plant to produce THC. Finding the genes opens the path to either create drug-free hemp plants for industrial purposes, or to develop plants with much higher concentrations of the psychotropic chemical.

Publishing in the Journal of Experimental Botany, the researchers note that they specifically targeted the genes responsible for generating the drug-filled hairs highlighted in many a High Times photo spread. By impairing or encouraging the growth of those hairs, scientists could gain precise control over the level of THC in the crop.

This development has important consequences for both the medicinal and industrial use of hemp.



On the industrial side, states like North Dakota have been looking to change state law to allow them to raise hemp as a cash crop, for oil and rope production. The ability to create hemp that doesn't contain any banned substances would allow Dakotans to sow the crop without any changes in the law.

On the opposite end of the spectrum, precise control of the doses of THC found in pot could greatly enhance the medicinal marijuana industry. Currently, dosage is controlled through haphazard breeding and selection, not precise measurements as with most other medications.

It should also be noted that THC is not the only psychoactive compound found in marijuana, so more research is needed before the University of Minnesota scientists can completely control the potency of their crops.

Finally, how this new discovery will affect the pizza delivery business remains to be seen.

http://www.popsci.com/scitech/article/2009-09/scientists-find-thc-gene-hemp
 
There should be a lot of genes that produce THC, it's not a small biosynthetic pathway. Nor should it be hard to knock out.
 
Why are scientist doing this kinda research? Industrial hemp? Huh, is there a big demand for that? Keep it real!

I wonder who is sponsering this kinda research? These things cost money, so apparently someone is interested in these genes, but for what reason? I bet they want to patent it! It's definetely not for the benefit of the recreational pot smoker, I think that's pretty obvious!

In my perspective these scientist are just making cash with research that never should be done, because it will only end up in abuse. I don't want weed with 85% THC, the stuff they are selling nowadays is allready way to strong... I don't want GMO crops in generally, simply because there are many indications that these plants are not safe! So IMO this ain't no good news at all, allthough I can understand that it might look like that to some.:\
 
As far as harm reduction goes the stronger the weed the less carcinogens have to be inhaled. Weed can't be too strong, it can just be too easy to go overboard. If you are smart about your intake you can get the same dose from shit weed or potent weed.
 
As far as harm reduction goes the stronger the weed the less carcinogens have to be inhaled.

Yes, but is that really an issue? It's not like you're gonna need to smoke gigantic amounts of pot to get high of some organic weed with a more moderate THC percentage.

Besides, I always thought that it's very unlikely that you'll get cancer due to smoking pot. In fact I think that it's more likely that cannabis has an anticarcinogenic effect (if used in moderation), but I guess some studies need to be done...


Weed can't be too strong, it can just be too easy to go overboard.

Yes and no. For me, organically grown weed can't be strong enough.

But the thing is that weed is curently stronger due to usage of chemical substances (growth stimulators and so on) and this also has an impact on your health (smoking those residues can't be healthy). Organic weed will never be as strong as the stuff they are currently still selling in coffee shops.

The same thing happens with our food: vegetables are being sprayed with pesticides, cows are given hormones and antibiotics and so on. The ganja you find in coffee shops is not a natural product and I notice that when I smoke it.
So it's not simply the fact that it is too strong, it's also the fact that it's impure!
And nobody is actually controlling it, no one has determined an acceptable residue limit, so those illegal growers can do what they want.


If you are smart about your intake you can get the same dose from shit weed or potent weed.

Yes, I'm trying to do that. The difference is that if the weed was organically grown you might be able to smoke a joint, but nowadays that seem crazy, because the THC % is just too high. Therefor I believe it's recommended to use a pipe or other smoking device so you can inhale little amounts.
 
Why are scientist doing this kinda research? Industrial hemp? Huh, is there a big demand for that? Keep it real!

I wonder who is sponsering this kinda research? These things cost money, so apparently someone is interested in these genes, but for what reason? I bet they want to patent it! It's definetely not for the benefit of the recreational pot smoker, I think that's pretty obvious!

In my perspective these scientist are just making cash with research that never should be done, because it will only end up in abuse. I don't want weed with 85% THC, the stuff they are selling nowadays is allready way to strong... I don't want GMO crops in generally, simply because there are many indications that these plants are not safe! So IMO this ain't no good news at all, allthough I can understand that it might look like that to some.:\

Who the hell are you and why are your views so fucked up lmao. This is an awesome discovery, It gives more legitimate medicinal use now that it can be more accurately determined the strength it contains. Not to mention that there are numerous industrial applications hemp can be used for. Paper, rope, spices, fuel, clothing, oils, and even concrete blocks, etc... the list goes on and on. This can save countless trees and other resources.

http://www.lightparty.com/Health/Hemp4.html
 
Who the hell are you and why are your views so fucked up lmao.
[/url]

lol +1


Stronger pot = less carcinogens = better for you . end

And all your complaints about organic pot not being strong enough could come to an end here. You wouldn't need to use all the crazy chems anymore to get amazing pot if you had a seed line with god like genetics.


Just think of it as speeding up selective breeding...

We could end up with the pot equivalent of these!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nmkj5gq1cQU&feature=fvw
 
Who the hell are you and why are your views so fucked up lmao.

What happened to plur? ;)

I know what possibilities industrial hemp offers, but currently few are actually growing hemp for such purposes. Where can I buy hemp clothing? Even ropes are hard to find... Is the paper industry using it? Not that I'm aware of: I never saw a book or magazine printed on hemp paper.

If you can't see my viewpoint that's you're "problem" ... In my perspective you are being naive if you think you will actually benefit from this.

It is a good thing that weed gets stongers, as long as this is being done in a natural way. If it implies changing the genes, I pass. Just as I don't wanna eat GMO soy, I definetely don't wanna smoke GMO weed. And if it ever comes to this, GMO weed will be even more expensive than "normal" weed, but I guess you ppl believe this will make it cheaper.

Peace out
 
What happened to plur? ;)

I know what possibilities industrial hemp offers, but currently few are actually growing hemp for such purposes. Where can I buy hemp clothing? Even ropes are hard to find... Is the paper industry using it? Not that I'm aware of: I never saw a book or magazine printed on hemp paper.

I can't figure out if you're serious or just jerking our chain. Hemp is mostly illegal to produce in the United States, with only a few small exceptions. Even the states that have defied federal law and passed legislation in favor of hemp production have not actually started producing hemp because of resistance from the DEA. In European states that do produce hemp, the cost of hemp is ~6 times that of wood pulp. There are hemp fabrics out there for sale, you're just not looking hard enough. They are unpopular because hemp is generally a very course material (among other reasons). Think that might have something to do with it?

If you can't see my viewpoint that's you're [sic] "problem" ... In my perspective you are being naive if you think you will actually benefit from this.

No, it's not. You need to take a course in debate (as well as genetics). The burden is on your shoulders to convince others of the validity of your argument. It is certainly not our problem if we don't immediately swallow everything your regurgitate.

It is a good thing that weed gets stongers, as long as this is being done in a natural way. If it implies changing the genes, I pass. Just as I don't wanna eat GMO soy, I definetely don't wanna smoke GMO weed. And if it ever comes to this, GMO weed will be even more expensive than "normal" weed, but I guess you ppl believe this will make it cheaper.

Ignorance breeds fear. It's fairly obvious you know very little or nothing about genetic engineering. Consuming GMOs does not give you cancer, fuck with your genome, cause birth defects, or any of that crap. If you know anything about genetics or biochemistry, you'd know that it isn't a matter of probability, it's a matter of certainty. And natural does not equal safer, that's an extremely uneducated viewpoint (and unfortunately extremely common misconception.
 
The first rule of science club is: "There's no such thing as certainty."

Either that or something about "not talking about science club". I forget which.

I shouldn't have used the word certainty. I paused while typing that, but decided to go ahead and post because it was quite apparent to me that I wasn't talking to a scientist anyway. It isn't certain (because nothing in the universe is certain). It's not certain that the sun is going to rise tomorrow, but I think it's safe to assume that it will based on the past several centuries of scientific observation.

I simply meant that there is very very little doubt in the scientific community that genetically modified crops are safe. That's all.
 
I'm serious

Hemp is mostly illegal to produce in the United States, with only a few small exceptions. Even the states that have defied federal law and passed legislation in favor of hemp production have not actually started producing hemp because of resistance from the DEA. In European states that do produce hemp, the cost of hemp is ~6 times that of wood pulp. There are hemp fabrics out there for sale, you're just not looking hard enough. They are unpopular because hemp is generally a very course material (among other reasons). Think that might have something to do with it?

This is kinda funny to me, because now you are actually supporting my idea! I knew most of the facts you summed up above (apart from the production cost comparison to wood pulp) and that's just the whole damn point I was trying to make. Industrial hemp is not a succes story, so I was very surprised someone brought that forward! How could the discovery of the gene for THC be beneficial for industrial hemp applications? Please enlighten me.

No, it's not. You need to take a course in debate (as well as genetics). The burden is on your shoulders to convince others of the validity of your argument. It is certainly not our problem if we don't immediately swallow everything your regurgitate.

I believe it's recommended not to jump to conclusions too fast! What I meant to say is that if you are so narrow minded that you're not even willing to read my post, then a debate is pointless. I know the rules of a debate, but I'm not gonna discuss with ppl who are prejudice or who don't have the possibility to see things from different viewpoints. Obviously this remark is not aimed at everyone!!

Ignorance breeds fear. It's fairly obvious you know very little or nothing about genetic engineering. Consuming GMOs does not give you cancer, fuck with your genome, cause birth defects, or any of that crap.

Thank you, poindexter! Why must you judge me like that? Why you think I know nothing about genetic engineering? I never said what specific consequences are linked to the consumption of GMO food, but I do know that there is alot of evidence that it's not safe! Therefor I apply the precautionary principle, if you ever heard about that? There is no scientifical consensus about the safety of GMO crops, there are no peer reviewed studies, but the bio tech lobby is very strong. They've invested in these technologies and now they want the profits they think they deserve.

If you know anything about genetics or biochemistry, you'd know that it isn't a matter of probability, it's a matter of certainty.

You should be aware that not all scientist are trully independent, many are being sponsered by the bio tech industry. So it's quite logical that at universities they are actually promoting these techniques and are trying to minimize all possible flaws. It seems to me that you are not a very sceptical person...In my perspective you are only proving that you're the nitwit in here. Certainty? :\ Yeah, dream on 8)

And if you must know: I do have a scientifical background and I did follow courses of biochemistry at a respectable university.

And natural does not equal safer, that's an extremely uneducated viewpoint (and unfortunately extremely common misconception.

Sigh, now I am beginning to wonder wheter your respons is sincere or wheter you're just trying to annoy me, 'cause you seem to deliberatly misinterpret my words.
 
If you can't grow Cannabis, grow Cannabinus!

Hibiscus cannabinus - "Kenaf" - the world's second best natural resource


We already have drug-free hemp and it's called Kenaf. We need to start growing Kenaf on a widescale basis like, right now. For more information about Hibiscus cannabinus, please visit the Kenaf section at my latest project (under construction):

http://www.cannabisreeducationteam.com
 
I was reading something related to this article and it said they could place the gene in any plant, resulting in tomatoes or strawberries or whatever you wish, potatoes, watermelons all of it to produce thc, imagine eating a baked potato and getting baked !
 
^lol I remember that article, it then went on to say they had put the magic gene-juice into a spray bottle that would be sold for $5 =p

There were 'currently working on a maple tree' lol

I thought this article was going to be the same joke when I saw the title haha
 
Top