@Zopiclone bandit On second thoughts I agree with APF about the Wedinos error rate. It is very difficult to estimate, when basing it on own your personal experience alone. I suspect APF is basing it on a wider circle of people that have used the service, and is therefore more likely to have a more accurate error rate, than my estimate of less than 10%. Which I would now take back, and agree with the 2%.
The bottom line is they provide an excellent and free service, and they are right the vast majority of the time. It seems the odd error here and there is easy to spot, as it's just so out of place. Like that example I had of nicotine or caffeine supposedly being in my benzos. It just seemed obviously wrong.
I really would hate to put you, or anyone you know, off using them, as I'd imagine if you sent off a few samples of different gear, and saw what each one actually contained after testing, you might be able to develop a taste or sense as to what each batch actually is, according to it's appearance, and smell, and how it runs etc....
It could save your life one day, for example if you'd had a previous batch tested as containing fent or nitazenes as the primary ingredient, and then any new batches that were along the same lines, you'd possibly know. Without needing a further test.
I'm not 100% sure if I'm right about that though, but it makes sense to me that once you've had certain things tested as kosher, or for containing something else, then you will have that as a future reference point, and may be able to tell by the appearance, taste, smell, effects, how it runs etc...
It's generally served me well with benzos, knowing what the genuine ones are supposed to look and taste like.