• Current Events & Politics
    Welcome Guest
    Please read before posting:
    Forum Guidelines Bluelight Rules
  • Current Events & Politics Moderators: deficiT | tryptakid | Foreigner

2024 US Presidential Election

No. Just look for yourself instead of being hyperbolic

https://www.donaldjtrump.com/agenda47

yeah, before the last election he said he'd build a wall and mexico would pay for it.

never happened.

he said he'd repeal obamacare and replace it with something much better.

never happened.

he said he'd simplify the tax code.

never happened.

he said he'd boost economic growth to 3.5% (per year on average).

never happened.

he said he'd eliminate gun-free zones in schools.

never happened.

he said he'd crate a national right to concealed carry.

never happened.

he said he'd champion a constitutional amendment to impose term limits on congress members.

never happened.

he said he'd rebuild the country's infrastructure.

never happened.

he said he'd never take vacations.

he took plenty.

and so on.

but it's great you think he'll do what he says he'll do this time round...

alasdair
 
Last edited:
yeah, before the last election he said he'd build a wall and mexico would pay for it.

never happened.

he said he'd repeal obamacare and replace it with something much better.

never happened.

he said he'd simplify the tax code.

never happened.

he said he'd boost economic growth to 3.5% (per year on average).

never happened.

he said he'd eliminate gun-free zones in schools.

never happened.

he said he'd crate a national rigth to concealed carry.

never happened.

he said he'd champion a constitutional amendment to impose term limits on congress members.

never happened.

he said he'd rebuild the country's infrastructure.

never happened.

he said he'd never take vacations.

he took plenty.

and so on.

but it's great you think he'll do what he says he'll do this time round...

alasdair
how in 2024 we got people that still can't identify a grifter is wild to me.
 
Honest question. Kamala Harris announced that she had secured enough delegates to clinch the nomination.

Wtf does that mean? Nobody voted for her. Some ten or thirty pre selected bribed government delegates decided to anoint her the nominee?

This is “democracy” democrats are so rabidly screaming about saving?

Nobody voted for her. Nobody whatsoever. Now she’s automatically the nominee?

This isn’t democracy.

I like her way more than Donald or Biden but she pushing an assault weapons ban also so she’s shooting herself in the foot. This ain’t running in CA, she’s trying to win swing states.
 
Last edited:
when she says she has "secured enough delegates to clinch the nomination" she means that she has secured the endorsement of enough delegates (i.e .more than 1976) to win the nomination in the first round of voting.

but it's meaningless until the vote of the party delegates is official. that will happen after the virtual roll call vote ahead of the dnc.

so, simply put, she's not the nominee yet. but she almost certainly will be.

alasdair
 
Honest question. Kamala Harris announced that she had secured enough delegates to clinch the nomination.

Wtf does that mean? Nobody voted for her. Some ten or thirty pre selected bribed government delegates decided to anoint her the nominee?

This is “democracy” democrats are so rabidly screaming about saving?

Nobody voted for her. Nobody whatsoever. Now she’s automatically the nominee?

This isn’t democracy.

I like her way more than Donald or Biden but she pushing an assault weapons ban also so she’s shooting herself in the foot. This ain’t running in CA, she’s trying to win swing states.
We did vote for her. We voted for Biden/Harris. If Biden can't serve, Harris steps up. That's how it should work in a democracy. It's way too late to redo the primary. How do you think it should be done?
 
Lol, the media isn't hated enough



GTQNH5DXIAMYZYb


 
"Here’s Biden appointing Kamala Harris to be his border czar to deal with illegal immigration," a narrator says in a video the Republican National Committee posted on its X account, @GOP. "And here are a record number of illegal immigrants — 10 million and counting — flooding over the border after Harris was put in charge of stopping illegal immigration."

We’ve repeatedly fact-checked claims about the number of people entering the U.S. illegally under Biden. The federal data tracks how many times officials encountered a person trying to cross the southern border, but it doesn’t reflect the number of people let in. And if one person tries to cross the border multiple times, that counts as multiple encounters, even if it’s the same person.

For this fact-check, we’re focused on the scope of Harris’ border responsibilities.

"Border Czar Kamala Harris' reversal of President Trump's immigration policies has created an unprecedented and illegal immigration, humanitarian and national security crisis on our southern border," Trump campaign National Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt told PolitiFact in a statement.

But Biden didn’t put Harris in charge of overseeing border security.

In a meeting with Harris in March 2021, Biden said Harris would lead U.S. diplomatic efforts and work with officials in Mexico, Guatemala, El Salvador and Honduras to stem migration to the U.S. Biden said that when he was vice president, he "got a similar assignment" and that the Obama administration secured $700 million to help countries in Central America.

"One of the ways we learned is that if you deal with the problems in country, it benefits everyone. It benefits us, it benefits the people, and it grows the economies there," Biden said then.

Biden asked Harris "to be the chief diplomatic officer with Central American countries" and address the root causes that make people leave their home countries, said Michelle Mittelstadt, communications director for the Migration Policy Institute, a nonpartisan think tank.

Managing the border "has always been" the Homeland Security secretary’s role, Mittelstadt said.



Which would explain why "she was never to the border" as well. :rolleyes: Republicans lie. It's a thing.
 
Last edited:
Harris is not a person of substance and will change nothing. She will do what the foreign policy blob tell her to do, raising the risk of global and nuclear war further. When pushed on any issue in interviews or debates she has revealed a lack of character.

The major domestic achievement of the Trump administration was tax cuts for the wealthy. He cares not at all about the working class. He wants to plummet into climate catastrophe at an even greater rate than we are currently.

The world is headed to civilizational collapse due to climate change and / or nuclear war. Neither party has any plan to or desire to work to prevent collapse. No they are interested in promoting US Corporate interests and US state power.

This election is a circus for the proles to make them think they have a choice.
 
The world is headed to civilizational collapse due to climate change and / or nuclear war
Just going to throw this wild prediction in here. Trump is going to win; I think there's going to be some wild shit going down with Trump and Russia, and particularly to do with Trump's (and Russia's) connection to Nikola Tesla, in the next few years. Trump's uncle was the man in charge of examining Nikola Tesla's [stolen] possessions upon his death. Russia was given parts of the plan for the 'death ray'.

I don't know how, maybe we'll see a demonstration of a weapon even more powerful than an atomic bomb, or Tesla's 'death ray' used to neutralize ICBM's or something in Ukraine.

It just sort of occurred to me the other day. There has been this long and ongoing cultural expression in films etc, e.g. The Hunt for Red October, that Russia has advanced electrical warfare capability. Always involving plasmas or some exotic electrical capability. It never really occurred to me before that this might be some form of predictive programming. In recent years there's been a lot of talk about lasers, particularly from the Anglo-American establishment. May be we're about to see something completely off the wall?

* foil hat off *
 
We did vote for her. We voted for Biden/Harris. If Biden can't serve, Harris steps up. That's how it should work in a democracy. It's way too late to redo the primary. How do you think it should be done?
She’s not taking over Bidens duties she’s running as a new candidate in 2024.

You can’t be serious with that reasoning
 
"Just going to throw this wild prediction in here. Trump is going to win;"

i don't think it's that wild. he's the betting favourite and a lot of people - democrats included - think he'll win.

but, great to see your prediction given you have absolutely no interest in u.s. politics :)

alasdair
 
Harris is not a person of substance and will change nothing. She will do what the foreign policy blob tell her to do, raising the risk of global and nuclear war further. When pushed on any issue in interviews or debates she has revealed a lack of character.

The major domestic achievement of the Trump administration was tax cuts for the wealthy. He cares not at all about the working class. He wants to plummet into climate catastrophe at an even greater rate than we are currently.

The world is headed to civilizational collapse due to climate change and / or nuclear war. Neither party has any plan to or desire to work to prevent collapse. No they are interested in promoting US Corporate interests and US state power.

This election is a circus for the proles to make them think they have a choice.
yawn.. and double yawn. Person of substance.. please tell me more?

Get to work on your end of days shelter? Don’t forget the vitamins mate.
 
She’s not taking over Bidens duties she’s running as a new candidate in 2024.

You can’t be serious with that reasoning
Again. What would you suggest? There's no time for a primary and this does follow the voter's will, we did vote for her.
There is nothing in the Constitution about picking a candidate. Nothing about political parties at all.
This is just one of the many, desperate attacks coming from the Repugs at the mo'. Are you gonna call her an adulteress next?

This is trying to nullify the voter's will. And whether someone who has participated in this can run is definitely in the Constitution.

4td3mq.gif
 
Last edited:
This is a black YouTube channel and states views from both sides of the isle:


Willie Brown had been separated from his wife for 12 years when Kamala Harris dated him. All the "hoe" allegations stem from her dating him.
Yes, she likely did benefit politically from it, but to question her moral compass otherwise over it is just another specious attack.
 
Conservatives are calling Kamala a slut, that's their main go to. I think they doth protest too much and are just horny losers
Yes, she likely did benefit politically from it, but to question her moral compass otherwise over it is just another specious attack.
He was 60, she was 20 something.... Likely ? LOL
 
Top