• Current Events & Politics
    Welcome Guest
    Please read before posting:
    Forum Guidelines Bluelight Rules
  • Current Events & Politics Moderators: deficiT | tryptakid | Foreigner

Was the Vaccine Designed to kill

oh? please elaborate... how do you know this, what evidence can you give?

i do care... my life, my kids' lives are on the line. please present good evidence for your very serious claims.
Anytime you ask people like this for evidence to back up what they're saying they rarely have it and the little bit they do have will leave you with more questions that they don't have an answer for because there isn't one because it's yet another silly conspiracy theory.
 
Excess deaths are still running high. Not just in the UK but everywhere else too.

British Medical Journal
Cobus Daneel, chair of the CMI Mortality Projections Committee, said, “The third quarter of 2023 saw continuing excess mortality for the sixth quarter in a row but at a lower level than the previous five quarters.”

Veena Raleigh, a senior fellow at the health think tank the King’s Fund, told The BMJ that there had been large numbers of deaths related to flu and covid-19 in December 2022 and January this year, which was influencing the figures.5The 2023 figures to date do not compare well with 2019. Mortality to date is about 5.5% higher than it was for the same period in 2019,” she said.

With 2023 to date, we haven’t had the bounce back that we might have expected once the worst of the pandemic was over. In the first three quarters of 2023 the mortality rate was higher than in many years in the pre-pandemic decade. If we have a good coming winter things could get back to 2019 levels relatively quickly, but it’s unpredictable.

EuroMOMO Bulletin, Week 4, 2024
EuroMOMO Graphs
This week’s pooled EuroMOMO estimates of all-cause mortality for the participating European countries show substantial elevated level of mortality, overall and in the age groups above 45 years of age.
 
Since this so called vaccine came out for the public I've had 4 friends die all within about 2 years from taking the jab. As of 2024 another friend just died in the hospital 2 days ago. Another one is in the hospital now. They both were in the military. One Army and one Navy. They both said they were following orders like when they served in the Military. I did try to warn them and the others that were lost. Take a look at this:
Why would these tech companies monitor the vaccinated and how would they do this? Bluetooth MAC addresses, nano routers and 5G tech IoT's?
Here is more proof from Bill Gates:
 
Pharmacovigilance is also referred to as 'Stage V trials' i.e. even when a new medicine receives an ML, the maker has to continue to monitor their new medicine and to to monitor an equivalent group that didn't/don't receive the new medicine.

So someone using Pharmacovigilance as if it's a scary word evidently doesn't even know that ALL new medicines under exactly the same monitoring. I think the most famous example was the introduction of the COX2 inhibitors. Selective NSAIDs that didn't cause the stomach issues of traditional, non-selective inhibitors. It took several years but it was possible to show that the use of some of the COX2 inhibitors were associated with in increased likelihood of a 'cardiac events' compared to the trial group and around half the COX2 inhibitors were voluntary removed from the market by their makers. And not causal link was ever shown - but with a large enough sample site, a statistical increase suggesting a correlation was considered sufficient reason. That is a VERY conservative way to proceed considering that the development costs would never have been covered.

But that's an example of pharmacovigilance detecting a problem - in an overwhelming percentage of cases, no such issues were noted - but 'new drug found to be safe; doesn't make for a news story, I think you will agree. I think it's MORE reassuring that even when a new drug receives an ML, it's still continually being assessed for the entire time it's on the market. In the UK the BNF even contains 'yellow cards' so every GP can, at no cost, report a negative outcome. Most are idiopathic BUT if a lot of yellow cards describe the same outcome with the same medicine, it's yet another way to ensure unsafe medicines are rooted out. A LOT of effort goes into this.

But suggesting it ONLY applied to the COVID vaccine is plainly untrue. It's how the drug-discovery pipeline has worked for decades. EVERY medicine is subject to pharmacovigilance. 55 new medicines were approved in 2023, 37 in 2022, 50 in 2020 and so on and they will ALL undergo continuous pharmacovigilance.

I'm not saying the system is perfect - but it's not as if a vaccines receives more or less scrutiny by pharmacoepidemiologists.

 
Last edited:
i have said it before - the "vaccine is population control from the man" argument falls at the first hurdle.

so i'll ask it again, if the govt. wanted to cull the population, how does killing off a bunch of unthinking sheep and leaving behind a bunch of noble, anti-vax, anti-government types benefit the government?

alasdair
 
i have said it before - the "vaccine is population control from the man" argument falls at the first hurdle.

so i'll ask it again, if the govt. wanted to cull the population, how does killing off a bunch of unthinking sheep and leaving behind a bunch of noble, anti-vax, anti-government types benefit the government?

alasdair

It could be argued that the people so avowedly against vaccinations are the one's removing themselves from the gene-pool. Maybe that IS the plan?
 
I am old enough to have seen the destruction polio brought - the crippled survivors. My parents have lived in the age before and after the introduction of antibiotics and one of my grandmothers worked in an isolation hospital an so really got to see how many terrible diseases have disappeared because of inoculation, antibacterial and antiviral medicines.

It's like an entire century of medical progress is conveniently forgotten. My great aunt worked in an isolation hospital. Palliative care before the term 'palliative' was really used much. But hundreds and possibly thousands of people who died from diseases medicine has overcome so completely, most people aren't even aware of the death-toll surrounding such diseases... but every town having at LEAST one isolation hospital should be a clue.
 
It could be argued that the people so avowedly against vaccinations are the one's removing themselves from the gene-pool. Maybe that IS the plan?

maybe.

but those same people (who are anti covid vax) tend to also downplay the seriousness of the virus in the first place so there is a disconnect there.

i'm completely open the idea that the vaccine may be part of a grand world depopulation plan but can anybody tell me why it targets the population it clearly targets because, to me, that makes no sense?

alasdair
 
I am old enough to have seen the destruction polio brought - the crippled survivors. My parents have lived in the age before and after the introduction of antibiotics and one of my grandmothers worked in an isolation hospital an so really got to see how many terrible diseases have disappeared because of inoculation, antibacterial and antiviral medicines.
Polio is a state sanctioned coverup, similar to BSE (mad cow disease), in order to protect the financial interests and shareholders of industrial chemical industries from litigation. Environmental chemical poisoning. Both are quite easy to ascertain the truth of in fact; Polio was primarily DDT poisoning, and up until fairly recently the last three countries which had 'wild Polio' just coincidentally happened to still be using DDT for agriculture and malaria control: Nigeria, Afghanistan, Pakistan.

The virus concept, whether accidentally or deliberately, has found its way to being the scapegoat of choice to misdirect public attention away from damaging environmental factors that cause illness - if people realized the pandemics and epidemics of the 17th and 18th centuries were caused primarily by: no sanitation, rotten food, polluted water, cramped chicken coop like living conditions, stress (overwork), etc.. what do you think the publics reaction would be to our living arrangements now? Might they demand the establishment spend more on us, re-design our urban environments to suit human needs rather than economic interests, etc?
 
Polio is a state sanctioned coverup, similar to BSE (mad cow disease), in order to protect the financial interests and shareholders of industrial chemical industries from litigation. Environmental chemical poisoning. Both are quite easy to ascertain the truth of in fact; Polio was primarily DDT poisoning, and up until fairly recently the last three countries which had 'wild Polio' just coincidentally happened to still be using DDT for agriculture and malaria control: Nigeria, Afghanistan, Pakistan.

The virus concept, whether accidentally or deliberately, has found its way to being the scapegoat of choice to misdirect public attention away from damaging environmental factors that cause illness - if people realized the pandemics and epidemics of the 17th and 18th centuries were caused primarily by: no sanitation, rotten food, polluted water, cramped chicken coop like living conditions, stress (overwork), etc.. what do you think the publics reaction would be to our living arrangements now? Might they demand the establishment spend more on us, re-design our urban environments to suit human needs rather than economic interests, etc?

Hitchen's Razor - that which is asserted without evidence may be dismissed without evidence.
 
i have said it before - the "vaccine is population control from the man" argument falls at the first hurdle.

so i'll ask it again, if the govt. wanted to cull the population, how does killing off a bunch of unthinking sheep and leaving behind a bunch of noble, anti-vax, anti-government types benefit the government?

alasdair
You'd have to ask them that question. We would only be speculating which gives room for error. But I did put up Bill Gates Ted Talks about this and his view. You seen it like most have.
The real question is who gotz the jab and who don't ? I don't.
 
maybe.

but those same people (who are anti covid vax) tend to also downplay the seriousness of the virus in the first place so there is a disconnect there.

i'm completely open the idea that the vaccine may be part of a grand world depopulation plan but can anybody tell me why it targets the population it clearly targets because, to me, that makes no sense?

alasdair
I believe the "cv-19 virus" was 5G microwave illness. Wuhan was the first "smart city" and went online using millimeter waves and other frequencies that humans have not been exposed to except during gov't testing. Here is over 4000 gov't documents on the bio effects of these frequencies:
https://zoryglaser.com/
After checking out these documents you'll see the connection.
 
On Bluelight we tent to apply Hitchen's Razor, so I suggest the word you were searching for was 'no'.

There is some evidence that a handful of viruses are associated with increased risks of certain cancers. Hepatitis C is associated with non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. But so far it's treated as an association rather than a cause because it represents a risk factor rather than a causal relationship.
 
I believe the "cv-19 virus" was 5G microwave illness. Wuhan was the first "smart city" and went online using millimeter waves and other frequencies that humans have not been exposed to except during gov't testing.
Wuhan and the Lombardy region of Italy (second epicentre) share something in common, and it's not 5G.

Both areas are the most heavily (air) polluted in their respective regions (Lombardy/EU).

Lombardy, the most populated and industrialized Italian region, was the epicentre of the first wave (March and April 2020) of COVID-19 in Italy and it is among the most air polluted areas of Europe.

There was no virus. Just incidence of pneumonia in areas that are expected to see it and do see it frequently. The real difference between the two areas was that in China they utilized the iron fist control over communications and propaganda to whip up the myth, and in Italy they had to resort to what was conducted in other countries shortly after too (e.g. UK) in order to create the illusion; state sanctioned murder of care home residents and hospital patients via forced ventilation and putting those with respiratory illness on respiratory repressing drugs (midazolam, morphine, etc). They literally amended the guidance, coming from the top of the respective health services, to make this happen. Matt Hancock is even on record ordering double the usual amount of Midazolam.

5G is just David Icke being a total establishment shill, which he has always been. There are legitimate health risks with 5G technology, but it's not linked to covid. Thanks to him now both serious investigation into Covid and 5G are now associated with this fucktard. He's so obviously a shill, no one with his supposed knowledge would fuck things up like this.
 
Wuhan and the Lombardy region of Italy (second epicentre) share something in common, and it's not 5G.

Both areas are the most heavily (air) polluted in their respective regions (Lombardy/EU).


There was no virus. Just incidence of pneumonia in areas that are expected to see it and do see it frequently. The real difference between the two areas was that in China they utilized the iron fist control over communications and propaganda to whip up the myth, and in Italy they had to resort to what was conducted in other countries shortly after too (e.g. UK) in order to create the illusion; state sanctioned murder of care home residents and hospital patients via forced ventilation and putting those with respiratory illness on respiratory repressing drugs (midazolam, morphine, etc). They literally amended the guidance, coming from the top of the respective health services, to make this happen. Matt Hancock is even on record ordering double the usual amount of Midazolam.

5G is just David Icke being a total establishment shill, which he has always been. There are legitimate health risks with 5G technology, but it's not linked to covid. Thanks to him now both serious investigation into Covid and 5G are now associated with this fucktard. He's so obviously a shill, no one with his supposed knowledge would fuck things up like this.

The thing to remember is that people will parrot these lies and, key, will provide the person peddling the lies with a steady income.

In London (and I think in some Chinese cities) they resorted to misting - the idea being that one could spray a chemical into the atmosphere that would reduce the level of particulates:


It didn't work - or at least not the way London tried to do it.

Got to hand it to people like David Icke - they have proved that it's possible to make a living from making stuff up.
 
Wuhan and the Lombardy region of Italy (second epicentre) share something in common, and it's not 5G.

Both areas are the most heavily (air) polluted in their respective regions (Lombardy/EU).


There was no virus. Just incidence of pneumonia in areas that are expected to see it and do see it frequently. The real difference between the two areas was that in China they utilized the iron fist control over communications and propaganda to whip up the myth, and in Italy they had to resort to what was conducted in other countries shortly after too (e.g. UK) in order to create the illusion; state sanctioned murder of care home residents and hospital patients via forced ventilation and putting those with respiratory illness on respiratory repressing drugs (midazolam, morphine, etc). They literally amended the guidance, coming from the top of the respective health services, to make this happen. Matt Hancock is even on record ordering double the usual amount of Midazolam.

5G is just David Icke being a total establishment shill, which he has always been. There are legitimate health risks with 5G technology, but it's not linked to covid. Thanks to him now both serious investigation into Covid and 5G are now associated with this fucktard. He's so obviously a shill, no one with his supposed knowledge would fuck things up like this.
The air is bad all over and conductive due to the aluminum barium and strontium they have been spraying by chemtrails. You can go outside any night with a high powered flashlight and shine it up to the sky, you'll see the particles shining in the air. There are patents on this since the 1900s.
 
The air is bad all over
When it comes to verifiable air pollution, there are geographical locations that suffer from abnormally high air pollution due to wind flows and geography. Lombardy and Wuhan are legitimate examples of this.
You can go outside any night with a high powered flashlight and shine it up to the sky, you'll see the particles shining in the air.
You have stumbled too far into self reinforcing paranoia. Given this thread is not about chemtrails, all I will say is this; chemtrails are misdirection and obfuscation to hide how they are actually implementing global weather pattern modification. Cloud seeding is for local weather modification, and really only useful for creating clouds. That's all. Actually manipulating weather patterns involves the use of microwave band energy, creating regions of interference that can cause cloud formation and direct wind flow patterns.
 
Top