Science Debunking Flat Earth Theory: Why the Earth is Undoubtedly Spherical

[AutoTripper]

the organisation is called nasa, not nasha.

would you also conclude that the entire town of nashua, nh can't be trusted? it's one letter away too.

alasdair

So they played on the words.

Nashua isn't an apt substitute at all IMO just here.

But hey, I say I am not on any mission to prove this single point, idea.

I am past futility re the general grander picture, the irreversible diversity between v mainstream govt trusting and not

It's a waste on all parts. I aim to see past division.

But irt my true actual personal life and real firm solid experience I can naturally only share still, else I'm an avatar needs to shush myself.


And every matter of any impact, importance pertains to so much as well, so things can roam there.


Lol, he accused me of spreading false information on the internet


Again we need to be real BL. Was a simple expression. Not baseless either in my view and not my origin too.


Barely influencing the world. Nor a summons to prove again. Proving anything is b hard too, right true or wrong. Reason we have "courts" lol. BL isn't one iirc.

After all too was just one mute point.


I'm not betting my head on that.



Regardless @alasdairm nothing here in any retortful sense mate, only responding and expressing I guess, I value closure even if something will never finish say.

And I hope you are keeping good man really.


Not seen bird in ages now hope he's alright.

He saw you always as such a solid friend to him as well you know I know this.

 

[alasdairm]

So they played on the words.

right. because it doesn't work straight up

Nashua isn't an apt substitute at all IMO

nasha and nasa are different by just one letter.

nasha and nashua are different by just one letter.

you accept the one which supports your theory and reject the one which doesn't. this is called confirmation bias.

anyhoo, all the best amigo. i hope you are well.

alasdair

 

[AutoTripper]

right. because it doesn't work straight up



nasha and nasa are different by just one letter.

nasha and nashua are different by just one letter.

you accept the one which supports your theory and reject the one which doesn't. this is called confirmation bias.

anyhoo, all the best amigo. i hope you are well.

alasdair

I accept, that lol. I'd also argue it works each way.

I have honestly no wish need want or desire, nor see any gain in any of my true views, decisions, regards speculations theories etc.

I have no interest in life or reality or our world slightly even now.

I'm living surviving leaning about myself becoming more independent while most impossible enduring long running proactive battle to heal and escape 2021 injury ghost upon me still.

I'm truly not at all "interested" in my Nano stuff, any bit.

It's simply my reality though and I know what I have seen observed experienced and recorded as lucidly and recollectable as can virtually be.


I could say, have a whole thread anywhere better cam, more time commitment etc to persuasion of the actual insane nonsensical, but totally real scale of it all.

I mean I can't even pick a line on this to type to anyone, now.

Sit with me and a coffee any time, be an intelligent person open before dismissal

SEE the evidence oneself. Cannot fail unless very visually impaired ofc.


I am sure it is something which does have to be seen first hand to ever matter though.


Still, I know too much about it to scrap into line futiley no disrespect to anyone honest.

But I can so easily show, describe to an open observant person.


I'd way way rather be doing other things.

But that isn't what this is about. Again impossible to begin to detail enough here.

And yes I have decided in no way do I trust NASA, never will.

We can all have a view right? Doesn't always need to be a case of proof and dangerous misinfo. I still stick to what I actually know anyway.

The things nobody can attempt to feasibly deny in my mind sensibly or in match with my own perception.


Basic immediate reality stuff expanding out.


I cannot say I "know" anything of NASA.


I know a lot about allergies, managing them, cooing with all sorts infections quite a lot about food diet supplements and herb


A lot about sport too.

Tennis, Soccer lol, Rugby Snooker Athletics god anything, less golf though I still remember Nick Faldo, before Tiger's era I think what mid 90's?


And so on.

 

[Vastness]

Since this thread was created I've decided the Earth is neither flat nor spherical but actually a 2 dimensional icosahedron inside an icosagon, the 2 dimensions are important, as is the number of faces on the inner polygon, because 2 is the same number of hands I have and that most people are born with, and the number of sides is 2 with a zero after it, and zero is roughly what I know about NASA's hiring process, effectively. Coincidence? I think not. Open to civil discussions over a coffee. Oh yes also there is no zero in Roman numerals, but Roman civilization happened on Earth. Just saying what I know.

 

[snmfmy]

I think a thread discussing the scientific reasons why we actually need a thread to debunk idiots that believe the earth is flat would be more appropriate than a thread debunking the theory that the earth is flat.

 

[snmfmy]

Hi. I'm open and aim to keep grounded, original too so I will say...

I consider Antarctica is a scam, it's an ice wall encircling our Continents or "Known Lands" with a particular large high mountainous region, outside the ice walls heavily guarded militarily are all permiters too, are more vast seas, more lands, we are kept in dark of.

Our Earth we know of is this section.


The Bible is the greatest equivocation ever IMO but truth between lines.

Does state Earth is flat under a dome.

NASA translated into Hebrew means "to deceive"

NASA confess they have to photoshop their images of round Earth get this..

Because they can't get far enough away to take a photo.

The images show the photoshopping too.

Buzz & co swearing never actually went to the moon.


And look at Antarctica "Mass" on Google Earth see the shape transition.


This again isn't my forte though, I am not well had severest most stressful year(s(s)) and I can't deal with overloads of speculation.


But Antractica is interesting though. Flights are more cunningly completely orchestrated coordinated controlled etc, Air space being most tightly regulated of all, the Illusion of this relatively miniature prison space as the only place, round floating spinning no other where to reach, is maintained through many genius mechanisms.


Lots people really into this topic, until I get there myself it's not relevant enough yet.

You don't actually believe Antarctica is an ice wall encircling the planet do you?

 

[snmfmy]

Since this thread was created I've decided the Earth is neither flat nor spherical but actually a 2 dimensional icosahedron inside an icosagon, the 2 dimensions are important, as is the number of faces on the inner polygon, because 2 is the same number of hands I have and that most people are born with, and the number of sides is 2 with a zero after it, and zero is roughly what I know about NASA's hiring process, effectively. Coincidence? I think not. Open to civil discussions over a coffee. Oh yes also there is no zero in Roman numerals, but Roman civilization happened on Earth. Just saying what I know.

So when you say it's on paper it actually is on paper cuz it's two dimensional.

 

[snmfmy]

The solar system needed a frisbee... and we're it.

So you're saying that gravity on Earth behaves completely differently than gravity anywhere else because it would have to if our planet was was shaped like a weird platter torch kind of thing.

 

[snmfmy]

I was thinking about those pluto images the other day. I got a bigger telescope and could see brown lines on Jupiter and some moons and it made me think about how I can see a clearer image of Jupiter from my yard than NASA could see of Pluto 20 years ago

Well that would be because Pluto is 10 times farther away from Earth than Jupiter.

It has a diameter 1/36th that of Jupiter.

That means it's apparently 1296 times smaller than Jupiter, and it has 129,600 times less incident light because It is 10 times further away than the sun.

You can calculate that by the difference in presented area which is 1/1296 multiplied by the difference in incident light.

So we have an object that is five orders of magnitude dimmer and three orders of magnitude smaller That's why.

I hope you liked my technical description.

 

[snmfmy]

The moon is flat. There's a filter on the sky that creates an optical illusion by making the moon appear to be a spherical celestial body.

Are you just randomly watching flat Earthers on YouTube and then reposting some of their ridiculous arguments.

 

[snmfmy]

because you don't care about the fact that you're spreading complete falsehoods, apparently

If you watched flat earthers on YouTube, you would know that you cannot argue with these people.

Part of me believes that autotripper is just having us all on.

 

[AutoTripper]

You don't actually believe Antarctica is an ice wall encircling the planet do you?

Believe might not be apt, here.

I confess to a v v how put it, Unique by definition is probably rightly fitting, belief system.

But not as willy nilly fleeting baseless as surely seems.

I consider possibilities even degrees of probability until dumbfounded penned in however we look at reality controlled weak damaged regular mortal actually know something, I'm simply open just for enough reasons simply cannot trust our f mainstream.


I

 

[snmfmy]

Believe might not be apt, here.

I confess to a v v how put it, Unique by definition is probably rightly fitting, belief system.

But not as willy nilly fleeting baseless as surely seems.

I consider possibilities even degrees of probability until dumbfounded penned in however we look at reality controlled weak damaged regular mortal actually know something, I'm simply open just for enough reasons simply cannot trust our f mainstream.


I

You do know that multiple countries other than the United States have sent spacecraft to orbit the moon and they have actually seen the left behind lunar lander parts and other basically garbage that US astronauts left there. They have also flown around the moon and taking a video of it so you can see that it is not flat.

If the moon isn't flat, why should the earth be flat?

And you know there's no ice wall in Antarctica. People have actually trekked all the way across Antarctica from one side to the other. It's remarkably flat because the snow and ice have piled up.

 

[AutoTripper]

If you watched flat earthers on YouTube, you would know that you cannot argue with these people.

Part of me believes that autotripper is just having us all on.

No. I am never having anybody on mate, I'll make sure it's fully transparent if so never left hanging good humour only


But see that f genius Belgian man's presentations, not on flat ea... but much wider perspective in pretty laymen tbf too. Interesting stuff.


And my Nano/Artificial Intelligence/Morgellons talk, videos, line!

Again zero foolery I Promise!

 

[AutoTripper]

You do know that multiple countries other than the United States have sent spacecraft to orbit the moon and they have actually seen the left behind lunar lander parts and other basically garbage that US astronauts left there. They have also flown around the moon and taking a video of it so you can see that it is not flat.

If the moon isn't flat, why should the earth be flat?

And you know there's no ice wall in Antarctica. People have actually trekked all the way across Antarctica from one side to the other. It's remarkably flat because the snow and ice have piled up.

They all lie. Only the governments have allegedly been to space.

Seriously find godgevlamste. Just see what he presents.

 

[snmfmy]

They all lie. Only the governments have allegedly been to space.

Seriously find godgevlamste. Just see what he presents.

No, there's actually been a person who went high enough to be considered in space. Felix baumgartner.

There's other ways to determine if the earth is flat or not. And it's so funny because a bunch of flat earthers decided to get a laser and set it up level and then drive like 20 miles away and see if it hit their target and it didn't because the earth isn't flat. It was exactly at the position. It should have been if the earth was round.

It's also why ships disappear slowly over the horizon until you can just see the tips of their mast and then that's gone too.

It's also why if they build windmills in the ocean and they're farther away than a certain distance you can't see them from Shore.

 

[snmfmy]

They all lie. Only the governments have allegedly been to space.

Seriously find godgevlamste. Just see what he presents.

Oh, he's the fourth phase of water guy which doesn't exist.

There's no such thing as a structured hexagonal molecule of water.

There are such things as water clusters that form many different geometric shapes, but they last less than 200 femtoseconds.

This guy is not credulous and there is no peer-reviewed science backing his " scientific papers"

 

[RareForm]

So you're saying that gravity on Earth behaves completely differently than gravity anywhere else because it would have to if our planet was was shaped like a weird platter torch kind of thing.

Are you just randomly watching flat Earthers on YouTube and then reposting some of their ridiculous arguments.

They were jokingly sardonic posts.

 

[snmfmy]

They were jokingly sardonic posts.

I thought you would get so were my responses.

Considering that you started the thread, I realized that you didn't believe it.

Although robotripper is another story.

 

[RareForm]

I see. I didn't start the thread, though. And there's no need to antagonize AutoTripper. That's against the rules of this subforum.