You claim that you posted two articles and an image before you posted thiswhat are you talking about?
....
Iran funds Hezbollah. Why would they not fund Hamas?
...
no proof of what? That Hamas is funded by Iran?
Iranian FM, Hamas leader Haniyeh agree to 'continue cooperation'
Iranian Foreign Minister Hossein Amirabdollahian meets with Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh in Qatar. October 15, 2023
SUPPORT FROM IRAN
![]()
Who's funding Hamas?
Hamas gets its funding for militant operations from taxing imports into Gaza, creating phony charities, and real estate investments.www.businessinsider.com
You claim that you posted two articles and an image before you posted this
One article states that "Iran will continue to cooperate with Hamas" with no mention of funding and the other states that
"Any business. Any aid, humanitarian aid, the truck after truck after truck that would come in on a daily basis from Israel into Gaza could all be taxed and extorted — so the largest pot of income for Hamas recently has not been Iran
Directly after the sections you quoted about some spook speculating that Iran funds Hamas.
The image you posted is that of an Iranian Foreign Minister meeting with a Hamas leader. USA meets with Russia and China and I wouldn't say that we fund either. (Although we do conduct business transactions and import/export from each).
Tbf I missed the part of your post you quoted regarding the spook speculating that Iran funds Hamas before you said "Iran funds hezbollah why wouldn't they fund Hamas?"
Which just seemed like you were making the jump. I guess I missed the context. That's all I was talking about.
As far as the intelligence agencies go - I'm no expert by any means - it just seems like they have incentive to push their narrative and I can't claim to understand all of the intricacies that go into what they decide to make public knowledge. I'm sure there is some truth to it.Right, yeah I could've also said,
"Iran funds Hezbollah, so ideologically and politically, it would make sense that they also fund Hamas".
or
"Iran funds Hezbollah, so let's not pretend as though they would have a moral objection to also funding Hamas".
You guys can try to discredit our intelligence agencies if you want. But you know if something makes inherent sense to me and my own intuition, then I find multiple credible sources backing that up, I'm going to take that as fact until I'm presented with better evidence.
i have to get ready for some shit, i want to respond to the rest of your post.... but i'll just for now ask youpeople aren't supporting them but when I keep hearing that all of this is Israel's fault and that they caused this, I'm hearing justification.
I'm sure whatever god they're praying to wouldn't want us killing each other in their name.
What happened after the Battle of Waterloo, 1815. Go.Eh I'm open to conspiracy theories, but he got some pretty basic parts of the timeline wrong...
He said America entered WW2 after the Rothschilds bought Israel from Great Britain.
The Rothschilds were involved in Zionism early on. They began buying land in the Levant in the late 1800s. Long, long before WW2. He could have also been thinking of the Belfour Declaration, but that was WW1 not WW2.
As for any of it being the US' motivation to enter WW2, eh. Our reasons for entering that war are pretty established, I don't think Zionism had anything to do with the US entering WW2. Or if it was a factor it certainly wasn't the main factor.
You're shifting the goalposts here. If someone breaks into your house because you've got a shitty old lock on your front door, that person is still criminally responsible. They dont get a reduced sentence because you didnt maintain your property.i have to get ready for some shit, i want to respond to the rest of your post.... but i'll just for now ask you
are the israeli jewish citizens justifying hamas' brutal attack by blaming the israeli government?
almost the whole country of israel blames netanyahu and the defense minister for their fuckups... their policies of enabling and protecting the settlers in the west bank (and i'm happy to see you also hate the shit in the west bank, makes me proud)
and specifically pulling troops from the most (or one of the most) fortified border in the world to go protect said settlers.
What happened after the Battle of Waterloo, 1815. Go.
Ya don't know.
I think that one was in MexicoI sure don't.
What was it?
operative words.btw
"in 1977, Protocol I was adopted as an amendment to the Geneva Conventions, prohibiting the deliberate or indiscriminate attack of civilians and civilian objects in the war-zone and the attacking force must take precautions and steps to spare the lives of civilians and civilian objects as possible"
You should really read up on this stuff.
My current thinking is there are two options.so you're in favor of a full on ground invasion then ?
they are not carpet bombing "the entirety of gaza".So bombing the entirety of Gaza is a targeted strike? Interesting
Is it a targeted strike when they bomb the safe passage area to Egypt?