I'm not a pedo supporter.
neither am i. and if you're gonna respond, i'd appreciate it if you didn't put the pedal to the metal on the baseless insults.
You are the one giving expiremental vaccines to kids
as a father, it is important to be informed and do the smart thing to keep them as healthy and safe as possible. and since the vaccine has not really harmed people ANYWHERE NEAR the magnitude of the virus... wait, isn't there a thread for this? o wait, you never have anything to say about it in good faith, so you just want to use it as a bludgeon because you mistakenly think of it as an insult.
i also put my kids in car seats, using seat belts.
and fanning for sexualizing them.
why can't you argue without these attacks? i don't think i remember
anybody here advocating for sexualizing kids. advocating for sex ed does not equal wanting sexualization, just like advocating for
drug education doesn't mean i advocate for creating junkies.
Trust me you have done more harm than I ever would.
i trust people who have done the research, your sophistry tells me you haven't done a shred of it. lack of education leads to worse outcomes. full stop.
Lots of us don't want to be called cis or queer, but @nepalnt21 and others don't respect that. Do you think that's okay?
cis is a neutral description, and it is informative in some situations. i have yet to see a convincing argument as to how it's a slur. i'm all ears.
"smooth" is also a descriptor, and if people suddenly decided it was a slur, i'd wanna know why.
and i never said anything about "queer"... why do you keep trying these dishonest tactics? i consider myself queer, so it is not scratched out of my vocab, but since it IS used as a slur and has widely been used a slur, i for sure will not call you that.
it makes zero sense to ban 'cis'.
Why would I bother substantiating anything to people who have proven time and time again to be so completely brain washed
oh the irony. the user least able to critically think is calling me brainwashed. how predictable.
you literally don’t understand
... which is why i'm asking. you're really into circular "logic". you NEVER substantiate. at this point, i am sure you're a troll.
I don't want any qualifications on that.
i don't think anyone here has even called you a cis man, at least outside of this debate (if it has happened at all).
but the idea that the word "cis"
is a slur is asinine.
i don't think anyone serious is talking about doing away with the word "man" and replacing it with "cis- man". some people use the term, and it has descriptive properties in certain contexts.
banning it and implying it is inherently a slur is ridiculous, and it is obvious to me that the people wanting to do away with the term "cis" (like elon) or are trying to paint it as inherently a slur are doing it from a place of transphobia, ie trying to erase the idea that there can be cis men and trans men.