• Current Events & Politics
    Welcome Guest
    Please read before posting:
    Forum Guidelines Bluelight Rules
  • Current Events & Politics Moderators: tryptakid | Foreigner

⫸Trans and LGBTQIA+ Discussion⫷

Status
Not open for further replies.
edika said:
Why does it matter to you that someone else doesn't like it? That's what I don't understand. You can't just let them be?
Click to expand...
the point is I guess that some people make it issue to others that they care+wtf you even care about them caring that some people care?
 
mal3volent said:
the title of your video is "we just want to get married"
Click to expand...
that's like just reading the headline and then not addressing the actual content of an article.
The title highlights the apparent verity of the slippery slope argument.
I think they should be able to get married.
Do you think they should be able to do the things in the video?
 
JGrimez said:
that's like just reading the headline and then not addressing the actual content of an article.
The title highlights the apparent verity of the slippery slope argument.
I think they should be able to get married.
Do you think they should be able to do the things in the video?
Click to expand...

you posted a video that is suggesting it was wrong to let us get married because it led to the stuff in the video. Usually you only posts videos you support/agree with.

I'm against drag shows for children, obviously. I've probably been more vocal about that than anyone here.
 
sunday.bird said:
A post-op trans man's "penis" is something.

It's something, but it isn't a penis.
Click to expand...
That's called a phalloplasty. And it's a surgical technique that was first developed for regular men who lost their penis to injury or cancer.

There's also a rare birth defect called penile / vaginal agenesis where the genitals fail to form in utero. An XX woman with vaginal agenesis would have to have a surgically constructed vagina if she wanted intercourse, and the end result would look LESS natural than vaginoplasty for a transsexual woman , because there's no genital tissue to work with.

I would still fuck a man or woman with genital reconstruction so long as that person had an attractive male / female body in all other aspects.

Would you reject an XY man who had to have a phalloplasty for whatever reason if he was otherwise hot?, and would you be similarly disparaging about his genitals? If not what would be the difference with a masculine-looking transsexual man, unless it's all about the 'correct' chromosomes?

I'm bisexual and male and I've seen one or two trans guys where I absolutely would NEVER have remotely guessed they were born technically female, and while female genitals on a man would totally put me off (same vice versa for women), if the guy in question had had a full phallo with a good surgeon I would have no issue.
 
JGrimez said:
Thanks for proving that there's a Jewish conspiracy by preventing a Jewish person from exposing a Jewish criminal mafia.
We can literally do that to any other group/race/religion. Examining their ideologies is not off-limits.
I shall never utter the name of your ruling tribe ever again.
Click to expand...
Calm down, mate. I just asked that people don't discuss this stuff on a relatively small drug forum. You can talk about this literally anywhere else. I think you're getting a bit hysterical tbh.
 
I remember when we just wanted to be accepted into society. Now we do shit like this.


Something tells me this wouldn't have been as celebrated if it had been depicting Muhammed and Islam.
 
mal3volent said:
you posted a video that is suggesting it was wrong to let us get married because it led to the stuff in the video. Usually you only posts videos you support/agree with.

I'm against drag shows for children, obviously. I've probably been more vocal about that than anyone here.
Click to expand...
The "community" which isn't really a community, needs to be aware of political operatives who are using the plight of the "community" in order to normalize sexualizing children.
If "you" stood up to this and said - no we're not cool with this, we just wanted to get married and experience equal rights - then some people wouldn't hold the entire community accountable for what's currently happening with children. Similar to what's happening with me holding the Jewish community to account:

swilow said:
Calm down, mate. I just asked that people don't discuss this stuff on a relatively small drug forum. You can talk about this literally anywhere else. I think you're getting a bit hysterical tbh.
Click to expand...
What does this being a "relatively small drug forum" have to do with anything? Why is this the only topic of discussion that should only be discussed "anywhere else"?
Again, this just proves what I'm saying: "To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize,"
Let me know when enough evidence comes out for it to no longer be a "conspiracy theory" and open for discussion.

nepalnt21 said:
^^^ they're mad you put your foot down about their dubious propaganda/ bigotry, go figure...
Click to expand...
Exposing an ethnic criminal mafia is bigotry?
Sorry, you must be one of the people who think that every Jewish person is an angel who never commits any crimes.
*cough*JeffreyEpsteinconspiracytheoryLOLOL*
 
JGrimez said:
What does this being a "relatively small drug forum" have to do with anything? Why is this the only topic of discussion that should only be discussed "anywhere else"?
Again, this just proves what I'm saying: "To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize,"
Let me know when enough evidence comes out for it to no longer be a "conspiracy theory" and open for discussion.
Click to expand...
Rattling on about the Jews on a drug forum isn't "exposing an ethnic mafia". Not wanting to host antisemitism doesn't mean that the Jews are somehow "ruling over" anyone. This situation doesn't have the hysterical gravity you're giving it.
 
nepalnt21 said:
you have yet to expose jack squat. citation needed, otherwise it's amorphous bigotry.
Click to expand...
any evidence you would dismiss as "dubious propaganda/bigotry" even if completely factual.
The definition of "antisemitism" has been altered and applied so liberally these days that any mere mention of someone's loyalty to this specific group is automatically shut down as some kind of taboo subject. It's actually quite fascinating to observe and it just shows the extent of this specific group's influence on society (which the people shutting down the discussions will deny ironically).

swilow said:
Rattling on about the Jews on a drug forum isn't "exposing an ethnic mafia". Not wanting to host antisemitism doesn't mean that the Jews are somehow "ruling over" anyone. This situation doesn't have the hysterical gravity you're giving it.
Click to expand...
Really you're the ones being hysterical by censoring it. Simply pointing out that people who established trans surgeries in the 1930's, and who are pushing gender ideology today, happen to be Jewish. You might not think it's relevant but you are also deciding that that information is not relevant for anyone else. That's one thing I would criticize Matt Walsh for in his documentary, 'What is a Woman?'. He goes into the history but only starts with American John Money who performed some horrendous transgender experiments on children. But why start there, why didn't he start with Magnus Hirschfeld in Weimar Germany? It's because Walsh works for The Daily Wire, which is run by Jewish Ben Shapiro. So they'd rather not tell the truth/whole story if there's any possibility that it portrays National Socialists as anything other than naughty and evil.

Anyway I completely understand why this factual information triggers people into cowering in fear (it's going to be criminal soon) so I'll refrain from noticing.
 
👆

tuck.jpg


Something to reduce your tucking irritation from the old Friar himself !
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top