• Current Events & Politics
    Welcome Guest
    Please read before posting:
    Forum Guidelines Bluelight Rules
  • Current Events & Politics Moderators: tryptakid | Foreigner

Jan 6 Attack on the Capitol and the aftermath

Look what the establishment has accomplished...

No real political debate happening here. People just attack the other side on a personal level, or a meta level of what they think the other side represents or the table they eat from.

Political discourse is dead.

The age of brainwashed flesh robots battling pseudo-real enemies on a fake computer generated battlefield while the 0.1% elites harness AI to take over the world.

You're all disgustingly distracted.
 
"pussy" as in "you're a pussy" is a noun, not an adjective.

an assault on democracy is one thing but let's not start an assault on the english language!

alasdair
The first response on google "A noun is a word that refers to a person, animal, thing, or idea, and an adjective describes a noun. For example, in the phrase 'a clever boy', 'clever' is an adjective, and 'boy' is a noun. In English, some adjectives can function as nouns. These are adjectival nouns." Nice try but I used it correctly, you're not quite the genius you think you are.
 
whysoserious? try to inject a little levity and...

you used it preceded by the indefinite article - "a pussy" - not once but twice. so it's a noun. not once but twice.

if you had said something like "you're a pussy bitch", well then it's functioning as an adjective. but you didn't. so it's not.

alasdair
 
its still an adjective the way I used it.
"it's" (as in, a contraction for "it is")

but i digress...

If someone is a pussy calling them a pussy is not an insult its an apt adjective.
literally a noun, you said "a pussy", clearly a noun. ffs, don't they have an english tutor in the kremlin?

i love that you are about to triple down on being completely and obviously wrong as fuck hahaha!!! this is amazing. who needs movies?
 
Look what the establishment has accomplished...

No real political debate happening here. People just attack the other side on a personal level, or a meta level of what they think the other side represents or the table they eat from.

Political discourse is dead.

The age of brainwashed flesh robots battling pseudo-real enemies on a fake computer generated battlefield while the 0.1% elites harness AI to take over the world.

You're all disgustingly distracted.
It’s bc most people are too stupid to see they are being played. And they take the establishments bait every time. I’ll admit the duplicity in the justice system can make me seethe, but I usually just try not to notice it or think about it.
 
When we had " the summer of love pt II" and the riots following the Floyd incident we had multiple occasions where an element of the crowd literally attacked Federal Buildings in their city, with on camera non "media coverage". This included attempts to block entrances/exits in conjunction with setting these entrances on fire. Was this explicit anti government actions labeled as attacks and the perpetrators detained and arrested? No.

This happened night after night in some locations but was explained away as mostly peaceful.
While we're on the subject of whataboutisms, what about the state legislator in Oregon who attempted to subvert democracy by unlocking the back door and allowing his supporters to raid their capitol building during session? Seems like a trend.

Also just wanted to point out that attacking federal buildings in random cities =/= attacking the US Capitol while Congress is in the process of certifying votes for the presidency. Setting a building on fire, while a crime and destructive, is =/= attempting to undermine the US Constitution. And trying to use said previous violence to somehow justify the attack on Jan 6 is a cop out IMHO.

If someone wanted to avenge the various lawbreaking that occurred in other cities, they could have done so on location like Rittenhouse did. This isn't a war. We aren't in 1776. All those people rioting, bludgeoning cops, and smearing shit on the walls of the US Capitol have been backpedaling and using the other unrest as some kind of sick excuse as to why Washington deserved to be attacked. And by the way, in doing so they are admitting that it was an attack and not some site-seeing tour nonsense.
What is wrong with the media that they don't cover such actions as violent anti-government attacks but do push the Jan 6 incident? It's almost as if they were choosing sides, but we all know that isn't possible in America, 'cause the Media sanctioned view is always the true one.
I don't have time, nor do I want to repeat, what ali already posted but he's right. Many of the news networks were more or less covering the other riots accurately. Fox News, Newsmax, and OAN were and still are calling the Jan 6 attack a peaceful gathering. How is that any different than calling the other civil unrest across the country peaceful? This is why I always say we should read news from all across the spectrum, not just in our own echo chambers. By doing so we can triangulate and see how each network covers the same events differently and then come to the objective conclusion that Fox is full of shit ;)
 
insurrections in oklahoma, montana and tennessee???

wow, you'd think these things were able to be found on google/ ddg search... maybe you have a link?

@Dropperneck

all i can find is demonstrations/ protests, nothing about any "insurrections"... unless there's a new definition i dunno about? is any public gathering called an "insurrection" now? just the ones the government doesn't like? or... what?
 
insurrections in oklahoma, montana and tennessee???

wow, you'd think these things were able to be found on google/ ddg search... maybe you have a link?

@Dropperneck

all i can find is demonstrations/ protests, nothing about any "insurrections"... unless there's a new definition i dunno about? is any public gathering called an "insurrection" now? just the ones the government doesn't like? or... what?
You can’t use google, the insurrectionists were doing the bidding of the establishment, so it’s going to be pretty well censored. It was an attack on Tennessee democracy.
 
hahaha lol whaaaat???!?! yeah, i said i used ddg (duckduckgo) and FOUND that exact event, but thought there was no way it was the "insurrection" you were talking about.

@Dropperneck

a 'violent uprising against a government'? yeah, hardly. they stopped their session because it was too loud or whatever, or there was unruly session procedure... lol, not because anyone was getting violent. the protestors even left when security pressed them.

unless you have some more evidence that points to violence? calls for the lawmakers' deaths? a single tossed fire extinguisher?
 
hahaha lol whaaaat???!?! yeah, i said i used ddg (duckduckgo) and FOUND that exact event, but thought there was no way it was the "insurrection" you were talking about.

@Dropperneck

a 'violent uprising against a government'? yeah, hardly. they stopped their session because it was too loud or whatever, or there was unruly session procedure... lol, not because anyone was getting violent. the protestors even left when security pressed them.

unless you have some more evidence that points to violence? calls for the lawmakers' deaths? a single tossed fire extinguisher?
It got violent in the crowd and they forcefully rushed the troopers. These people did worse than call for the deaths of Cameron sexton, the house speaker. The videos have been censored off of yt. They Spit on people, it was ugly all around. They used force to attack Tennessee democracy. Text book insurrection
 
Top