• Current Events & Politics
    Welcome Guest
    Please read before posting:
    Forum Guidelines Bluelight Rules
  • Current Events & Politics Moderators: tryptakid | Foreigner

The Dive's Covid Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
Mr. Krinkle said:
what happened? did you miss the first exit again?


and if you thought for yourself, you wouldn't be here arguing about what others think, would ya?
Click to expand...
I’m not sure who he is trying to convince , us or himself ? Like ok you thought for yourself crunched the numbers the data and made an informed decision, so what, as long as the info is correct he made the right decision
 
Las Veghost grower said:
I’m not sure who he is trying to convince , us or himself ? Like ok you thought for yourself crunched the numbers the data and made an informed decision, so what, as long as the info is correct he made the right decision
Click to expand...

i wonder if he even knows that he's in a conspiracy thread
 
@nepalnt21

There's no point. They've been doing this for two years. You're not going to change anyone's mind. Everybody else has given up. Just leave them to it.

For the record, pro-vaxxers aren't thinking for themselves and neither are anti-vaxxers. If you're young and healthy and you want to jab yourself, you're crazy. If you think this is a worldwide conspiracy, you're crazy. The truth is somewhere in the middle.
 
bird.is.the.word said:
If you think this is a worldwide conspiracy, you're crazy. The truth is somewhere in the middle.
Click to expand...
It's really not that unreasonable. The 'elite' have long expressed a desire to reduce the worlds population e.g. both Boris Johnson and his father have publicly expressed it. The anglo-american 'elite' are the ones who spawned the eugenics movement and actually began to implement it in the early 20th century e.g. California. They clearly have no qualms about taking life. I mean they did destroy several Arab nations on complete lies, and they did subjugate and continue to economically strangle the entire African continent.

Is it really such a stretch to imagine that, possibly even for a 'justifiable' reason (models predicting catastrophe due to resource use, climate change etc), they might actually feel they have to enact such a move? They're obviously not going to tell people they're doing it. A largely voluntary global vaccination push in an emergency is obviously the best way they could accomplish this as it affords them plausible deniability by stretching out the negative affects (cancers, heart disease, sterility) so that it blends in statistically speaking, and also gives them an 'out' by being able to claim it was 'unprecedented emergency' and an 'unfortunate industrial accident due to new, not so well tested biotechnology'.

I mean it could just be about profit making, but to write off the idea as crazy is itself crazy when history clearly shows just how psychopathic these people are and how little empathy they have for their subjects. They have already demonstrated who they are (know them by their fruits), so it's not beyond the realm of reasonable possibility they would actually do something like this. As horrifying as that possibility is, the 20th century is filled with horrors caused by horrible people. It is foolhardy to think we're beyond all that, unfortunately.

Personally, unfortunately I do believe there's something seriously wrong with these concoctions. The incessant drive to get everyone jabbed.. including children, for something that is demonstrably not that dangerous at all. All the censorship and propaganda is totally incongruent with an actual health emergency (you don't need to be reminded and forced to believe in a real one). It's all extremely suspect. They would not risk destroying the publics faith in a trillion dollar cash cow unless they had a motive beyond profit.
 
Why are people against these experimental vaccines still called “anti-vaxers” most are only against the COVID vax, not chicken pox measles mumps ect. Should we be called “anti-vax-that hasn’t been through full trialsers” ?
 
-=SS=- said:
Is it really such a stretch to imagine that, possibly even for a 'justifiable' reason (models predicting catastrophe due to resource use, climate change etc), they might actually feel they have to enact such a move?
Click to expand...

no it's not. but there's a difference between considering that, with a healthy level of skepticism, it's a possibility and stating with authority and superiority that's the only explanation for what's happening and anybody who disagrees is an ignorant sheep who can't possibly think for themselves.

-=SS=- said:
I mean it could just be about profit making
Click to expand...

and if something 'could be' then it also 'might not be'.

alasdair
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top