• Current Events & Politics
    Welcome Guest
    Please read before posting:
    Forum Guidelines Bluelight Rules
  • Current Events & Politics Moderators: deficiT | tryptakid | Foreigner

Covid-19 The New Covid Megathread v.Oh-my-cron!

I know two people who have died from covid 19 pzifer vaccine personally.

This is getting out of hand how many more people are going to die in this world. Im just one dude living in the butt fuck middle of nowhere on a shit hole island.

Are the NWO planning to wipe out kiwis if so sign me the fuck up ill praise the glory of the NWO cabal if they at least cull off all kiwis in the world as part of their diabolica plot.

As long as they kill me aswell cause fuck living anymore in this fucking communist state.
 
I know two people who have died from covid 19 pzifer vaccine personally.

This is getting out of hand how many more people are going to die in this world. Im just one dude living in the butt fuck middle of nowhere on a shit hole island.

Are the NWO planning to wipe out kiwis if so sign me the fuck up ill praise the glory of the NWO cabal if they at least cull off all kiwis in the world as part of their diabolica plot.

As long as they kill me aswell cause fuck living anymore in this fucking communist state.

is the average kiwi beginning to turn against Aunty Cindy yet
 

Government’s Bounty on Your Life: Hospitals’ Incentive Payments for COVID-19 are About $100K per COVID Patient​

Totatally legit webstie, bro. Totally legit...
 
FHpbSU5UcAAkCyQ
 
TripSitterNZ said:
i now know two people to have personally died from the vax due to heart attacks

No, you don't.

If the coroner in NZ concluded the cause of death to be the vaccines, he would have written that in his report.

So where are these deaths? Why aren't they in the paper?

I'm going to go ahead and assume that the coroner did not conclude they died from the vaccines.
 
Dr Peter McCullough pointed out that the current % of vaccine injuries/deaths is similar to the % of victims from covid.
care to share this data?

from here:


8.9 million doses of pfizer, less than 10k adverse events reported to VAERS (i.e. not even necessarily verified). 0.1% rate of adverse events, the vast majority of which are trivial and resolve quickly.

an order of magnitude lower than the lowest case-mortality rates quoted here, and this doesn't take into account any other problems caused by covid, of which there are many:



if the global medical authorities actually focused on prevention
that is what they are doing. and you are arguing against it.

edit to add- i am unsure about the JH mortality data, as 0.5% sticks in my head, but i couldn't find a source for that.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
It's amusing and also tragic that we can have a spate of young, healthy athletes dropping dead or having heart attacks - coincidentally right after a mass global vaccination campaign - and have so many people offering copes or acting like there's nothing bizarre about it.
It's fucking hilarious to me. This is a literal in your face contradiction to the narrative that anyone with an ounce of intelligence can recognize, and anyone with any degree of self-respect would perk up and say "Hang about, that's not normal. Wtf?".

People literally dropping dead and they'd rather come up with some ridiculous conspiracy theory about the weather or cannabis to explain it :ROFLMAO: Yeah bitches! Who's the fucking conspiracy theorist now! Delusional!
 
I think it's kind of hard to trust the data to make a reliable, logical, conclusion. When so much of it is being used to serve a purpose, either politically or financially. So all I can go off of is my personal experience and so far it's done me and my family well.

I get your point. I don’t trust cor
I don't get it. The concept of positionality - as derived from theories like standpoint theory - is not about undermining the scientific method or extirpating the notion of scientific objectivity or the value of quantitative data or analysis from research (if that's what you're implying, which is kinda how I read your comment). Rather, the intent is to enhance awareness of ('uncover') often hidden or obscured aspects of the dialectic that will always exist between researchers and their data sources, and which will inevitably frame the construction of 'knowledge' from that data. The idea being that through awareness of those relationships, we can collect better data and construct more useful and reliable theory and knowledge. It's an idea that naturally has more salience in some fields than others, but is still relevant almost everywhere.
Indeed. I agree with you and wrote the introduction and parts of the conclusion of my thesis in the first person because I thought it critical to make the reader aware of my prejudices as well as the data that ultimately altered them.

Mixed-methods research that incorporates the reflexivity of the researcher is (in my opinion) more powerful than purely ‘scientific’ quant research that pretends there cam be a perspective from nowhere.

When I made the previous post I was thinking of a growing body of scholarly publications that are almost 100 % reflexive stream of consciousness and in which the purported object of enquiry becomes secondary in importance.

Of course, it’s a trend. Not the reality in all research. And as this article shows, it is a thing that irritates a lot of people…

 
i tried to look for anything substantiating the OP and found nothing:


can anyone give me a list of the athletes that have been confirmed dead due to these vaccines and reliable sources regarding their causes of death? or are we being slightly over credulous, which is ironic given people like me are supposed to be the ones who lack critical thinking skills.

one of the athletes died from myocarditis due to covid before the vaccines were released. its disgusting his death is being used to further an anti vax agenda in this way.
 

Estimated 1 in 95 boys diagnosed with myocarditis in a California private school​

Gawd! I took 200 ug of acid 2 hours ago and still managed to see that the whole concept of VAERS under-reporting factor (URF) used by this author is deceitful. Given that nobody had ever heard of VAERS a couple of years ago, and that reports have skyrocketed since it has been publicised endlessly online by “vaccine-hesitant” people a data scientist would be much more concerned about the impact of a new over-reporting factor (ORF!).

Here is the link to raw data - check it out and see what the data says: https://vaers.hhs.gov/data.html

Plus, we’ve dealt with the value of anecdotes…
 
Do you people think I post shit for fun?

Here. If Israelis or Jews start dropping like flies in Israel I'd say that'd be proof positive of some of these theories because they're pushing the envelope (what better of more of a study could you want).

As promised yesterday in a previous post on this: here's additional details (you don't even have to read i.e. you just gotta listen):

"A hospital in Israel is holding the first major study into the use of a fourth dose of the Covid-19 vaccine. The clinical trial is being held at Sheba Medical Centre near Tel Aviv. Israel was one of the first countries to launch a booster programme. Also in the programme: the death of naturalist E O Wilson; and Poland’s President vetoes a controversial media bill. (Photo: A nurse prepares a fourth dose of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) vaccine as part of a trial in Israel."

Oh and a nice explanation re: the situation in South Africa (which seems to have become top of the pops since identifying Omicron) from one of our big wigs on the subject. Also information about possible new and future treatments for this fucking COVID shit.


 
Last edited:
Gawd! I took 200 ug of acid 2 hours ago and still managed to see that the whole concept of VAERS under-reporting factor (URF) used by this author is deceitful. Given that nobody had ever heard of VAERS a couple of years ago, and that reports have skyrocketed since it has been publicised endlessly online by “vaccine-hesitant” people a data scientist would be much more concerned about the impact of a new over-reporting factor (ORF!).

Here is the link to raw data - check it out and see what the data says: https://vaers.hhs.gov/data.html

Plus, we’ve dealt with the value of anecdotes…
Thanks for this. I actually took a look at the website. And I couldn't help but wonder if they're not responsible for all of this bullshit going around? Would it be too much trouble for them to analyze the data and present it on a page? I mean: we're relying on Joe Public to download raw data, pull it into Excel, and form an opinion. Simple you may say. Fuck me. Have you looked at some of the spelling and grammar around here? Not only that I'm only too familiar with Excel making mistakes, mainly due to column formatting, when importing raw .CSV (text) files. Can, and has, caused havoc even in simple formulae (like adding up a column of figures). Also seen it fuck up a data sort.
 
Last edited:
^nice to see some people think this is funny lol the denial

New York Times editor, 49, dies of heart attack one day after posting that he got his booster shot​

"Tejada, a former Wall Street Journal editor who went to work for the Times in 2016, had commemorated his third jab on Instagram: “Double-vaxxed. Janssen-fueled, Moderna-boosted. Hey, Omicron: Hit me with your wet snot.”

Yeah well. That's right up there with somebody saying "well what's the worst that can happen" or "what's next" or "what more can go wrong/happen". Believe me (and I speak from many years of bitter experience) those are phrases you DO NOT want to use if/when the shit hits the fan or something has gone sideways in life! :ROFLMAO:
 
When I made the previous post I was thinking of a growing body of scholarly publications that are almost 100 % reflexive stream of consciousness and in which the purported object of enquiry becomes secondary in importance.

Of course, it’s a trend. Not the reality in all research. And as this article shows, it is a thing that irritates a lot of people…

Narcissists gonna narcissist man... Like with most 'new' ideas, the pendulum will eventually find its groove. I can see the post-post-post-autoethnograpic moment on the horizon. Fingers crossed it doesn't involve Foucault :stoner:
 
Top