Increasingly close to getting in street brawls - I'm worried about my future

Status
Not open for further replies.
It's like this (I suspect this may be a long post).

Remember Ted Kaczynski? (una-bomber).
He was known for one thing or another, trying to regress technology etc., but did you know he was a cross dresser?

He felt he couldn't relate to women, and in fact contended that, to be able to relate to women as a man, one must become a woman (thus he cross dressed).

"Cognitive" application is basically self instruction, i.e. self dialogue, words we/I tell myself to influence how I think, thus how I behave.

The very first word I implemented 11 years ago, was the word "female".
i.e. become female, so you'll be able to relate to women better.
The idea was, personality wise, to become less of an imposing man bastard, be more docile and passive so women will be able to relate to and connect with you.

And, IT WORKED - I think I implemented the cue "female" for 6 months, and it worked.

But I realized having sex like that, whilst pleasant and intimate, I COULD NOT SATISFY THEM, could not make them orgasm.
The climax was weak as hell for me, and non-existent for them.

Thus the conundrum became a paradox - how to be "savage" enough to satisfy them in bed, whilst being sweet and approachable like a "female", such that they could connect with and relate to you.

The answer is all in "emotion".

Never be overtly physically imposing, but bring them into a position of highly internalized intimacy ("love"), and then when the application of violence happens for their sexual gratification, it happens only in that internalized zone.

Thus it precludes overt physical imposition, whilst still being able to apply the violence for their sexual pleasure.

To "bring them into" "love", we use the polar opposite of "love", and then emotionally guide them in....

i.e. make them crazy with "jealous", then apply "union", and then "love".

i.e. "jealous union, love....."

And the gratification itself once they're in that intimate zone, is "force".

Thus the complete cognitive application = "jealous union, love force".

So as to your question,



What you must understand is that, "jealous union, love...." = making someone crazy ("jealous"), then presenting with vulnerable/approachable states ("union/love"), before culminating with self assertion ("force").

The affect this has on sexual deviants = it's like a fucking lightening rod for them, it draws them like flies onto dog shit.

Women love it.
Sexual deviants get crazy (via "jealous" - which turns them on), then sense the subsequent vulnerability (via "union/love") and think, "jackpot".

It basically elicits their predatory nature - and they don't back off until they've pushed so far into my personal space (like mimicking the obscene act of masturbation on my face, as per this complaint), until they feel "force" - the assertive element, the violence.

i.e. they don't back off until they feel the potential for violence - and that only happens when they've already obscenely crossed the boundaries of my personal space.
To surmise this - it's like saying the cognitive application (resultant personality) encourages chicks to fuck with us, so we can fuck with them (i.e. it causes spontaneous hook ups).

But it's also a homing beacon for sexual deviants, and that's the part I'm concerned with.
 
And not all women need a violent dimension in their intimate lives to be sexually fulfilled.

Physiologically, nerves respond to strong action potentials.

This is what causes sexual gratification.

A strong action potential is a like a fractal or microcosm of internalized/intimate-violence (a strong force propagating inside the cell).

i.e. I respect your point of view, but physiologically as I see it organisms respond to that (i.e. neural pulse, internalized violence), by it's very physics, and anything less = no (genuine) response.

Though apparently many gals are world class fakers.
 
Last edited:
There's a difference between sexual deviancy and straight up violence.
There's a difference between internalized or intimate violence (the sexual kind that satisfies chicks in bed), and straight up (explicit) violence (which frightens chicks and scares them off).

Exactly.

And solving that conundrum, learning how to apply internalized violence is the base of the cognitive process to which I'm referring (i.e. optimized personality).
 
tenor.gif
 
No, but, seriously, if somebody sexually assaults you, take it to the police don't try and be a hero. For all you know the other person could have a weapon or could beat you senseless.
 
It's like this (I suspect this may be a long post).

Remember Ted Kaczynski? (una-bomber).
He was known for one thing or another, trying to regress technology etc., but did you know he was a cross dresser?

He felt he couldn't relate to women, and in fact contended that, to be able to relate to women as a man, one must become a woman (thus he cross dressed).

"Cognitive" application is basically self instruction, i.e. self dialogue, words we/I tell myself to influence how I think, thus how I behave.

The very first word I implemented 11 years ago, was the word "female".
i.e. become female, so you'll be able to relate to women better.
The idea was, personality wise, to become less of an imposing man bastard, be more docile and passive so women will be able to relate to and connect with you.

And, IT WORKED - I think I implemented the cue "female" for 6 months, and it worked.

But I realized having sex like that, whilst pleasant and intimate, I COULD NOT SATISFY THEM, could not make them orgasm.
The climax was weak as hell for me, and non-existent for them.

Thus the conundrum became a paradox - how to be "savage" enough to satisfy them in bed, whilst being sweet and approachable like a "female", such that they could connect with and relate to you.

The answer is all in "emotion".

Never be overtly physically imposing, but bring them into a position of highly internalized intimacy ("love"), and then when the application of violence happens for their sexual gratification, it happens only in that internalized zone.

Thus it precludes overt physical imposition, whilst still being able to apply the violence for their sexual pleasure.

To "bring them into" "love", we use the polar opposite of "love", and then emotionally guide them in....

i.e. make them crazy with "jealous", guide them into intimacy with "union", and the intimacy itself is "love".

i.e. "jealous union, love....."

And the gratification itself once they're in that intimate zone, is "force".

Thus the complete cognitive application = "jealous union, love force".

So as to your question,



What you must understand is that, "jealous union, love...." = making someone crazy ("jealous"), then presenting with vulnerable/approachable states ("union/love"), before culminating with self assertion ("force").

The affect this has on sexual deviants = it's like a fucking lightening rod for them, it draws them like flies onto dog shit.

Women love it.
Sexual deviants get crazy (via "jealous" - which turns them on), then sense the subsequent vulnerability (via "union/love") and think, "jackpot".

It basically elicits their predatory nature - and they don't back off until they've pushed so far into my personal space (like mimicking the obscene act of masturbation on my face, as per this complaint), until they feel "force" - the assertive element, the violence.

i.e. they don't back off until they feel the potential for violence - and that only happens when they've already obscenely crossed the boundaries of my personal space.

I think I understand...you wouldn't happen to have a diagram or schematic you could share to help illustrate this whole jealous union thing?
 
I think it would help a lot if I had a good way to release built up stress and emotions.
I say tentatively that, as of a couple hour ago, I may have found a way to implement this.

The cognitive state for optimal sexual attraction =

"Jealous union, love force".

Which causes high sexual tension etc.

To decompress from this application, I may simply be able to reverse the hemispheres,

"Love force, jealous union".

That makes little sense if not highly acquainted with the nature of the dynamic.

But - fingers crossed it may be essentially my get-out-of-jail-free card, or avoid-jail card......
 
This is a good point, and I'm in a unique kind of place currently; my long term hope is that I'll attain this and the problem of potentially psychotic emotional outbursts will become less of a problem.

At least that's my hope, but it's still quite theoretical.

Part of what I'm questioning about this process is, is being sexually attractive to women and being violent, does one basically come hand in hand with the other?

No.

While a lot of women do like a man that can hold his own in a fight (not all), that doesn’t equate to them liking violent men. I don’t take any shit, but I know how and when to use it.

I still don’t see how all these tangents come together too to be honest. Are you saying you exude such an aura of sexiness that gay men just lust after you?

And why does it feel like more and more of this incel ideology seem to be seeping into guys minds? You generalize women so much, and assume they all want to be dominated. Just had another poster say similar shit…

You starting to “think like a female” that’s called empathy, it’s called trying to understand other people, it should be extended to everyone not just females you want to fuck. Women are actually people, they aren’t this mysterious creature that needs figuring out.

-GC
 
I went out and about yesterday to get some shit done and FUCK!!

I thought almost everyone around me was going to lynch me.

"Jealous union, love force" - the personality this cognitive setup causes....

So I've inverted it, "love force, jealous union".

.....

Hopefully will render an improvement in personality and thus responses.
 
DRAMATIC improvement in responses with the modified cognitive setup.

So, this is what it was,

4wsQhSp.jpg


See how the curve dips = causes inward flow.

THIS, was what was causing the issue, being a presentation of vulnerability = the scumbags and dipshits are going to see/treat me as an easy target.

But of course it culminated in "force" = confrontation.

And this was causing much issue, potential brawls with creeped out sexual predators etc.

**
BUT, it's been modified via essentially reversing the poles:

0mgaq6s.png


So the curve and thus dynamic now runs outward = no inward vulnerability.

Now the flow is directed outward.

"Force" acting through "love" = gets right into their tender zone and fucks them.

Then followed by "jealous" for emotional ascension, to "union" for the intimacy to come together.

**
Point being, out and about today.

Huge improvement.
What a relief.

The scumbags just look at me now and then look away, where as before they were looking at me like I was Sunday roast.

Alls it means is no ugly avoidable confrontation for me, and of course the womenz are loving it.

Cause this cognitive setup reflects fucking them, where as being it was too weak and passive.
 
I was sat down, he pushed his groin area toward my face and began making a masturbating motion with this hand in my face.

If I hadn't shown him I was prepared to engage violently, it felt like he would have actually taken out his penis.

Then once he felt the violent potential, suddenly it was all one big joke and he was backing away.
You should have asked him to back off. If he didn't, you should've ripped his dick off.
People get away with acting like predatory creeps and overall idiots is because the rest of society live by the fallacy that "violence is always wrong".
Fuck that kumbaya-shit. The next time he might go after somebody who is not as assertive as you, and that might very well end in sexual assault.

As for the general problem with restraining oneself, picking up martial arts, like someone mentioned, will teach you discipline.
It will give you confidence and I can almost promise you that that confidence will make you calmer in situations like these.
If you don't fear getting into brawls and you know what you're capable of, the risk of getting into them are reduced significantly.
 
Alright so when I posted this thread initially, the cognitive cue setup was

- "jealous union, love force".

As it happens electricity flows from negative to positive, so I had to reverse the poles:

- "Love union, jealous force".

i.e. "Force" = the means by which we fuck.

We electrify it like a battery with
- negative node - "love".
- ion channel - "union".
- positive node - "jealous".

See this here,

5k8kD4s.jpg


It shows the flows of "holes" essentially - but negatively charged electrons actually flow the opposite direction.

I think that's largely where the confusion arose.

i.e. correct order = "love union, jealous force" = actually facilitates electrical flow.

**
Point being, socially now, things are MUCH more under control.

The jackals and fuckfaces seem to largely jog on, I attract much less attention.

BUT, there was this scumbag this evening whilst I was going to catch the train tried to shove me off the side walk and said something obscene.

Now, normally I may be "passive", "turn the other cheek to avoid violence".

Reflexively, as a result of this more accurately implemented cognitive setup, I immediately said "fuck you cocksucker" with a confrontational tone.

It's good because it shows that, when confrontation really goes out of its way of find you, this emotional setup allows me manage that without getting stepped on, and without the manifestation of violence (as no violence came about, I just seemed to cut the scumbag down, as they sheepishly minced off, lol).

.....

And even better there was this bunch of hotties looking on who clearly seemed impressed with my style and ability to manage what could have either been a very embarrassing or potentially violent and ugly scene, pretty much reflexively and effortlessly.
 
Last edited:
You sound like a manipulative narcissist who attaches a bunch of spiritual pseudo psychology terms to essentially just having different attitudes and approaches to people and situations. Whatever course you learnt this on ask for your money back

Don't know whether this entire thread is a faintly deranged humble brag, a closet homophobes confession or possibly a flog for some "program" you will at some point try to sell.

If someone invades your personal space respond appropriately, with necessary force IF necessary, without if not necessary. Report any sexual assaults to the police and stop blaming your aggression on the fact that you are some kind of sex god.

Stop thinking everyone in the street wants to screw you. Start treating both women and the gay community as a collection of individual people

Then your future should be fine
 
"The Dark Side" is definitely the appropriate forum for this thread.

See, this cue setup of emotional-words I had been applying, my thoughts initially were it should be used in attempt to influence others responses to me - which it seemed somewhat effective in doing.

However, what I'm beginning to think now is - it's used more specifically in terms of how I process my own emotions.

And the more effectively I do that = the more stable, happier and healthier a person I am.

And that = the attraction.

.....

So cues are, "jealous/union/love/force".

For optimal emotional stability, I basically want to get them to cancel each other out.

i.e. get "jealous" to neutralize "love" = "jealous love".

Get "union" to neutralize "force" = "union force".

= "jealous love, union force".

Neutralizing these emotions..... I have no idea the interpersonal feedback it will elicit.

I implemented it just now to stop myself doing loco, and thus far I feel significantly more stable.

.....

I guess that's where these breakthroughs and understandings of the counter intuitive happen through, right?

Right on the edge.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top