• Current Events & Politics
    Welcome Guest
    Please read before posting:
    Forum Guidelines Bluelight Rules
  • Current Events & Politics Moderators: deficiT | tryptakid | Foreigner

Memes Official Meme Discussion Thread

207352195_4588453977879591_3207357076653233444_n.jpg

Except that people calling for a ban on them are the same ones saying they're useless against the government. The reason for wanting them gone is to prevent people from shooting dozens of rounds into groups of people before anyone even has a chance to react (a problem not seen with less rapidly firing weapons).

The argument is that they won[t stop a government with tanks and nukes and other high tech heavy weaponry, but if they're gone they will prevent people from being so deadly when murdering other civilians.

Of course there are already so many, so the ship has probably sailed anyway.
 
I shouldn't have post that video of my bitche's ass-Biden, i didn't think a low person like @TheLoveBandit i wouldn't even matter to considering him/her as an ant, that s.he might be posting that type of propaganda, you're right (not politically, at least i hope) we gotta do something here
 
@TheLoveBandit that "gotcha" MLK meme is so dumb.. It's not judging someone by their skin rather than making a statement about a systemic issue. And by no means we lefties (yes MLK was a socialist, go cope and seethe y'all conservatives and libs who try to appropriate him!) say that every white person is privileged, of course there are poor or otherwise marginalized whites (think the LGBTQ community...), so it would be stupid to say every white person has per se some huge privilege. But on the other hand they do have a privilege POC don't have, it's just sometimes outweighed by other factors. White privilege doesn't count for much if your life is fucked in every other way. But implying it simply doesn't exist is just ignoring reality. Surely you don't do that, do you?

An regarding all those white slaver dudes in 1776, they also had about half of their life expectancy, so I fail to see how that relates in any way to how our society works now. People were wed and started having kids at age 12-14 not so long before that, too. Should we normalize that as well?
 
But implying it simply doesn't exist is just ignoring reality. Surely you don't do that, do you?

I don't believe it exists the way the left is presenting it these days. I can list a lot of examples, but we'll each retain our position anyways. I have a strong reaction when anyone makes a statement of another person based on race.

An regarding all those white slaver dudes in 1776, they also had about half of their life expectancy, so I fail to see how that relates in any way to how our society works now. People were wed and started having kids at age 12-14 not so long before that, too. Should we normalize that as well?

No, the meme is a meme. But along the lines your talking, I heard a clip from a podcast and went to hear more. It was a short bit from The Chad Prather Show (Ep 453 | Progressives Target Kids' Education). The guest, David Barton is a great historical mind who goes at lengths explaining not just the history being rewritten by progressives, and what's being omitted.

Some of the references were that the AP exams around 2014 had been written with no reference of the Founding Fathers, Lincoln, and even for WW2 there were no Japanese attacks (no Pearl Harbor) nor really any European theater (no mention of Hitler, nor the Holocaust) but only the one note of the US dropping the nuclear bomb and it raising question on America's priorities. This was around the 18m mark of a 45m podcast. At the 27m mark, he's going thru how we dropped 70million leaflets telling Japan which cities and targets we'd be (conventional) bombing leading up to the atomic bomb. He states there was no mention that Japanese beheaded more allied soldiers than the people we killed with two atomic bombs, nor the cannibalism they exercised.

35m mark gets to what caught me with the short blurb = the difference between 19th and 20th centuries. 1920's education changed from going up to the eight level where you diploma'd and went to college or work. School was only 3mo/yr. Barton says, today he brings in 18-25 yo folks (masters, PHD) and start them off by taking the 8th grade exit exam from back then. Even PHD kids can't get 50% on the exams of that day. America used to teach kids to think, since the 20's we have taught kids to memorize what they heard (introduced multiple choice and True-False). School went from 8grades to 12grades, 3mo to 9mo, and went to age based grades rather than the old 'levels' of knowledge and thinking ability. Now progressives are pushing 12mo/yr schooling, making 4y of college near mandatory as opposed to addressing the ability to THINK.

Prather went on a tangent about the citizenship test. Barton took that and shared that states started doin the 100 question citizenship (immigrants can learn it in 3mo, shows 92% pass rate). They tried it in a state and only 7% of the HS seniors could pass. A 3mo immigrant knows more about our country than a lifelong citizen coming out of our 12 grade educational system. 7 states now have it as part of HS graduation criteria. Other odd Barton facts - 62% of Americans can't name the 3 branches, 1 of 1000 can name the 5 rights of the First Amendment.

Closing (41m mark) they get into the Civil War, how "Little John" Clem through bravery on the battlefield was promoted to Sgt right then and there on the battlefield, but another General heard and came by and promoted him to Lt to join his staff. John was 12 - amazing by today's standards, not by what was expected of the youth back then.

Long way to come back to your point - shorter lifespans back then, people matured faster...or at least were expected-required to in order to survive. Now, we have much longer lifespans. I can't imagine we are now slower at maturing, but that is how our society is, unfortunately. I'm pretty sure I just ran in a big circular tangent (geometry joke, for those that care), and I'm not sure how close I came back to your point, but the eras were different, I agree.
 


Why?

Hey asshole people just want to watch the damn game without propaganda


Uh....you mean like players kneeling, or jerseys with BLM slogans? You mean like tv commercials during the breaks featuring multi-racial mixed families? Like gay pandering for pride month by sponsors of the game?
I agree.
 
Uh....you mean like players kneeling, or jerseys with BLM slogans? You mean like tv commercials during the breaks featuring multi-racial mixed families? Like gay pandering for pride month by sponsors of the game?
I agree.

aren't all those things you mentioned tied to social/human rights , not a specific political campaign? moreso a conspiracy theory than a campaign, at this point. I see what you're saying though.
 
aren't all those things you mentioned tied to social/human rights , not a specific political campaign? moreso a conspiracy theory than a campaign, at this point. I see what you're saying though.

Can be argued either way, IMO. Both have people who believe (right or wrong) that their cause is correct and they have facts to back them, that they wish to change how America operates in order to make it more fair and equal for all. There are someones offended at each message, doesn't mean one is right more than the other.
 
Uh....you mean like players kneeling, or jerseys with BLM slogans? You mean like tv commercials during the breaks featuring multi-racial mixed families? Like gay pandering for pride month by sponsors of the game?
I agree.
Exactly! I just want to watch the game! I hate how I can't do anything anymore without someone trying to influence me in some way (not specifically talking politics but just in general)

Although all those things are ultimately social issues and not political in their totality. But yeah.

When I see BLM propaganda I don't immediately think democrats
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I totally get it, but there's a difference IMO between a political agenda tied to a specific person and a civil rights movement tied to racial/social justice.
 
I mean, it's all protected free speech at the end of the day, so it's the same in that way. Informally though I think there's a difference.
 
He also said he wanted his kids to live in a world where people were judged by the content of their character.
The first time I ever heard Jeff Bezos talking was from an interview before his blastoff into space. For the richest man in the world they could have done better then the slightly sleazy next door neighbor from sitcoms. He isn't smart enough to lay down one coherent sentence but got where he is because of hard work, raw talent and imagination. And now he's boarding the rocket ship and pulling up the ladder behind him. What a perfect metaphor.


nd what's up with his face? It has a very strange rubbery quality as if a mask was pulled too tightly over something. His lips do impossible things, his smile is a scared grimace, and the voice emanates from a spot on his face but not his mouth. I think we're dealing with Epic Level trolling and I don't like it
 
Last edited:
The fuq you talkin about there mate? Don't be alarmed, I'm not taking any hostages and I don't think Tlb would pull a Putin.
I've wanted to post something about the Dubrovka hostage siege for a while, because I think it's fascinating. Certainly the first time, that we know of, where a fentanyl analog was weaponized. Only their need for secrecy led to dozens more senseless and unnecessary deaths because the responding paramedics didn't know what they were dealing with and didn't bring enough antagonist.
 
Top