• Current Events & Politics
    Welcome Guest
    Please read before posting:
    Forum Guidelines Bluelight Rules
  • Current Events & Politics Moderators: deficiT | tryptakid | Foreigner

Conspiracies The Covid Narrative

Status
Not open for further replies.
chinup said:
i dunno man, i kinda thought we did that when we invented antibiotics, semiconductor chips, and the internet. but then i think science is part of nature, using her to her best advantage so to speak.
Click to expand...

Yea antibiotics....and then you hand them out like candy and wonder where MRSA came from
 
Mr. Krinkle said:
Yea antibiotics....and then you hand them out like candy and wonder where MRSA came from
Click to expand...
there are research proposals for novel antibiotics but cos you only need them for 2 weeks pharmaceutical companies don't view them as a priority for development.


anyway lets just ignore the fact that we're no longer concerned about the bacterium that killed 1/3rd of europe and how that happened. that's just what i can come up with after over 6 hours of drinking.
 
chinup said:
anyway lets just ignore the fact that we're no longer concerned about the bacterium that killed 1/3rd of europe and how that happened. that's just what i can come up with after over 6 hours of drinking.
Click to expand...

oh ok...so we're just gonna ignore the fact that your science friends created this covid pandemic too and i should still just go ahead and trust them anyway because the research paper you read said everything's gonna be ok

ok
 
AutoTripper said:
But equally, maybe more so, and to a varying degree between us all, it really raises and sharpens awareness and cognition in various ways.
Click to expand...
Agreed, am fully aware of that...that it can do so anyway. From what I've observed however that scenario usually results from a somewhat sensible using schedule where this immense drug is respected.

Unfortunately those who (ab)use it with the incredible regularity and at huge doses like your good self...well, let's just say the exact opposite is, unfortunately, almost universally the case.

AutoTripper said:
Pure honest absolute truth is all that matters.
Click to expand...
Perhaps, it's a huge statement. I'll reflect back to you that 99% of your BL posts are absolute conjecture and are as far from what you deem ''all that matters' as it's possible to get.

You present as party to knowledge denied to almost all humanity, yet believe your ego is minimal. Have a ponder on it next time you trip and invite yourself out of denial brother. Also remember this is coming from someone likely wayyyy more anti-establishment than your good self who promotes psychedelics as medicine - go figure.

I know you're extremely well-intentioned but you're lost in your reactionary rebellion to the extent that you can't see the woods for the trees

I won't persue as could be deemed off-topic. It's healthy to question the validity of sources of information though I'm sure you'll agree. With love.
 
ageingpartyfiend said:
Agreed, am fully aware of that...that it can do so anyway. From what I've observed however that scenario usually results from a somewhat sensible using schedule where this immense drug is respected.

Unfortunately those who (ab)use it with the incredible regularity and at huge doses like your good self...well, let's just say the exact opposite is, unfortunately, almost universally the case.


Perhaps, it's a huge statement. I'll reflect back to you that 99% of your BL posts are absolute conjecture and are as far from what you deem ''all that matters' as it's possible to get.

You present as party to knowledge denied to almost all humanity, yet believe your ego is minimal. Have a ponder on it next time you trip and invite yourself out of denial brother. Also remember this is coming from someone likely wayyyy more anti-establishment than your good self who promotes psychedelics as medicine - go figure.

I know you're extremely well-intentioned but you're lost in your reactionary rebellion to the extent that you can't see the woods for the trees

I won't persue as could be deemed off-topic. It's healthy to question the validity of sources of information though I'm sure you'll agree. With love.
Click to expand...
I respect what you say. I still make the same argument. It’s not a given that even astronomical LSD intake nullifies validity of thinking, reasoning processes.

It can still work any way, at any dosage level, to the relative degree.

So I just genuinely feel it’s innacurate to assume I am most probably deluded and less conscious, aware because of my dosing schedule.

I admit, 17 mg’s from this February is extortionate.

But before that, by October was 18 mg’s over 13 months. Not too wild really, like steady 300 ug weekly.

I haven’t changed at all, before, during, I mean I have of course, what I aim for. Continual personal development.

All I speak now, is not rightly related to the 170 doses recent months. It was all scaffolded long ago, constantly reviewed and adapted admittedly.

I just mean, yes I have pushed a very powerful mind altering drug beyond usual advisable extent. It’s had profound impact.


But I’m still me, as I was before, actually better. Calmer, in person. Zero social anxiety. Ease of flowing communication like no time in my life, sharp cognition, word use etc.


I’m completely there still on all the basic daily goings on.

I never aspired for ego dissolution. I’m a mortal. Full of opinions and ego. It serves me. I didn’t see it as a dark shadow. I accept it as part of my mortal identity. I embrace my strengths and weaknesses.

One angle, if I’m shown outright wrong in time, on anything, I will have no shame, no embarrassment, sense of failiure, lack of face or any cowardice at all.

I’m very ego less in that respect. I would celebrate with you, and talk about all the things trust me I’d much prefer to.


I get your points, logic, but I feel it’s unfair to assert I am delusionally driven more by my ego than I am, that’s all, regardless of my correctness or wrongness.

I admit, I did myself little favour regarding credibility, months back, still I’m sure.

I’m sorry I never answered you back about you wisely calling out the whole Parker’s Alien spawn legitimacy.

I wanted to answer. But was bad patch, and it ain’t simple.

On that, yes, I agree, sources can be dubious and misleading. I’ve disconnected. My source is me. There is a thing you know, high intuition, visions, especially by dreams.

I have vivid little premonition dreams often of particular friends visiting, I awake to doorbell-it’s them. Everything they say, is a mirror of my short vivid dream as they neared the doorbell.

I live a very deep psychic life. I honestly dreamt visionarily, premonitiinally, twice I’d 2019 of the upcoming pandemic.

I can’t deny the whole conjecture label. I’m a visionary, a psychic, a prophet maybe even. Not a convincing politician, fact finding whizz kid.


Okay....I’m still me. I’m off my block yes, even 1.05 mg’s previous 7 days I realise I underestimate. I’m really looking to ease off now, but no regrets.

@ageingpartyfiend you are only well intentioned yourself I appreciate. We have very contrasting belief sytems. There are millions or least 000’s people think, feel, say identical to me too, NEVER dropped a Microgram likely. Had to add that which I believe.
 
ageingpartyfiend said:
well, let's just say the exact opposite is, unfortunately, almost universally the case.
Click to expand...
Just on that. Ido agree. I am aware. Losing my mind, not my goal. I just pushed it very hard only recently in impossible times.

It scares me those who did. Syd no 1. But on paper, logically, he musta been taking 600 ug minimum daily all 1967. Potentially mg’s daily, honestly.

Like 360 mg’s plus that year. My 17 mg’s recent has tested me, but really enhanced my respect for it and the need to stay below that line.
 
Last edited:
cduggles said:
Please get back on topic.
Click to expand...
Yep. Will do. Sorry. Just added above. No more. I didn’t feel it was entirely off topic, it was a case of my credibility and sanity questioned ultimately, relevant in such an important, heated topic, IMO.
 

EU Regulators Call on Pfizer, Moderna, AstraZeneca for More Data on Heart Inflammation, Guillain–Barré Syndrome​


The European Medicines Agency also wants Pfizer and Johnson & Johnson to update warnings and lists of side effects relating to face swelling (Pfizer) and blood clots (J&J).

EU regulators Friday called on Pfizer and Moderna to provide additional data related to the companies’ COVID vaccines and a potential link to heart inflammation, after the agency completed a safety review of all four COVID vaccines authorized for emergency use in the EU.


The European Medicines Agency’s safety committee, (PRAC), also asked AstraZeneca for data related to reports of Guillain–Barré syndrome in people who received the AstraZeneca vaccine, and they recommended Pfizer and Johnson & Johnson (J&J) update their labels with side effect warnings.


In a report issued May 7, PRAC disclosed its members were aware of cases of myocarditis and pericarditis following Pfizer vaccination. Regulators said they didn’t see an indication the vaccine caused these cases, but as a prevention, PRAC requested Pfizer provide further data, including an analysis of events according to age and gender in its next pandemic summary safety report and will consider if any other regulatory action is needed.


Because Moderna and Pfizer use the same mRNA technology for their vaccines, the committee asked Moderna to monitor for similar cases of heart inflammation.


Myocarditis, or inflammation of the heart muscle, can lead to cardiac arrhythmia and death. Pericarditis is inflammation of the membrane around the heart.


A search in the CDC’s Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) revealed 213 cases of pericarditis and myocarditis reported in the U.S following COVID vaccination. Of the 213 cases reported, 105 cases were attributed to Pfizer, 93 cases to Moderna and 15 cases to Johnson & Johnson’s (J&J) COVID vaccine.


On April 27, Reuters reported the U.S. Department of Defense was investigating 14 cases of heart inflammation among people who were vaccinated through the military’s health services.

Of the 14 cases, one patient developed myocarditis after their first dose of vaccine. The remaining 13 patients developed myocarditis after their second vaccine doses. Eleven received the Moderna vaccine and three received Pfizer.


Israel’s Health Ministry is also examining cases of heart inflammation in people who received Pfizer’s COVID vaccine. As The Defender reported April 26, a preliminary report by the committee tasked with monitoring vaccine side effects in Israel identified 62 cases of myocarditis, including two deaths, after recent vaccination with Pfizer. Fifty-five of the cases occurred in men — most between ages 18 and 30.


In the case of AstraZeneca, PRAC said it is examining reports of Guillain–Barré syndrome and asked for more detailed data and an analysis of all reported Guillain–Barré syndrome cases.


Guillain–Barré syndrome is a rare immune disorder in which the body’s immune system attacks the nerves resulting in paralysis. It had been previously identified by regulators as a potential adverse side effect that required monitoring following AstraZeneca’s shot.


EMA recommends updates to labels, lists of side effects


The EMA’s May 7 report also included the recommendation that Pfizer add a new side effect to its product information for people with dermal fillers — soft, gel-like substances injected under the skin.


After reviewing all available evidence, including cases reported to the European database for suspected side effects and data from scientific literature, PRAC said there is at least a “reasonable possibility of a causal association between the vaccine and the reported cases of facial swelling in people with a history of injections with dermal fillers.”


The safety committee also said it would update its warning for J&J’s COVID vaccine after EU regulators in April identified a link between the shot and blood clots.


Though PRAC said the benefits of the vaccine outweigh the risks, the label will now include advice that patients diagnosed with thrombocytopenia within three weeks of vaccination be actively investigated for signs of thrombosis and that patients who present with thromboembolism within three weeks be evaluated for thrombocytopenia.


Thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome will also be added as an “important identified risk” in the risk management plan for J&J’s vaccine. The committee asked the company to provide a plan to further study the possible underlying mechanisms for these events.


Additionally, PRAC looked at clotting risks with Pfizer and Moderna vaccines. Though several cases of low blood platelets and blood clots were identified, the committee concluded that for the moment there does not seem to be any evidence of a safety signal for the mRNA shots.


Utilizing a search criteria that included reports of blood clots associated with blood clotting disorders, VAERS yielded a total of 2,808 reports in the U.S for all three vaccines from Dec. 14, 2020, through April 30. Of the 2,808 cases reported, there were 1,043 reports of blood clotting disorders attributed to Pfizer.


As The Defender reported Monday, a Utah teen remains hospitalized with three blood clots in and near his brain that developed after he received the first dose of Pfizer’s COVID vaccine.


On May 7, Pfizer became the first COVID vaccine producer to request full approval by the U.S Food and Drug Administration for ages 16 and up. Pfizer requested priority review, which asks the FDA to take action within six months, compared to 10 months designated under standard review.


The FDA is expected to amend Pfizer’s Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) this week to authorize use of the vaccine in adolescents aged 12 to 15. The company announced plans to further expand EUA for its vaccine for children ages 2 to 11 in September.


If approved, Pfizer will be the first experimental vaccine to receive full approval by the FDA.
 

Teen Hospitalized With Blood Clots in Brain After First Dose of Pfizer Vaccine​


The mother of the 17-year-old, whose symptoms were initially dismissed as a pulled neck muscle, said she regrets her decision to allow him to be vaccinated.

A Utah teen remains hospitalized with three blood clots in and near his brain that developed after he received the first dose of Pfizer’s COVID vaccine.


Everest Romney, 17, received the vaccine April 21 and began experiencing neck pain, fever and severe headaches one day later. His mother, Cherie Romney, said her son’s pediatrician initially dismissed the symptoms as a pulled neck muscle. However, she was convinced it was something else, ABC4 News reported.


After more than a week of symptoms and being unable to freely move his neck, the family got this diagnosis: two blood clots inside his brain, and one on the outside.


“In a million years, I never expected it,” Romney said. “The worst thing, the worst thing, is to have the doctor come in and say, ‘OK, well, we found two blood clots inside his brain.’ The hardest thing was I let him get that shot. And he was healthy and well before. But you question it, you can’t help but question it when it all goes wrong.”


Everest was released from the ICU May 5, but has a long way to go. His mother said it’s unclear how long he will be in the hospital. “We needed a miracle, we still still do. But we believe in miracles,” she said.


Romney doesn’t want to discourage parents from letting their kids get the vaccine because she believes each parent must make the decision for their children, but she wished her choice had been a different one.


The Utah Department of Health told FOX 13 the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) is tasked with investigating possible vaccine side-effects.


“In weighing the risk and benefits with COVID as opposed to COVID vaccinations, we strongly encourage our patients to become vaccinated because the risk is much less than the risk of the disease,” said University of Utah Health’s Dr. Richard Orlandi in a press conference.

After administering nearly 100 million doses of Pfizer’s vaccine, the CDC reported there hasn’t been a single related case of a blood clot forming in the brain as of April 12.


The CDC’s statement contradicts numerous news reports, studies, scientists and the agency’s own system for monitoring adverse reactions, the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS).


Utilizing a search criteria that included reports of blood clots associated with blood clotting disorders, VAERS yielded a total of 2,808 reports for all three vaccines from Dec. 14, 2020, through April 30. Of the 2,808 cases reported, there were 1,043 reports of blood clotting disorders attributed to Pfizer.


As The Defender reported in April, scientists warned U.S regulatory officials as far back as December 2020 that Pfizer and Moderna COVID vaccines pose similar blood clot risks as the Johnson & Johnson.


A study published in February in the Journal of Hematology examined thrombocytopenia following Pfizer and Moderna vaccination in response to the death of a 56-year-old Florida physician — the first identified patient who died from a brain hemorrhage 15 days after receiving Pfizer’s vaccine.


Researchers examined 20 case reports of patients with immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) following vaccination, including 17 without pre‐existing thrombocytopenia using data from the CDC, U.S Food and Drug Administration (FDA), U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, VAERS, published reports and communications with patients and treating providers.


After analyzing data, researchers could not exclude the possibility that the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines had the potential to trigger ITP and recommended additional surveillance to determine the incidence of thrombocytopenia post vaccination.


A study released by Oxford University found the number of people who developed cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST) blood clots after COVID vaccines was about the same for Pfizer, Moderna and AstraZeneca — the vaccine predominately used in other parts of the world, and which EU regulators linked to blood clots.


According to the Oxford study, 4 in 1 million people experienced CVST during the two weeks following vaccination with the Pfizer or Moderna vaccine, versus 5 in 1 million people with AstraZeneca.


The Association of American Physicians and Surgeons further identified 37 cases of people who developed a rare platelet disorder after receiving the Pfizer or Moderna shot, and informed the FDA that mRNA vaccines, through spike proteins, may have “the potential to cause microvascular injury [inflammation and small blood clots called microthrombi] to the brain, heart, liver and kidneys in ways that were not assessed in the safety trials.” The FDA never responded.


On Dec. 8, 2020, before any COVID vaccines received Emergency Use Authorization in the U.S., Harvard-trained physician J. Patrick Whelan, M.D., Ph.D., wrote the FDA about the potential for vaccines designed to create immunity to the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein “to cause microvascular injury and blood clots throughout the body including the brain, heart, liver and kidneys in ways that were not assessed in the safety trials.”


Whelan acknowledged the vaccines’ potential to quickly arrest the spread of the virus — assuming vaccines prove to actually prevent transmission, which also was not assessed in the clinical trials. But he cautioned “it would be vastly worse if hundreds of millions of people were to suffer long-lasting or even permanent damage to their brain or heart microvasculature as a result of failing to appreciate in the short-term an unintended effect of full-length spike protein-based vaccines on other organs.”


Last month, Johnson & Johnson reached out to Pfizer, Moderna and AstraZeneca to join a study on the potential of the COVID vaccines’ to cause blood clots. Officials at AstraZeneca said they were interested, but Pfizer and Moderna declined to participate in the study.
 
Mr. Krinkle said:

EU Regulators Call on Pfizer, Moderna, AstraZeneca for More Data on Heart Inflammation, Guillain–Barré Syndrome​


The European Medicines Agency also wants Pfizer and Johnson & Johnson to update warnings and lists of side effects relating to face swelling (Pfizer) and blood clots (J&J).

EU regulators Friday called on Pfizer and Moderna to provide additional data related to the companies’ COVID vaccines and a potential link to heart inflammation, after the agency completed a safety review of all four COVID vaccines authorized for emergency use in the EU.


The European Medicines Agency’s safety committee, (PRAC), also asked AstraZeneca for data related to reports of Guillain–Barré syndrome in people who received the AstraZeneca vaccine, and they recommended Pfizer and Johnson & Johnson (J&J) update their labels with side effect warnings.


In a report issued May 7, PRAC disclosed its members were aware of cases of myocarditis and pericarditis following Pfizer vaccination. Regulators said they didn’t see an indication the vaccine caused these cases, but as a prevention, PRAC requested Pfizer provide further data, including an analysis of events according to age and gender in its next pandemic summary safety report and will consider if any other regulatory action is needed.


Because Moderna and Pfizer use the same mRNA technology for their vaccines, the committee asked Moderna to monitor for similar cases of heart inflammation.


Myocarditis, or inflammation of the heart muscle, can lead to cardiac arrhythmia and death. Pericarditis is inflammation of the membrane around the heart.


A search in the CDC’s Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) revealed 213 cases of pericarditis and myocarditis reported in the U.S following COVID vaccination. Of the 213 cases reported, 105 cases were attributed to Pfizer, 93 cases to Moderna and 15 cases to Johnson & Johnson’s (J&J) COVID vaccine.


On April 27, Reuters reported the U.S. Department of Defense was investigating 14 cases of heart inflammation among people who were vaccinated through the military’s health services.

Of the 14 cases, one patient developed myocarditis after their first dose of vaccine. The remaining 13 patients developed myocarditis after their second vaccine doses. Eleven received the Moderna vaccine and three received Pfizer.


Israel’s Health Ministry is also examining cases of heart inflammation in people who received Pfizer’s COVID vaccine. As The Defender reported April 26, a preliminary report by the committee tasked with monitoring vaccine side effects in Israel identified 62 cases of myocarditis, including two deaths, after recent vaccination with Pfizer. Fifty-five of the cases occurred in men — most between ages 18 and 30.


In the case of AstraZeneca, PRAC said it is examining reports of Guillain–Barré syndrome and asked for more detailed data and an analysis of all reported Guillain–Barré syndrome cases.


Guillain–Barré syndrome is a rare immune disorder in which the body’s immune system attacks the nerves resulting in paralysis. It had been previously identified by regulators as a potential adverse side effect that required monitoring following AstraZeneca’s shot.


EMA recommends updates to labels, lists of side effects


The EMA’s May 7 report also included the recommendation that Pfizer add a new side effect to its product information for people with dermal fillers — soft, gel-like substances injected under the skin.


After reviewing all available evidence, including cases reported to the European database for suspected side effects and data from scientific literature, PRAC said there is at least a “reasonable possibility of a causal association between the vaccine and the reported cases of facial swelling in people with a history of injections with dermal fillers.”


The safety committee also said it would update its warning for J&J’s COVID vaccine after EU regulators in April identified a link between the shot and blood clots.


Though PRAC said the benefits of the vaccine outweigh the risks, the label will now include advice that patients diagnosed with thrombocytopenia within three weeks of vaccination be actively investigated for signs of thrombosis and that patients who present with thromboembolism within three weeks be evaluated for thrombocytopenia.


Thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome will also be added as an “important identified risk” in the risk management plan for J&J’s vaccine. The committee asked the company to provide a plan to further study the possible underlying mechanisms for these events.


Additionally, PRAC looked at clotting risks with Pfizer and Moderna vaccines. Though several cases of low blood platelets and blood clots were identified, the committee concluded that for the moment there does not seem to be any evidence of a safety signal for the mRNA shots.


Utilizing a search criteria that included reports of blood clots associated with blood clotting disorders, VAERS yielded a total of 2,808 reports in the U.S for all three vaccines from Dec. 14, 2020, through April 30. Of the 2,808 cases reported, there were 1,043 reports of blood clotting disorders attributed to Pfizer.


As The Defender reported Monday, a Utah teen remains hospitalized with three blood clots in and near his brain that developed after he received the first dose of Pfizer’s COVID vaccine.


On May 7, Pfizer became the first COVID vaccine producer to request full approval by the U.S Food and Drug Administration for ages 16 and up. Pfizer requested priority review, which asks the FDA to take action within six months, compared to 10 months designated under standard review.


The FDA is expected to amend Pfizer’s Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) this week to authorize use of the vaccine in adolescents aged 12 to 15. The company announced plans to further expand EUA for its vaccine for children ages 2 to 11 in September.


If approved, Pfizer will be the first experimental vaccine to receive full approval by the FDA.
Click to expand...
Mate, quick one. To say, thanks for trying to provide what seems your own and absolute truth on all this. It’s refreshing, interesting to me. And with that twist of humour often which I always love.


I, lacking in that. Hence, no cred. I reference old Syd B a lot because I am of a somethwhat similar nature. Not so real world, empirically anylytical, real world whizzy with sources, graphics.


I just know as a result of the horrific path of education major Lyme forced me, how insanely contrived, controlled and conditioned our entire society is.

I still have my own consciousness. I wish to be as clean as I can and use that to best good. 1st step....little less LSD.


This topic is so close to my heart, I’ve abandoned the fun and on topic education I could offer occasionally here, my sole original purpose for joining here two years ago.
 

and what do you know, just came out 2 hours ago....​

​

Fauci admits COVID-19 could have come from Wuhan lab, butts heads with Rand Paul​


Dr. Anthony Fauci on Tuesday admitted that COVID-19 could have originated in a lab in Wuhan, China — and acknowledged there should be further investigation into the possibility.


The nation’s top infectious-disease doc made the acknowledgment on Capitol Hill while getting grilled by US senators — including Republican Rand Paul, who heatedly butted heads with him over alleged government funding of the lab.


Fauci was flat-out asked by GOP Sen. Roger Marshall, a doctor from Kansas, “Do you think it’s possible that COVID-19 arose from a lab accident … in Wuhan, and should it be fully investigated?”


The National Institutes of Health official replied, “That possibility certainly exists, and I am totally in favor of a full investigation of whether that could have happened.”


Fauci had said a few months after the start of the pandemic that the deadly virus most likely “evolved in nature and then jumped species,’’ as opposed to being “artificially or deliberately manipulated.”


Earlier, Paul, of Kentucky, pressed Fauci over alleged US funding of the Chinese lab involving so-called “gain of function’’ research.


The research focuses on making a virus more potent in the laboratory as a way to produce better vaccines against it.

“Sen. Paul, with all due respect, you are entirely, entirely and completely incorrect … the NIH has not ever and does not now fund gain of function research in the Wuhan Institute,” Fauci said.





In addition to the funding flap, Paul pressed Fauci over the potential link between the virus outbreak and the lab, too.


In March, the World Health Organization released a controversial report saying it is “extremely unlikely’’ that the pandemic was caused by a virus leak at the lab.


The WHO findings — which were criticized partly because they lacked potentially crucial data from a secretive Chinese government — said humans likely became infected through an animal that got the virus from bats.

Fauci said at the time that he wanted to review the WHO’s raw data.


“I’d also would like to inquire as to the extent in which the people who were on that group had access directly to the data that they would need to make a determination,” he said. “I want to read the report first and then get a feel for what they really had access to — or did not have access to.”


Still, the same month, Fauci appeared to downplay comments by former CDC Director Dr. Robert Redfield that the coronavirus was created in the Wuhan lab, saying Redfield was simply expressing his “opinion” when he made the claim.
 
Mr. Krinkle said:
www.newsweek.com

Dr. Fauci Backed Controversial Wuhan Lab with U.S. Dollars

Biomedical research ultimately helps protect public health, Dr. Fauci argued in explaining his support for controversial research.
www.newsweek.com www.newsweek.com


and read that



now tell me this:

you expect me to trust the very same people who played a roll in creating this pandemic, with injecting me with a shot that they have no liability in?
Click to expand...
Sometimes in life You just have to laugh and I make this reference towards nobody in particular.

But I find great irony and humour in the idea of my own sanity being questioned for essentially so vehemently distrusting the government.
 
Last edited:
AutoTripper said:
Sometimes in life You just have to laugh and I’ll make this reference towards nobody in particular.

But I find great irony and humour in the idea of my own sanity being questioned for essentially so vehemently distrusting the government.
Click to expand...

Right....we're nuts and they're not

but hey ya know what they say right? it's better to be insane in a sane world than it is to be sane in an insane world...or something like that anyway


also: i'd rather have a bottle in front of me than a frontal lobotomy
 
Mr. Krinkle said:
Right....we're nuts and they're not

but hey ya know what they say right? it's better to be insane in a sane world than it is to be sane in an insane world...or something like that anyway


also: i'd rather have a bottle in front of me than a frontal lobotomy
Click to expand...
It’s surely much easier. But as much as it hurts, I would never give up my sanity or knowledge, I just need some bodily repairs.
 
Mr. Krinkle said:
chinup's gonna wake up tomorrow, hungover, and she's gonna have to read all this and try to debunk it all before she even gets her labcoat on for the day

=D
Click to expand...
she could probably do it in her sleep, she loves it :)

Edit, also the "us and them" motifs you promote above, just not helpful at all and fuels a fire nobody really wants burning...easy
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top