its possible to care about other people without wanting to literally pay for other people's poor decisions.
i don't get why you support people making those decisions so strongly, yet you seem to think that, rather than people taking responsibility for the consequences of their own decisions, society should bear that responsibility.
it is purely pragmatic, being facetious about it, I don't do a moral reckoning on it because that is for God and she said let it go when I asked her.
I hold this position because otherwise where do you draw the line? you are essentially dividing people into deserving/worthy and undeserving/unworthy, but you naturally include yourself in the former category. Objectively this is may or may not be the case. Other people will have different divisions of worthy and unworthy, kuffar, non-kuffar or whatever.
No matter what you do you will pay for other peoples choices, good bad or indifferent.
It is easier, more expedient and more effective to convince people to act in what you hope is their own interest which more often than not aligns with the wider interest. The corollary is allowing other people to weigh up what works for them and respecting their choice, even if you think that they are making a wrong decision, it is not your decision to make.
I reminded of what Martin Niemöller taught us, I don't agree with the extreme antivaxxer position I don't really like socialists either, but Niemöller's warning stands. That is why I support choice.
If you can't convince them then that is a failure of your persuasion efforts, a failure of the persuader , resorting to coercion, ad baculum the stick shows that you never truly intended to persuade debate discuss or convince. Using implicit or explicit force to persuade means at that point you have lost.
If you have to coerce then you have lost.
Covid is not special. The current situation is not special and I am very wary of allowing authoritarians any leeway whatsoever.
Other people will indirectly pay for your dumb decisions and vice versa, but the personal direct consequences are much more significant and are borne by individuals.
We established that the risk from of infection from unvaccinated individuals to vaccinated individuals is minuscule and of the same order as that posed by vaccinated individuals with primary or secondary vaccine failure to other vaccinated individuals. Therefore the threat to me from an unvaccinated individual is inconsequential and it doesn't matter in the wider scheme either., as the risk is moderated by whether I personally am vaccinated or not.
This is why I don't care if other people are vaccinated or not. You seem not to want to accept that as a truth because it goes contrary to your strongly ultilitarian beliefs or something something moralistic. Other people take a more pragmatic view of what vaccines can and cannot do and beyond offering individual protection the case is very weak indeed.
The person that cares most about your well being is you, you have the most skin in that particular game, plan accordingly.
off topic,
Your employer is not God, No employer is God. You may have noticed that already, Don't delude yourself that the business you work for cares about you, it simply doesn't, workers are fungible to modern business. There may be much talk of collective purpose and team where you work but it is an illusion a useful lie. Push comes to shove you will be canned like all other supplicants no matter how loyal and how loudly you support them.
The government is not God either, very far from it.