Conspiracies Bill Gates Denies Coronavirus Vaccine is 5G Mind Control Chip

[JessFR]

It's wild to me how people have vilified Bill Gates so hard when he's one of the few billionaires actually using his wealth to do something positive for the world, most notably massively reducing case counts and deaths due to malaria. Yet to many, it is self-evident and beyond discussion that he is anything but an evil satanic beast bent on world destruction, mind control, and pretty much all of the other ills befalling the world, real or imagined. I'd be pretty sad if I were him.

He got rich because he was the CEO of Microsoft. He then started a foundation to try to help people in Africa and elsewhere. There's nothing mysterious about why he's involved in world health organizations.

Cause people are idiots.

It's as I've said before. What this is blaming the people preaching fire safety for the existence of fires.

A PANDEMIC WAS INEVITABLE. IT'S NOT A FUCKING COINCIDENCE THAT THERE WERE PEOPLE WORRIED ABOUT THIS BEFORE IT HAPPENED.

 

[dalpat077]

Cause people are idiots.

It's as I've said before. What this is blaming the people preaching fire safety for the existence of fires.

A PANDEMIC WAS INEVITABLE. IT'S NOT A FUCKING COINCIDENCE THAT THERE WERE PEOPLE WORRIED ABOUT THIS BEFORE IT HAPPENED.

Tell us how you really feel why don't you!

 

[JessFR]

Tell us how you really feel why don't you!

I'm a bit on edge yeah. You can blame @Captain.Heroin for that.

 

[JGrimez]

It's wild to me how people have vilified Bill Gates so hard when he's one of the few billionaires actually using his wealth to do something positive for the world, most notably massively reducing case counts and deaths due to malaria. Yet to many, it is self-evident and beyond discussion that he is anything but an evil satanic beast bent on world destruction, mind control, and pretty much all of the other ills befalling the world, real or imagined. I'd be pretty sad if I were him.

He got rich because he was the CEO of Microsoft. He then started a foundation to try to help people in Africa and elsewhere. There's nothing mysterious about why he's involved in world health organizations.

This is an example of falling for propaganda. Billionaires can easily pay media organizations to publish puff pieces about them which paint them in a good light and shift public perception (or hide damaging stories eg. the Indian polio scandal). That's literally the only reason why you're under the impression that Bill Gates is some kind of philanthropic baby-protector. It's obvious nonsense, and it only takes a cursory glance at the history of his Foundation to make it self-evident. Look at how much money he has, why don't these billionaires cure world hunger? Ever think of that? They easily have the means to do so and there are countless children dying every minute from starvation. Ohhh but Bill Gate is SO GENEROUS for injecting children with experimental drugs that he PROFITS from..... damn he's so selfless.... BTW you might want to investigate what Kenyan media (and no media in the West) have to say about his tetanus vaccine operation there. And I can't wait for your 'logical' reason as to why a few philanthropic billionaires haven't eliminated world hunger. It should be better than "healthy people have less babies" which is observably not true.

A PANDEMIC WAS INEVITABLE. IT'S NOT A FUCKING COINCIDENCE THAT THERE WERE PEOPLE WORRIED ABOUT THIS BEFORE IT HAPPENED.

Serious question, are you even aware of this?
'Dr. Fauci Backed Controversial Wuhan Lab with U.S. Dollars for Risky Coronavirus Research'

But just last year, the National Institute for Allergy and Infectious Diseases, the organization led by Dr. Fauci, funded scientists at the Wuhan Institute of Virology and other institutions for work on gain-of-function research on bat coronaviruses.

Do you know what gain-of-function means? It's a term for biological research aimed at increasing the virulence and lethality of pathogens and viruses. If you believe they were worried, then why would they fund research to make viruses MORE lethal in a country like fucking China of all places?? Does that hint at them being worried about a pandemic? Bill Gates laughs and chuckles when being interviewed about it. Use logic.

So Fauci, Wuhan Lab, increasing the lethality of coronaviruses, trying to make bat coronaviruses infectious between humans, Event 201 which was a simulation organized by Gates, WEF - running exactly what happened in 2020 mere months before the pandemic began.
When you see these facts, do you just go ..."oh well, that all must just be a coincidence!" ?
You are SO averse to the possibility of any group of elites doing anything negative that you must choose to willfully ignore so many connections.

 

[dalpat077]

I'm a bit on edge yeah. You can blame @Captain.Heroin for that.

Well I obviously missed that part or interaction!

But for what it's worth: I do think people should maybe take a step back and look at the bigger picture. I find myself doing that a lot these days if the truth be told.

This thread and that patent are a fine example. My initial knee jerk reaction was one of horror (especially when I read the patent). But then after thinking about it as noted: I can see that working. And really: anybody that's concerned about privacy shouldn't be on the Internet. Period. I'll bet Google knows more about me than I know about me already. And for sure I wouldn't mind actually earning money for clicking on an annoying advertisement (that in some cases you're not even able to bypass anyway so may as well get paid for my trouble and for wasting my time).

As for this vaccine stuff: I don't see how it's any different from, for example, ensuring that your military is up-to-date with the latest in technology. I mean: at some point in the future the shit is going to hit the fan. So you may as well be ready for it (type of thing). And using the same analogy: it stands to reason, especially on this scale, that it's going to have adverse effects on certain individuals. Collateral damage and inevitable I'm afraid. And before anybody lays into me for that statement: I happen to live with somebody whose life has been totally fucked for the last twenty (or more i.e. cannot recall right now exactly how long ago it was and she's not here right now to ask) years because of an adverse reaction (sent immune system into overdrive and basically almost wiped her out at the time and damage caused after recovery was permanent) to the flu vaccines and that were mandated by their employer at the time. So I'm not being callous. Fact of that matter is that shit happens. Who knows how many people didn't get, or die from, the flu that particular year as a result of said vaccine (although and full disclosure: not something I've ever had nor will ever have i.e. a flu vaccine but that's just me). In her case: she's precluded from being mandated to be administered any COVID vaccine due to a, permanent as a result of said flu vaccine, compromised immune system. And let's be honest: other than the fact that these COVID vaccines have been rushed how is this any different to any other pharmaceuticals? These very forums are testament to the fact that not everyone is going to respond favorably to a certain medication i.e. a small minority will have an adverse reaction. Unfortunate but it is what it is.

Personal opinion in the case of COVID vaccines: I think WAY too much faith and hope is being put into them. I reckon this shit is going to be a round for a long long time to come. And albeit that I'm no medical professional: I cannot help but think that the more we fuck with viruses the better the chances of them mutating (in pretty much the same way as we now have treatment resistant bacteria). But hey: that's just me and based on the notion that if it's based down it's just one organism competing for survival against another. Just an opinion. One thing for sure though: Pfizer & Co. are guaranteed income for MANY years to come (I got no issues with that for the record)! And I also do keep asking myself just how much MORE we'd be fucked were it NOT for the Spanish Flu (for example). I wonder what the total population of the world would be today had those fifty million people (at very least apparently) survived and if extrapolated out? I suppose there's research on this but not interested enough to find the data i.e. for sure not going to change my life. And I have a funny odd feeling that we're going to see those figures again. When this shit first started I took it all with a pinch of salt. But from where I'm sitting and looking at the figures now: who knows.

Mind control? I think too many people have been making too many zombie apocalypse movies and too many have been watching them. I seriously doubt that anybody is looking into controlling people to the extent where somebody can push a button and MAKE you go have a shit! But as for biometric identification: well now. For sure would have solved some election problems!

Anyway. Thesis for the day done. Back to the BUSINESS of narcotics!

 

[dalpat077]

This is an example of falling for propaganda. Billionaires can easily pay media organizations to publish puff pieces about them which paint them in a good light and shift public perception (or hide damaging stories eg. the Indian polio scandal). That's literally the only reason why you're under the impression that Bill Gates is some kind of philanthropic baby-protector. It's obvious nonsense, and it only takes a cursory glance at the history of his Foundation to make it self-evident. Look at how much money he has, why don't these billionaires cure world hunger? Ever think of that? They easily have the means to do so and there are countless children dying every minute from starvation. Ohhh but Bill Gate is SO GENEROUS for injecting children with experimental drugs that he PROFITS from..... damn he's so selfless.... BTW you might want to investigate what Kenyan media (and no media in the West) have to say about his tetanus vaccine operation there. And I can't wait for your 'logical' reason as to why a few philanthropic billionaires haven't eliminated world hunger. It should be better than "healthy people have less babies" which is observably not true.


Serious question, are you even aware of this?
'Dr. Fauci Backed Controversial Wuhan Lab with U.S. Dollars for Risky Coronavirus Research'


Do you know what gain-of-function means? It's a term for biological research aimed at increasing the virulence and lethality of pathogens and viruses. If you believe they were worried, then why would they fund research to make viruses MORE lethal in a country like fucking China of all places?? Does that hint at them being worried about a pandemic? Bill Gates laughs and chuckles when being interviewed about it. Use logic.

So Fauci, Wuhan Lab, increasing the lethality of coronaviruses, trying to make bat coronaviruses infectious between humans, Event 201 which was a simulation organized by Gates, WEF - running exactly what happened in 2020 mere months before the pandemic began.
When you see these facts, do you just go ..."oh well, that all must just be a coincidence!" ?
You are SO averse to the possibility of any group of elites doing anything negative that you must choose to willfully ignore so many connections.

Sorry my man. You have my full support on the American elections. But this is a stretch.

Coming from Africa let me give you a bit of advice or input: I'd have CNN and FOX and the other usual suspects over any Kenyan media any day of the week! I still don't think that people in America or in other first world countries understand what they're dealing with when it comes to Africa. And I'm not wasting my time nor running the risk of incurring a temporary ban to explain in further detail.

And I've watched some of these videos. I don't see him laughing or smiling. Maybe at the ridiculousness of it all yes. I know I would eventually get to the point, if it were me, that'd I'd laugh when my motives were being questioned on an ongoing basis out of sheer frustration if nothing else. Probably in much the same way as Ozzy Osbourne nearly collapsed when some lawyer said that if you play one of his tracks backwards you can clearly hear the words "get the gun, get the gun, shoot, shoot, shoot, shoot" (while trying to sue the poor bastard for the death of some unstable half wit that shot himself while listening to "Suicide Solution"). I mean eventually this shit gets comical when repeated over and over and over again.

And to date nobody has provided a reason as to why a certain group of people would like to control the world. For financial reasons? They have more money than they could spend in their lifetimes even if they shut up shop TODAY. But who knows. Maybe I'm naive. Probably am. All I know is that I can think of nothing fucking worse than controlling the entire world and having to put up with people and their shit on a daily basis. Fuck. Seems to me it's difficult enough just to control and appease and please Americans and America (for example). Imagine having to do that on a global scale? Unless, as I said in an earlier post, these are just some type of very special next level nutcases! Or maybe they are all reptilians! In which case I'd not worry too much i.e. they cannot be that advanced or that clever to have taken THIS long to wipe out the world or control the world.

And at the risk of pissing you off badly you're starting to sound like a Democrat with the statement: "You are SO averse to the possibility of any group of elites doing anything negative that you must choose to willfully ignore so many connections."!

 

[JGrimez]

Sorry my man. You have my full support on the American elections. But this is a stretch.

Just because something is a stretch doesn't mean it isn't true. That's where the evidence leads, it only seems outlandish because the MSM has been saying something completely different. And we know for a fact that governments and military all around the world fuck around with deadly viruses. IIRC there was a law that prohibited groups from altering viruses to be more deadly but they repealed the law. Smart huh?

Coming from Africa let me give you a bit of advice or input: I'd have CNN and FOX and the other usual suspects over any Kenyan media any day of the week! I still don't think that people in America or in other first world countries understand what they're dealing with when it comes to Africa. And I'm not wasting my time nor running the risk of incurring a temporary ban to explain in further detail.

Thinking that US mainstream media is any more honest than Kenya's is wishful thinking and I'm talking about one specific, potentially-explosive incident. The point is that Gates has the Western news media in his pocket. Which is why people are under the impression that he's a nice guy. In the 90's he wasn't very popular due to his dodgy dealings with Microsoft and acting suspicious and evasive in interrogations. It's not that impressive that money can buy you positive media attention which alters your public image over time (look at Ellen for an example of someone who was portrayed to be super nice and loving who turned out to be an absolute c*nt).

And I've watched some of these videos. I don't see him laughing or smiling.

And to date nobody has provided a reason as to why a certain group of people would like to control the world. For financial reasons? They have more money than they could spend in their lifetimes even if they shut up shop TODAY. But who knows. Maybe I'm naive. Probably am.

Yes you are, but I don't judge you for that because you are respectful and open-minded.
Basically we are being fucked over by a few elites. That's obvious when you look at the state of middle-class and how we've progressively been screwed over ie. wages have stagnated but they've increased to disgusting levels for the upper-class and the super-rich. It's been a steady transfer of wealth (which accelerated dramatically in 2020). The way the elites keep people in check is by deception and propaganda. But this isn't a comfortable situation for them - as they're constantly fearful of the masses, the 99.99% finding out how the system is set up. Leaks, whistleblowers, there's been many glimpses over the years into how the system operates and they're very good at getting rid of big problems which adds to the motivation for people to keep quiet if they know something.

So before they can allow this to happen, what the 'elite controllers' need to do is remove our ability to seek justice against them. One way would be to implement restrictive policies which go against our own national constitutions. Or to make it illegal for people to protest. Or to make it illegal for more than a few people to meet privately in person for any reason. This would prevent political activist parties from forming and communicating secretly without electronic devices. So keep people at home, track their comms and stamp out any murmur of organized resistance.

What a coincidence, all those things happened last year under the guise of a deadly virus (which isn't that deadly and DEFINITELY does not warrant all of these extremely restrictive social measures).
Another thing to note is that the results of the Covid lockdowns has resulted in what the Global Warming crowd has been demanding for decades - banning air travel, shutting down businesses etc - watch how this covid pandemic turns into a climate lockdown and a "good opportunity" to completely revamp our social structures. Of course it will sound nice and amazing but in reality it will be a form of climate/health-backed communist/totalitarian system where everything we do is tracked and regulated. Do a bit of research into the World Economic Forum's "Great Reset" that they've been talking about implementing soon (a few months ago it was a conspiracy theory).

All I know is that I can think of nothing fucking worse than controlling the entire world and having to put up with people and their shit on a daily basis. Fuck. Seems to me it's difficult enough just to control and appease and please Americans and America (for example). Imagine having to do that on a global scale? Unless, as I said in an earlier post, these are just some type of very special next level nutcases! Or maybe they are all reptilians! In which case I'd not worry too much i.e. they cannot be that advanced or that clever to have taken THIS long to wipe out the world or control the world.

You could wipe out a whole bunch of people, that would make it easier.

And at the risk of pissing you off badly you're starting to sound like a Democrat with the statement: "You are SO averse to the possibility of any group of elites doing anything negative that you must choose to willfully ignore so many connections."!

haha not sure how that works, I call out anyone who's lying or ignorantly shitting on others. In many ways the GOP is worse than the Dems because they're pretending to fight for the rights of the people but they're basically token resistance and facilitators for this communist-style government overthrow. The GOP has even basically forsaken Trump which will result in the death of their party. I give zero fucks about the left/right divide anymore. This divide is now between people who accept truth and people who accept the cult of lies. And 1/3 of Democrat voters understand and admit that the election was stolen. They'd rather lose than have their country destroyed. Unfortunately many others have bought into the cult of lies and don't care (or don't have the capacity to understand what's happening).

 

[dalpat077]

Just because something is a stretch doesn't mean it isn't true. That's where the evidence leads, it only seems outlandish because the MSM has been saying something completely different. And we know for a fact that governments and military all around the world fuck around with deadly viruses. IIRC there was a law that prohibited groups from altering viruses to be more deadly but they repealed the law. Smart huh?


Thinking that US mainstream media is any more honest than Kenya's is wishful thinking and I'm talking about one specific, potentially-explosive incident. The point is that Gates has the Western news media in his pocket. Which is why people are under the impression that he's a nice guy. In the 90's he wasn't very popular due to his dodgy dealings with Microsoft and acting suspicious and evasive in interrogations. It's not that impressive that money can buy you positive media attention which alters your public image over time (look at Ellen for an example of someone who was portrayed to be super nice and loving who turned out to be an absolute c*nt).








Yes you are, but I don't judge you for that because you are respectful and open-minded.
Basically we are being fucked over by a few elites. That's obvious when you look at the state of middle-class and how we've progressively been screwed over ie. wages have stagnated but they've increased to disgusting levels for the upper-class and the super-rich. It's been a steady transfer of wealth (which accelerated dramatically in 2020). The way the elites keep people in check is by deception and propaganda. But this isn't a comfortable situation for them - as they're constantly fearful of the masses, the 99.99% finding out how the system is set up. Leaks, whistleblowers, there's been many glimpses over the years into how the system operates and they're very good at getting rid of big problems which adds to the motivation for people to keep quiet if they know something.

So before they can allow this to happen, what the 'elite controllers' need to do is remove our ability to seek justice against them. One way would be to implement restrictive policies which go against our own national constitutions. Or to make it illegal for people to protest. Or to make it illegal for more than a few people to meet privately in person for any reason. This would prevent political activist parties from forming and communicating secretly without electronic devices. So keep people at home, track their comms and stamp out any murmur of organized resistance.

What a coincidence, all those things happened last year under the guise of a deadly virus (which isn't that deadly and DEFINITELY does not warrant all of these extremely restrictive social measures).
Another thing to note is that the results of the Covid lockdowns has resulted in what the Global Warming crowd has been demanding for decades - banning air travel, shutting down businesses etc - watch how this covid pandemic turns into a climate lockdown and a "good opportunity" to completely revamp our social structures. Of course it will sound nice and amazing but in reality it will be a form of climate/health-backed communist/totalitarian system where everything we do is tracked and regulated. Do a bit of research into the World Economic Forum's "Great Reset" that they've been talking about implementing soon (a few months ago it was a conspiracy theory).


You could wipe out a whole bunch of people, that would make it easier.


haha not sure how that works, I call out anyone who's lying or ignorantly shitting on others. In many ways the GOP is worse than the Dems because they're pretending to fight for the rights of the people but they're basically token resistance and facilitators for this communist-style government overthrow. The GOP has even basically forsaken Trump which will result in the death of their party. I give zero fucks about the left/right divide anymore. This divide is now between people who accept truth and people who accept the cult of lies. And 1/3 of Democrat voters understand and admit that the election was stolen. They'd rather lose than have their country destroyed. Unfortunately many others have bought into the cult of lies and don't care (or don't have the capacity to understand what's happening).

Very nice post.

I'm not going to argue with you. You and I have a lot in common. We just don't agree on some of these issues. Or rather we have a different standpoint or interpretation. Who knows. Maybe we're both partially right (or will be over time). Maybe this all starts out nice and then gets taken over for bad. That is a possibility let's face it. Then again: define "bad"! Imagine if there was a switch that could have been flipped and Trump won 100% or the popular vote!

And don't put ideas in my head (about taking over the world and wiping out a whole bunch of people)! I've just made Russia an offer for ONE person!

My ONLY criticism (as opposed to a difference of opinion between you and I) are those videos. I have watched them. More than once. Mainly because you posted links to them. And they are edited PRECISELY to have the desired effect that they are having and convey a certain narrative. In EXACTLY the same way as the left NEVER shows a video of a police shooting in its entirety i.e. they conveniently leave out the footage leading up to the reason for the officer eventually losing his shit! And they play it over and over and over again. But when it's found that the perpetrator has himself to blame: that footage, if ever broadcast, gets a thirty second mention between the weather report and an advertisement! Never to be seen again!

I'll tell you one thing I'm really concerned about and that's this AI bullshit. Have you seen these videos where, basically, they can manufacture a video (the example I saw was of President Obama) of a politician (or whoever) speaking. Even as things stand now: you have to look hard to see that it's not the real thing. And THAT technology is only going improve in leaps and bounds. Probably going to get to the point where the person is going to be asking themselves "did I really say that" or "I really don't remember being there" (type of thing). That is scary shit.

Anyway. Keep up the good work my man. In truth: you did make one (but probably more than one) very good point in one of your posts i.e. you only need ONE paper or publication to be correct (trick of course is deciding which paper or publication is indeed the correct one) (generally I find those sites that advertise "clean your bowels every single morning by eating fifty bananas and thirty fried eggs" a bit dodgy when mixed in with what purports to be a serious and newsworthy and trustworthy article but that's just me)!

 

[JessFR]

My ONLY criticism (as opposed to a difference of opinion between you and I) are those videos. I have watched them. More than once. Mainly because you posted links to them. And they are edited PRECISELY to have the desired effect that they are having and convey a certain narrative.

The Left and right have both been doing this trick for a long time now.

Michael Moore is perhaps one of the most well known example of someone who made a career out of those kinds of tricks for the left.

 

[dalpat077]

The Left and right have both been doing this trick for a long time now.

Michael Moore is perhaps one of the most well known example of someone who made a career out of those kinds of tricks for the left.

Where or when have the right EVER done such a thing?

 

[dalpat077]

Where or when have the right EVER done such a thing?

Don't answer that. Because I'm well aware that I just shot myself in the foot! So I've saved you the trouble (and taken the joy and glee out of your answering the question)!

Just wasn't prepared to delete my previous post and then be perceived as a coward! We on the right play open cards and hide nothing you know!

 

[JGrimez]

Very nice post.

I'm not going to argue with you. You and I have a lot in common. We just don't agree on some of these issues. Or rather we have a different standpoint or interpretation. Who knows. Maybe we're both partially right (or will be over time). Maybe this all starts out nice and then gets taken over for bad. That is a possibility let's face it. Then again: define "bad"! Imagine if there was a switch that could have been flipped and Trump won 100% or the popular vote!

And don't put ideas in my head (about taking over the world and wiping out a whole bunch of people)! I've just made Russia an offer for ONE person!

My ONLY criticism (as opposed to a difference of opinion between you and I) are those videos. I have watched them. More than once. Mainly because you posted links to them. And they are edited PRECISELY to have the desired effect that they are having and convey a certain narrative. In EXACTLY the same way as the left NEVER shows a video of a police shooting in its entirety i.e. they conveniently leave out the footage leading up to the reason for the officer eventually losing his shit! And they play it over and over and over again. But when it's found that the perpetrator has himself to blame: that footage, if ever broadcast, gets a thirty second mention between the weather report and an advertisement! Never to be seen again!

I'll tell you one thing I'm really concerned about and that's this AI bullshit. Have you seen these videos where, basically, they can manufacture a video (the example I saw was of President Obama) of a politician (or whoever) speaking. Even as things stand now: you have to look hard to see that it's not the real thing. And THAT technology is only going improve in leaps and bounds. Probably going to get to the point where the person is going to be asking themselves "did I really say that" or "I really don't remember being there" (type of thing). That is scary shit.

Anyway. Keep up the good work my man. In truth: you did make one (but probably more than one) very good point in one of your posts i.e. you only need ONE paper or publication to be correct (trick of course is deciding which paper or publication is indeed the correct one) (generally I find those sites that advertise "clean your bowels every single morning by eating fifty bananas and thirty fried eggs" a bit dodgy when mixed in with what purports to be a serious and newsworthy and trustworthy article but that's just me)!

Those videos are not edited. One of them is Gates talking about the "next pandemic" and he looks like a little kid on Christmas Eve. He's talking and smiling so there's no need to edit it (I believe they're planning something much more destructive and 2020 was just the "trailer").
The other one I've seen from many sources also, that's Gates' candid response to someone mentioning all of the economic devastation. Gates didn't lose money, and he knows that the economy being destroyed is going to pressure people all across the world to purchase his vaccines.
Are you simply assuming that they're edited or do you have some evidence? Because otherwise I'll have to accuse you of acting like a Democrat

Also yes, the 'Deep Fake' technology is concerning but at this point it's not totally convincing and there are ways to detect it forensically.

 

[JessFR]

Those videos are not edited. One of them is Gates talking about the "next pandemic" and he looks like a little kid on Christmas Eve.

If that was the video I saw there wasn't even anything establishing that he was even talking about a pandemic, let alone the context.

If you have nothing to hide, link to the source and give a time code.

The only reason to remove all the context is to deceive people.

 

[JGrimez]

If that was the video I saw there wasn't even anything establishing that he was even talking about a pandemic, let alone the context.

If you have nothing to hide, link to the source and give a time code.

The only reason to remove all the context is to deceive people.

Actually it's to save people time. They just want to see the part where he is acting evil.
I've included parts of the video and if people want to investigate it that's up to them. I know they're legitimate.
Bill Gates is simply a psychopathic, bloodthirsty asshole and it's time to accept it.

 

[JessFR]

Actually it's to save people time. They just want to see the part where he is acting evil.
I've included parts of the video and if people want to investigate it that's up to them. I know they're legitimate.
Bill Gates is simply a psychopathic, bloodthirsty asshole and it's time to accept it.

Sooo, what, we should just rely on your videos being what they claim to be? Is that what do you?

Or are you saying we should find out the truth for ourselves and we shouldn't rely on you for reliable evidence? Cause I'd completely agree on that.

Funny how when the mainstream media does it is dishonesty, when youtube crazies do it its out of concern for our precious time.

What crap.

 

[dalpat077]

Those videos are not edited. One of them is Gates talking about the "next pandemic" and he looks like a little kid on Christmas Eve. He's talking and smiling so there's no need to edit it (I believe they're planning something much more destructive and 2020 was just the "trailer").
The other one I've seen from many sources also, that's Gates' candid response to someone mentioning all of the economic devastation. Gates didn't lose money, and he knows that the economy being destroyed is going to pressure people all across the world to purchase his vaccines.
Are you simply assuming that they're edited or do you have some evidence? Because otherwise I'll have to accuse you of acting like a Democrat

Also yes, the 'Deep Fake' technology is concerning but at this point it's not totally convincing and there are ways to detect it forensically.

Well when I say “edited” I’m referring to the way the section showing his happy smiling face is repeated and repeated and repeated for effect (unless that was you that did that for effect and emphasis). Not saying that the content itself was edited. But if I watch the full video his happy smiling face isn’t conveying the same message or narrative to me as it is to you evidently. Put another way: if your understanding and interpretation of his presentation and demeanour is correct then he’s not going to be very good at pulling this all off on the quiet. And in her case: she just looks to me like someone who is proud of what her husband is saying in an interview.

Different interpretations I guess. I laugh and smile and get all excited and worked up while watching American History X (most of it anyway). Others leave the room and refuse to watch!

 

[JessFR]

Ah so we are talking about the same video.

When I say edited I mean how as I recall the word pandemic isn't even said once and I have to rely on Grimez say so that that's even what they're talking about.

I mean it probably is, I haven't checked because I find doing absolutely nothing a better use of time than endlessly trying to establish the validity of the crap people come out with here. But if you're gonna provide evidence of someone supposedly talking about planning a future pandemic. It would be a lot better if it were self evidently about planning a future pandemic, or about a pandemic at all.

 

[Shady's Fox]

Jess, I think you need to get off the internet for a while dear, you know if you can't there's internet rehabs -- yeah it's a thing. What you're typing, for most of the time it's complete non-sense and people who bother to answer this might need the same thing. What the fuck is that?

 

[JessFR]

Jess, I think you need to get off the internet for a while dear, you know if you can't there's internet rehabs -- yeah it's a thing. What you're typing, for most of the time it's complete non-sense and people who bother to answer this might need the same thing. What the fuck is that?

Fuck rehab. Is there an internet methadone? Id rather have that.

 

[dalpat077]

Actually it's to save people time. They just want to see the part where he is acting evil.
I've included parts of the video and if people want to investigate it that's up to them. I know they're legitimate.

Wait a second. Now YOU just shot yourself in the foot! I never noticed the above while posting my previous response.

That is/was my whole point. If enough conspiracy theorists start uploading only certain portions of interviews on the likes of fucking YouTube (and with click bait titles to boot) then eventually the narrative does hit home to your average idiot and becomes a self fulfilling prophecy!

Four words I've started to hate more than any others in the English language just by the way i.e. "Share", "Like", "Subscribe", and "Ring"!

Also yes, the 'Deep Fake' technology is concerning but at this point it's not totally convincing and there are ways to detect it forensically.

Slippery slope there too my good friend. I've been editing video as a hobby (but with pro software and hardware) for decades. And while you and I may be able to tell the difference: your average idiot will not and will take what they're seeing as gospel. I'm telling you for sure this is very dangerous territory. And the chances of eventually having legislation that requires that every video uploaded carries some certain certificate of authentication or is blocked unless it's been forensically audited are zero.

Actually and come to think of it:

The likes of Zuckerberg & Co. (FB) and Larry Page (Google et al) worry me more than Bill Gates & Co. Not to mention Jack Dorsey (Twitter) and the rest. Put this another way: even IF I agreed with you about Billy Boy there they are the ones providing the platform(s) to reach the masses! And do their very own fair share of biased editing and censorship.