@dalpat077
I swear I'm not trying to mock or call you a liar in saying this, I'm just wanna understand.
If you consume so much American news, how do you think it's possible that you hadn't heard the multitude of times it was brought up that mail in votes were likely to lean towards Biden?
Cause the other day you asked if it was just coincidence that so many mail ins were for biden and a few people got on your case about how you didn't seem to have ever heard the reason, in spite of it being mentioned lots of times by lots of media outlets in the lead up to the election.
I just assumed that must have meant you hadn't consumed much news in the lead-up to the election, but then just now you indicated that you did which bring it back into my mind again.
Why do you think you hadn't heard many times how mail ins were likely to learn democratic, and that as a result and due to Republicans trying to prevent vote counting before the election that there would likely be a so called "red Mirage" where trump initially appears to be winning only for Biden to come back as the mail ins were counted.
Again I'm just asking cause I'm curious. Cause I had heard the likely hood of, well honestly pretty much everything that's happened since the election was held a great many times going as far back as at least september.
As wild as 2020 has been, the actual election itself has been surprisingly consistent with expectations if your expectations were based on "mainstream" thinking. The only thing that was wrong is the polls indicated Biden would win by a landslide. And while he won, it wasn't a landslide and the results state by state didn't match the polls. Other than that though, trump refusing to concede, him initially being ahead only to ultimately lose and then using that fact to cast doubt on the whole process. All of it is stuff I've heard predicted what feels like most of the year.