so the myth that people just didn't know any better is plain wrong and manufactured to whitewash those horrendous crimes.
You may have misunderstood my words. I didn't say they didn't know better, but maybe you got that from my 'limited beliefs'. My point was that slavery was acceptable, until it wasn't. And the change wasn't a snap of Thanos' fingers. Social perception, and acceptance of norms, evolves.
Founding of the colonies = many came as indentured servants. Native Americans made slaves of other tribes, and the settlers dealt with the concept of slaves brought from Africa as slavery was common in the world. Slavery continues today in some regions of the world, I kid you not. And they don't seem bothered by it. There were likely persons going back centuries that abhorred it, but it existed and was generally accepted. Those same black slaves of the 1700s would have been amazed at the freedom of blacks in the 1900's following the emancipation proclamation, despite the
Black Codes. Blacks today, well ANYONE today, would be outraged to see citizens in slavery, or even how the blacks were treated in America following the emancipation. It took a change of social mindset on what is acceptable for women to get the right to vote in our country, and until the 1960's for blacks to achieve a lot of the civil rights they should have been granted. Do you think black from the 50s-60s would love the freedom they would have today? And yet, nearly all Americans today would be loathe to see any citizen treated the way blacks were up to that point. The slaves from the 1700's couldn't imagine having it as good as the blacks of the 50s-60s, as shitty as it was. All along throughout history, there has been a gradual shift of enlightenment occurring, a change of what is acceptable. It is my belief one must judge things in their environment, not by a parallel standard that shifts with time.
You say "it was known back then that owning slaves is inhumane" and I'll agree. But such a belief was held by only half the country, whilst the other half accepted the concept of slavery. You can't present it as slave owners were wrong in their minds, in their era. You can only make that judgement from the view of a non-slave owner of the time, or by today's standards.
Shall we look down upon the Egyptians for their pyramids, being they were made with slaves? Or do we continue to look upon the ingenuity and advanced science with admiration for what they accomplished? In my book, one must accept that both existed together, the good and the bad. What about the Roman Empire? Or the Greeks? Both had slaves, and I don't recall how tolerant Greeks were but Rome fed Christians to the lions - not real politically correct in today's light, but allowable at the time. And yet, despite both having slaves and doing some pretty bad things, they are looked upon as pillars of modern culture and society for their work with science, language, trade, the arts, and much more. Every society has an ugly history, and we are taught the good parts whilst the bad aspects tend to be whitewashed. I'm not saying this is proper, but it is reality. I'd agree with putting ALL of it in the spotlight, teaching future generation both the good AND the bad. History is a whole, not selected bits. And they need to be viewed within context of when they occurred.
What's happening now reminds me of the 1984 quote
Every book has been rewritten, every picture has been repainted, every statue and street and building has been renamed, every date has been altered...History has stopped. Nothing exists except an endless present in which the Party is always right.