w01fg4ng
Bluelighter
I really like this one.
I really like this one.
YouTube eventually posted a comment on Twitter explaining the decision. The statement said “We know that religious beliefs are personal, so we don’t allow advertisers to target users on the basis of religion. Beyond that, we don’t have policies against advertising that includes religious terms like “Christian””.
...
This only confused Chad Robichaux further as he tested out both the keywords ‘Christian’ and ‘Muslim‘.
In his testing Chad found YouTube had no issue with the word ‘Muslim’ being used but ‘Christian’ was a potential policy violation. Why would a word to describe the practitioners of the Christian faith trigger a possible policy violation while the word to describe those who practice Islamic beliefs be okay?
^Yeah cool, I literally laughed at loud then, but please no such debate here.
you probably didn't get the satire. I was mocking the people on this site who repeatedly call me a conspiracy theorist for posting factual information.I don't know if you can call a private company uphold a content policy on their platforms a conspiracy tbh. It is their right to do this.
oic
Orange Man Bad!!!!
![]()
Oh man, the 90s were awesome. Politics in music actually had substance to them, instead of this faux victim identity politics that pretty much everyone has fallen for these days. Most pretend they are sick of hearing about, yet these kinds of sales are making bank.The irony is it was from getting into RATM as a teenager I began to learn about all about The United States involvement in regime change in Latin America.
The members of that band are far from some idiots to say the least.