FYI: This has already gone way off track. My original two controversial statements were: Transgender people have a mental illness, and mental illness should not be normalized. And second, that public displays of sexuality are a manifestation of depravity and should be discouraged. That's my stance, attack that, and not make up stuff about hate, and implying that I disagreeing with fundamental human rights or understanding for trans people. That treacherous display is often seen spacejunk, and I resent that.
My point with this is, the arguments being used for normalizing behaviors that were once taboo, could potentially be argued for other paraphilias that are currently against the law. I would argue that there has to be a line drawn somewhere, and not inched further and further into accepting various paraphilias as acceptable and normal in society. I don't want groups like NAMBLA or the incest & necrophilia advocates to be covered under the same human rights protections as the LGBT folks are.
What is gross and abnormal to rest of society, is fine and acceptable in their eyes, much like how homosexuality and transgenders were before the 70s. However through years of public attention and normalization, these are now 'brave and heroic' individuals for stepping forth, getting tremendous coverage through the media - despite being a small population group.
I am not streatching its meaning. Trump supporters are a group, implying that they should go to the bin is derogatory. As are feminists, nazis, liberals, conservatives, racialists, and any other group you can think of. As long as hate isn't promoted on the boards, they should have their say, so that an informed discussion can happen on both sides, without resorting to fallacies, deception, and other malicious tricks.