• Current Events & Politics
    Welcome Guest
    Please read before posting:
    Forum Guidelines Bluelight Rules
  • Current Events & Politics Moderators: deficiT | tryptakid | Foreigner

Riots Break Out In Berkley Over Gay Libertarian Immigrant Speaker

Guys when you google "Australia nanny state" google gives you one of those bolded summaries before it gives you the links that says;
Australia – the land of rules and Regulations. However, when you visit Australia you need to be aware that Australia is a nanny state. ... A nanny state is basically where a government over regulates what its people can and cannot do.Apr 8, 2016

Australia is a Nanny State - Contented Traveller
www.contentedtraveller.com/australia-nanny-state/

Here's the full clip from the site:
However, when you visit Australia you need to be aware that Australia is a nanny state. Despite our laid back approach to life, we all live with more rules and regulations that many other countries. A nanny state is basically where a government over regulates what its people can and cannot do. Australia has so many rules and regulations that it has been difficult to fathom some of the reasoning behind them. Some I get, others are just for the sake of doing something.

Did you know in many Australian states it's even illegal to carry a concealed swiss army knife?

https://au.finance.yahoo.com/news/10-laws-that-suggest-australia-is-a-nanny-state-021525185.html

Only place in the world "lockouts" exist. I couldnt even fathom the concept tbh
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Droppers what has this got to do with the original topic of this thread?

I am just curious .

Troll is a troll.
 
alasdairm said:
"most things"? what a crock of absolute shit.

except the 14th amendment. that one can be changed because you don't like it. you just a hypocrite, droppers.

alasdair
Click to expand...
I said I would like it to be amended bc the 14th amendment is obsolete and harmful, in my opinion. Why do you keep editing my posts? Though I don't really see anything edited it says they are being edited below.
 
Prior to watching that Joe Rogan interview I was a pretty big fan, but it seems right after he did that video that he started becoming more and more gay to the point where he did a talk in drag.

Prior to that he seemed like a very smart regular guy to the point that sjw's thought his whole gay thing was a schtick.

But again he was the one that sounded the alarm many times and on TV about the left's normalization of pedophilia, you don't see pedophiles doing that ever.

He seems like he got really screwed up by gay sex predators and his own sexual behavior and I looked the other way, and I normally don't give people passes in that situation.

If liberals and gay rights morons really gave a crap about actually relieving tensions over homosexuals they would have kept their mouths shut. I normally would never listen to someone so flamboyantly gay, and he opened up my mind and made me accept them more as aresult and I feel many others have felt the same way.

They are utter morons and something tells me he will be bigger than ever as a result.
 
Droppersneck said:
I said I would like it to be amended bc the 14th amendment is obsolete and harmful, in my opinion. Why do you keep editing my posts? Though I don't really see anything edited it says they are being edited below.
Click to expand...

I agree with the sentiment but not the wording.

The 14th Amendment is not entirely obsolete but poorly written. Look into the Due Process clause for some of the important things in the amendment.

The Bill of Rights should be untouchable (no fucking rewrites), the 13th ammendment abolishing slavery is important, I'll have to look into the 11th amendment more deeply but based on my understanding it is damn good too (the Chinese want me arrested for criticizing Mao? Fuck off china.)

The 14th ammendment granting citizenship to people born on American soil was meant to apply to freed slaves. It was not written so criminal aliens could illegally enter our country and pop out bastard (ok some had married parents) children we had to pay to put in ESL classes.
 
Ryan01 said:
Until we hunt down and execute all gang members currently in our country, our gun violence levels won't change much. Mass shootings account for a fraction of gun deaths.
Click to expand...

Gun violence would probably go up with any federal crackdown once the criminals realized there was no reason not to go on home invasion sprees. (cue "It's the white males fault these people are killing entire families" unless it's a white man doing it then it's just "nazi home invasions on the rise")
 
Droppersneck said:
Guns are just the ultimate symbol of freedom.
Click to expand...

Who needs a symbol? A huge actual enactment of freedom is being able to live without fear of your children being suddenly gunned down by a lunatic. That's the sort of freedom I value. Its real and valuable to pretty much all people.

Freedom that is reliant on pieces of modern technology is a twisting of what freedom means.

Have you hear of The Social Contract?
 
No ones child is being gunned down a lunatic. It's all fake news, orchestrated by the democrats. Unless they are black, in which case its definetly real, we should hunt them down and kill them. This thread makes me sad.
 
David Wooderson said:
Prior to watching that Joe Rogan interview I was a pretty big fan, but it seems right after he did that video that he started becoming more and more gay to the point where he did a talk in drag..
Click to expand...

Is that not part of his 'act' though ? I get the impression Milo goes large simply to rub it in the faces of the left - it's funny but at the same time I feel it gives them something to argue about. The problem is that a lot of his message can be lost due to the act as people simply think he's another flamboyant fag.

It's the same thing as 'GAY pride' - it makes me cringe as it isn't a reflection on the gay society and simply enforces the misconceptions have about gays.
 
treezy z said:
I agree with the sentiment but not the wording.

The 14th Amendment is not entirely obsolete but poorly written. Look into the Due Process clause for some of the important things in the amendment.

The Bill of Rights should be untouchable (no fucking rewrites), the 13th ammendment abolishing slavery is important, I'll have to look into the 11th amendment more deeply but based on my understanding it is damn good too (the Chinese want me arrested for criticizing Mao? Fuck off china.)

The 14th ammendment granting citizenship to people born on American soil was meant to apply to freed slaves. It was not written so criminal aliens could illegally enter our country and pop out bastard (ok some had married parents) children we had to pay to put in ESL classes.
Click to expand...
I can agree with this. The Chinese have made a tourist business out of having their children here to gain citizenship. Putting liberals emotions aside, this is bigger than anchor babies. It is about national security and assuring our long term survival imho.
 
swilow said:
Who needs a symbol? A huge actual enactment of freedom is being able to live without fear of your children being suddenly gunned down by a lunatic. That's the sort of freedom I value. Its real and valuable to pretty much all people.

Freedom that is reliant on pieces of modern technology is a twisting of what freedom means.

Have you hear of The Social Contract?
Click to expand...
Lmao the social contract? So banning law abiding people from owning guns is gonna prevent mass shootings. Didn't work in France iirc.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Droppersneck said:
Lmao the social contract? So banning law abiding people from owning guns is gonna prevent mass shootings. Didn't work in France iirc. Logic over emotion needs to be used to formulate a sound opinion on this matter imo
Click to expand...
Well its worked here. Why do law abiding people need guns? We do fine without having a personal arsenal here. And before you say its in the constitution Droppers...you seem to only respect parts of the constitution that agrees with your views...you want other parts removed.

You should take up stand up comedy.
 
consumer said:
Well its worked here. Why do law abiding people need guns? We do fine without having a personal arsenal here. And before you say its in the constitution Droppers...you seem to only respect parts of the constitution that agrees with your views...you want other parts removed.

You should take up stand up comedy.
Click to expand...
You have some misconceptions about America. Not all Americans are the happy, smiling, laté sipping Malibu residents you might have seen on television. If all people were law-abiding, nobody would need guns for the purpose of protection. Sadly, not all Americans are law-abiding. Worse, some Americans will kill lone, unarmed people if they have the chance to do it without getting caught. In some parts of American, gun possession is necessary for personal safety. It's not a matter of "if" it happens but when it will happen if you are not prepared.
 
Exactly socko. Guns do their most good without even being fired. Home invasions don't happen in my neck of he woods, bc it would be suicide for a criminal to try in most households in Tennessee.
Didn't you say you were from oklalittledixie socko? That is as red as this country gets lol must be quite a departure, living in France. What do you miss most about America?
 
I dont see where i insulted you droppers...certainly no worse than you have said about me.

Anyway i still dont understand the need for guns. We dont need guns here...are we more law abiding? We dont have school massacres here...sorry but having a society full of people with guns and thinking its good is hill billy Duck Dynasty level thinking.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top