• Psychedelic Drugs Welcome Guest
    View threads about
    Posting RulesBluelight Rules
    PD's Best Threads Index
    Social ThreadSupport Bluelight
    Psychedelic Beginner's FAQ
  • PD Moderators: Esperighanto | JackARoe | Cheshire_Kat

☮ Social ☮ [PD Social General Talk Thread] Observation Tank for Fractallized Redundancy Modules

Status
Not open for further replies.
You don't say... I thought pihkal and tihkal compounds were a fuckload to catch up on... imagine being a total noob slowly, progressively, surely getting immersed in this world of available drugs. Lots more homework to do, makes self-education via internet increasingly more important to avoid making foolish mistakes. Although in theory the 'rules' of best practise always remain the same, in actual practise even for very intelligent people it tends to involve a lot of trial and error. I really rather wouldn't imagine further about foolishness like eye-balling, pre-mixing and mislabeling or misrepresenting.. :\

One important thing is that people completely underestimate how their judgement will be influenced later on. Nobody signs up for a cigarette addiction and life expectancy cut short... you try it, and stop if its enough cause that is how you managed it with other things, right? Wrong.. Becoming truly conscious of what it means to have your willpower and motivations, as well as emotions thought and a lot of aspects of yourself hijacked or influenced as you continue trying drugs... that would be the real tool for prevention education.
 
Last edited:
I fear the mainstreaming of research arylcyclohexylamines, among other things, opioids going without saying...
 
That development is not really in its infancy anymore is it? I think fortunately it is somewhat limited by say the bad reputation of PCP and the alienating nature of pure dissociative action. Then again, MXE being so seemingly 'doable' at first really made quite a name for itself.
 
AFAIK there has been such a long Ket drought since things got fucked up over @ SE Asia, I do wonder what effect that's been having on dissociative use trends.

Hopefully there is some info I can access via DIMS (drug information monitoring system), perhaps they are keeping track of it. Or does taking a look at the forum say enough? Much less activity in K threads - though certainly they will always keep popping up - and other RCy stuff on the rise. I don't suppose ketamine is talked out? No such thing
 
well you should be happy SKL, the USA wants to ban... everything.

https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/114/hr3537
Is anyone surprised?

I don't really give a shit because I don't have a dog in the fight, as it were, but the scene was a lot better when it was hiding in plain sight, which is when I was still involved, when I returned, all this darknet bullshit, and if operators of any significant stature really believe that technology and INFOSEC is going to save them, well, enjoy your prison time. Drugs and drug trafficking have irrevocably changed but I suspect that we'll see some kind of reversion to the mean eventually. That's a good thing. When I first started doing drugs I could probably only name six of them. That was a more innocent time. And then eventually I learned about exotic drugs and the associated markets where geographically disparate midlevel operators can leverage various market inefficiencies and make good money through arbitrage, and knowledgeable end users can obtain interesting things. Opening up the scene to the unwashed masses ruined that which is the livelihood of a significant number of people, rather like legal pot out West has ruined the small local pot farmers. Call me a Luddite but fuck corporatization of drugs, on all levels, from Purdue to California pot to vertically integrated Mexican cartels to Ulbircht and beyond.

As far as legislative approaches to solving the (very significant, I see this daily at work at the hospital) social and public health problems associated with novel drugs (in particular, cannabinoids and cathinones), there is a very promising approach that is largely being ignored. Ban the advertising, ban the packaging, don't ban chemicals, but go after anything that is packaged for the end user that doesn't list the ingredients, end the "NFHC" charade, and ban anything sold OTC that isn't either approved or a resonably defined herbal supplement (the German approach to this would work well.)
 
Perhaps you were seen as a part of the "unwashed mass" at the time you were on those markets and what not.

At what point exactly was it small enough? Too big?

Yeah, the bigger drugs get, the more stupid people do stupid things. Also, he more smart people do smart things. Who knows what positive benefits can come about from psychedelic experiences gained by someone who wouldn't have access to quality drugs if not for the DNM?
 
yepyepwoah said:
Perhaps you were seen as a part of the "unwashed mass" at the time you were on those markets and what not.
Naturally. I had to play the "fake it till you make it" game. And I was pretty good at it. I gave everyone the impression that I was more connected than I was, and it worked. I probably would've made a great UCLE lol. But now people don't even have to put in that much effort. That's the bullshit.
Yeah, the bigger drugs get, the more stupid people do stupid things. Also, he more smart people do smart things. Who knows what positive benefits can come about from psychedelic experiences gained by someone who wouldn't have access to quality drugs if not for the DNM?
"Positive benefits" meaning random druggies getting high off of stuff they ordered from strangers off the Internet? Even if it's better quality gear and it emphatically is not consistently that ... yeah I don't think that outweighs the problems at all. Drugs were just fine if you knew what you were doing before all this nonsense came about. Now, if you don't know what you're doing, you can still access stuff that should only be accessed by people who know what they're doing. This is bad.
 
The proliferation of exotic drugs beyond rather selective circles is a very bad thing. See the social problems of cathinones and cannabinoids, and God knows what comes next. I don't know SONN and I don't know if he's responsible or what circles he moves in but leaving stuff around and unlabeled isn't a very good indicator nor is the choice of friends ... and then the guy rips off some other guy's methylone? Everybody just has weird drugs laying around? What kind of social circle is this? How old are these people? How much do they really know about what they're taking? I mean this shit is getting way too open and popular. It will end in disaster and is bad news for all involved. I used to have an epic collection of drugs but it wasn't laying around or for the use of casual acquaintances or shady friends, they wouldn't even know it existed.

Pandora's box is open, where's the hope at the bottom? Harm reduction, I suppose, but a great many evils are gone out in the world.

Kinda with Bagseed on this. I fail to see how it's SONN's fault beyond perhaps 'not learning his lesson' after the first instance of this thievery. Is it suggested that someone MUST label such things solely on the chance that a third party may illegally obtain possession of it and through their own complete and utter reckless stupidity proceed to ingest it?

Metaphorically speaking, by this logic if someone stole a high-powered vehicle and proceeded to lose control of it and take out pedestrians, it's the owners fault for not taking precautions well above and beyond necessary to ensure it couldn't be stolen, and further the motor dealership industry for facilitating the acquisition of said vehicle by the owner?

This logic can be stretched to a great many difference scenarios; many, many of which you'll find you're suddenly on the other side of the fence.
 
And the later cannabinoids (JWH-018 and -073 were pretty OK, the new stuff is terrible and I mean life- and sanity-threateningly dangerous, I could tell some clinical stories, the cathinones, the bomamines, these are fucking evil, and the end user has no business with them whatsoever. This is of course a lot about unethical vendors whether Chinese or stateside, but yeah, fuck the libertarian argument. I don't really care. I blame the Internet, or more specifically, the modern scene on Tor. Tor and the whole infrastructure is going to get pwnt in the near future I am pretty sure and there will be some quality Schadenfreude ensuing for some of us watching the results. Sure people will move to something else, who the hell knows, drones and abandoned oil rigs and GPS dead drops or some shit, but who really cares? Hopefully we can just restore some sanity to the drug world. Let's get back to the basics.

And how many people who like Chinese drugs are against globalization and sweatshops when it comes to, say, your clothes and kids toys laced with GBL or whatever? And the outsourcing of American jobs? I imagine quite a few. That would be rather hypocritical.
 
SKL said:
Let's get back to the basics.

I really don't think the fancy internet things I bought back in the day led me to more harm than when I stuck to the basics, like heroin and meth. Though I readily confess that I too am disturbed by the risks posed by the bomamines (their popularity being a part of what made me decide to step down from PD modship) and some synthetic cannabinoids, compared to their benign predecessors. I'm not going to complain about their existence though, when governments keep banning the next best option from whatever the ideal drugs of a given category are, we're bound to end up with a situation like this, and folks inclined toward this sorta thing have to make do with what they can get, or give up if the occupational hazards are too much for 'em.


It strikes my ears that what you're complaining about isn't really the changing of popular drugs or their places of purchase, but your own lost naiveté and optimism:

skl said:
When I first started doing drugs I could probably only name six of them. That was a more innocent time.
skl said:
solving the (very significant, I see this daily at work at the hospital) social and public health problems associated with novel drugs

It sounds like your perception of the old street drugs was colored by your personal experiences with them, the fond memories you have from your wide eyed youth or some such thing, while your views on the newer drugs are largely informed by your impersonal experiences with them in a medical setting. The old stuff was damned dangerous as well, and plenty of people manage to kill or damage themselves with them in various ways, and the bulk of people dealing with RCs manage to use those chemicals without doing any more harm to themselves than one would expect to see in the average drug user.

I don't mean to brush aside your whole argument by saying that. I came into drug use in the late 2000s, so I might be trying to judge a complaint that I don't have the personal experience to understand, but I think as a rule of thumb one should be skeptical of golden age thinking. Also, I don't romanticize dealers over vendors, or the clandestine mom-and-pop operation over larger producers. I guess I can respect it if you feel that things have gone shit and don't want to be a part of it, and I can respect people who are perfectly comfortable with the scene today. I'm too eremitic to really go in for any side on an issue of culture like this, it's relative to any given person, based off of the exact nature of their experiences and entanglements within the culture.
 
Last edited:
I found out about this the other day when I was watching TV (something i rarely do, but I had to catch the new Rick and Morty episode) and just about lost my shit when I saw this Lego commercial and heard the word Vortech. I guess I should have copyrighted the name?
 
At what point exactly was it small enough? Too big?

It was small enough when it was a genuine and pretty tight knit community, or several such communities, and too big when it started to resemble a late 90s Internet boom startup but with Tor and all that.

Thorns Have Roses said:
It sounds like your perception of the old street drugs was colored by your personal experiences with them, the fond memories you have from your wide eyed youth or some such thing,
maybe, I've mentioned fond memories of buying drugs in the parking lot of the Red Apple and my first experiences cold copping dope in the hood, and so forth, and yeah, a lot of this is nostalgia, like how much I enjoyed the good old fashioned outdoor green weed that we had back home and can't stand the bizarre neon colored genetically engineered shit from out west that is now ubiquitous in this market ... on the other hand also fond memories of getting drugs in the mail from people who I'd actually have a working and in some cases even social relationship with. trust and personal connections. now they are gone or at least receded into the background. this is another deleterious effect of inviting the custie, which destroyed the whole sense of community and wreaked havoc on a very fragile ecosystem.

But yeah we did a lot of fucked up and degenerate shit. It wasn't a Golden Age by any stretch of the imagination. All this shit lead me to a very bad place in the end.
while your views on the newer drugs are largely informed by your impersonal experiences with them in a medical setting.
Somewhat true but you'd have to see some of the stuff that I've seen in a medical setting ... strapping people down for hours on end, wrestling with them, putting them in locked rooms, and injecting them with so many i.m. neuroleptics and benzos every couple of hours until they start to develop abscesses ... still incredibly psychotic ... all this from synthetic cannabinoids, lasting much longer and much more psychotic and violent than you might imagine. Cathinones are in many cases worse. A lot of the time we don't even know what we're dealing with and since we're a publicly funded institution we don't have resources to test for specific exotic drugs on every patient that comes in like this, basically it's guesswork. I suspect NMDA activity of synthetic cannabinoids, plus the fact that they're full agonists instead of the partial agonists that are in proper weed. PCP and crack cocaine were/are notorious for this sort of thing but generally the wore off quicker and responded better to sedation.
The old stuff was damned dangerous as well, and plenty of people manage to kill or damage themselves with them in various ways,
Yes, but the newer stuff, particular the cathinones, cannabinoids, and NBOMes are I dare say objectively more dangerous than the Shulginalia, early SCs and the better cathinones, and so on. And the worse thing is that each analog-whoring derivative of these drugs is worse than the last until we scrape the bottom of the barrel.
and the bulk of people dealing with RCs manage to use those chemicals without doing any more harm to themselves than one would expect to see in the average drug user.
True of any drug users really. Although demography is important here. The bluelighting drug nerd type may be able to practice harm reduction, but as we've seen here many of us do profoundly stupid things with both traditional and nontraditional recreational drugs. But now with unknown things being sold in foil packets to random people including my patients who are mostly psychotic and homeless, that's a totally different ball game. And again, the fault of the Internet and the opening up of the scene. Probably an inevitability but a damn shame.
I don't mean to brush aside your whole argument by saying that. I came into drug use in the late 2000s, so I might be trying to judge a complaint that I don't have the personal experience to understand, but I think as a rule of thumb one should be skeptical of golden age thinking.
I don't think that late 90s/early 00s was a golden age of any kind, there was a lot of silliness back then, mainly born of ignorance because we didn't have educational resources like this site that we have today, but on the other hand, we didn't have sites like this and maybe it was a good thing because as much as we preach harm reduction all the exposure to drugs and people's degenerate behaviour with drugs tends to give a false sense of security and get us deeper in. This is necessarily a trade off and I do believe in harm reduction, but some of the stuff you see on forums, including this one, is a little much.
Also, I don't romanticize dealers over vendors, or the clandestine mom-and-pop operation over larger producers.
A vendor is just a dealer with an email address and without a personal relationship with his user base. This isn't a plus. Now, vendors on the bulk side of things, vending to dealers (in the more traditional sense) with whom they've established some sort of relationship, is another matter, but vending to the end user is bad news for all involved. Regardless doing business with somebody without any sort of personal relationship to feel each other out is fucking insane. A lot of people will be winding up in prison and a lot of end users will get themselves into trouble. Even more so when we're talking about branded products instead of proper drugs. Things just went too far, with branded SC/bK products, mephedrone, etc. although mephedrone had potential as a proper "street" level drug and was (still is?) for a time in the UK. Weird psychedelic esoterica has no business being in the hands of people who don't know what they're doing. Weird stimulants have a tendency to end in disaster (read the 3-FMP thread...)
I guess I can respect it if you feel that things have gone shit and don't want to be a part of it, and I can respect people who are perfectly comfortable with the scene today. I'm too eremitic to really go in for any side on an issue of culture like this, it's relative to any given person, based off of the exact nature of their experiences and entanglements within the culture.
Right, but I'm not just waxing nostalgic about my former participation in the culture, I'm on about the social and public health consequences of the current scene, and also the economic effects of the whole thing going corporate on people who made their living off all this. This Silicon Valley techno-libertarian "disruption" shit, Uber and the taxis, airbnb and the hotels, outsourcing all sorts of jobs to Southeast Asia or Mexico or wherever (where, nota bene, quality tends to drop off...) This shit hurts real people, on all levels of the scene.
 
Last edited:
Heh, I never really trusted street drug type situations and would probably feel very paranoid and vulnerable in say NYC, but here in my town I recently just approached some potheads in my neighborhood in a really chilled out way and bought a little + got a contact which I have not followed up on. (instead I got a weed refill at a hashbar as they call it in Pulp Fiction - here we confusingly enough call them coffeeshops... in the centre city of the netherlands - the place that basically banished me in terms of housing availability (I have to bide my time 0-1-2 yrs....)

A whole other thing: a (nearly?) blind BL user approached me fumbling with the functions, he cannot really use the forum so I sent an e-mail upon his request that I will relay for this guy... anything he has to share, apparently on the topic of eliminating (he wrote illuminating, but probably a speech-interpretation program error) drug tolerance and on the topic of depression. :)

lol @ vortech .... "lego dimensions" is that the psychedelic department then? "lord vortech, favorite color = ???" lolwtf

@ the depressing issue of drug trends and culture / globalisation, I wonder if it's decadent to just suppose that it was basically inevitable that the genie got out of the bottle, all kinds of weird shit got out of the lab that is meant as probes etc. And now we have to deal with that shit, constantly mutating even...

How freaky can this get?
 
SKL said:
Somewhat true but you'd have to see some of the stuff that I've seen in a medical setting ... strapping people down for hours on end, wrestling with them, putting them in locked rooms, and injecting them with so many i.m. neuroleptics and benzos every couple of hours until they start to develop abscesses ... still incredibly psychotic ... all this from synthetic cannabinoids, lasting much longer and much more psychotic and violent than you might imagine. Cathinones are in many cases worse. A lot of the time we don't even know what we're dealing with and since we're a publicly funded institution we don't have resources to test for specific exotic drugs on every patient that comes in like this, basically it's guesswork. I suspect NMDA activity of synthetic cannabinoids, plus the fact that they're full agonists instead of the partial agonists that are in proper weed. PCP and crack cocaine were/are notorious for this sort of thing but generally the wore off quicker and responded better to sedation.

I agree that there are some dangerous new drugs out there, particularly some cathinones due to cardiovascular effects and NBOMe series for seizure risk. That said, these are still a tiny piece of the pie. It's the classic drugs that are responsible for >95% of drug-related emergencies. I work in a major metropolitan psychiatric ER (also publicly funded) and we often test for cathinones and synthetic cannabinoids (sent off for GC-MS) in addition to the usual stuff. I'd estimate out of 100 intoxicated, psychotic/agitated/delirious drug users that get brought in, 90-95 of them are using meth, crack, or alcohol (or some combination thereof), 2-3 are using cathinones, 2 are using PCP, 1 synthetic cannabinoid (as the primary drug), 1 GHB, and 1 a psychedelic drug. Heroin users don't tend to come in agitated (obviously), but they make up a decent portion of drug-related emergencies and deaths. Also, in my experience, the cathinone and cannabinoid users are no more psychotic, agitated, or more difficult to sedate than the meth/crack/PCP users.

I think we can agree that none of the above are good choices for multi-day heavy drug binges nor should they be available at your nearest convenience store.
 
Heh, I never really trusted street drug type situations and would probably feel very paranoid and vulnerable in say NYC, but here in my town I recently just approached some potheads in my neighborhood in a really chilled out way and bought a little + got a contact which I have not followed up on. (instead I got a weed refill at a hashbar as they call it in Pulp Fiction - here we confusingly enough call them coffeeshops... in the centre city of the netherlands - the place that basically banished me in terms of housing availability (I have to bide my time 0-1-2 yrs....)

A whole other thing: a (nearly?) blind BL user approached me fumbling with the functions, he cannot really use the forum so I sent an e-mail upon his request that I will relay for this guy... anything he has to share, apparently on the topic of eliminating (he wrote illuminating, but probably a speech-interpretation program error) drug tolerance and on the topic of depression. :)

lol @ vortech .... "lego dimensions" is that the psychedelic department then? "lord vortech, favorite color = ???" lolwtf

@ the depressing issue of drug trends and culture / globalisation, I wonder if it's decadent to just suppose that it was basically inevitable that the genie got out of the bottle, all kinds of weird shit got out of the lab that is meant as probes etc. And now we have to deal with that shit, constantly mutating even...

How freaky can this get?

I wonder about that, too. I figure it's too good to be true if these RCs and NPSs don't have a bunch of dangerous side effects--just don't know what they all are.

That sounds really interesting about what that other BL has to share.

Any of you combine ETH-LAD with AL-LAD?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top