MyDoorsAreOpen
Bluelight Crew
- Joined
- Aug 20, 2003
- Messages
- 8,542
I was inspired to make this thread by thinking deeply about Ninae's thread and the question in its subject line about incarnated angels. I decided to make this a separate thread, though, because I felt I was taking the question in a different direction than that thread has taken. That said, I wouldn't be opposed to having this thread merged with Ninae's if the mods see fit.
An angel is, in essence, a messenger. The word angel is derived from a Greek word which is a translation from the Semitic languages, which all simply mean 'messenger'. I haven't done my homework on this, but I have a strong feeling the winged good-looking ghosts we Westerners think of when we hear the word 'angel' are largely vestiges of an indigenous European animist belief system that long predates the arrival of Abrahamic religions to Europe. Similar to how Andean natives were able to accept the Virgin Mary by conflating her with Mama Pacha.
I remember Dan Brown writing in one of his novels that the Greco-Roman pagan image of an angel was a bird. I can picture people in ancient times seeing the fearless landing of a bird near them as a sign from the gods. Also, the practice of tying message scrolls to the feet of birds was, along with smoke signals, fire crackers, drums, and horns, one of the earliest (albeit unreliable) methods of communicating [relatively] quickly over long distances. If it would cross someone's mind to write "Arm yourselves, the barbarians from the East are storming our city gates, and your city may be next!" and tying it to the leg of a pigeon and send it flying westward, then no doubt it would cross someone's mind to send a pigeon off to Mount Olympus with a prayer or entreaty to the gods, or to look for a message from the gods on the leg of a curiously friendly pigeon who alighted on one's shoulder at seemingly just the right moment. All of these are acts of utter desperation, of course. I say this with not the slightest hint of disdain; this is a topic for another thread, but I think that desperation and the words and deeds it begets have much to teach us about The Human Condition. In other words, what we do and say and think when we're completely desperate reveals a ton about what it is we yearn for our whole lives, and are seldom consciously aware of.
With that in mind, my idea of angels is connected very strongly to my ideas about (and a few truly uncanny experiences with) synchronicity. I've had some experiences that have made me wonder whether sometimes the Prime Mover arranges for certain people, animals, or even nonliving objects to cross my path briefly and do or say something noticeable, which gets me motivated in a certain direction. If this is how it works, then any sentient (or "incarnated", as Ninae put it) being can potentially play the role of an angel to another, probably without even being aware of it. Why not aware of it? Well, scholars from the Abrahamic faiths have typically described angels as having no free will, as being essentially tools in the hands of the Master Builder. Therefore, I theorize that the subjective experience of playing the role of an angel feels less like deliberately going out into the world with the conscious aim of doing good for people (which is an act of the Will), and more like having a sudden inexplicable urge to spontaneously say or do some small thing for someone, before thinking nothing of it and slipping back into one's mundane roles, largely ignorant of how powerful and influential a message the recipient got from the deed.
Any thoughts?
An angel is, in essence, a messenger. The word angel is derived from a Greek word which is a translation from the Semitic languages, which all simply mean 'messenger'. I haven't done my homework on this, but I have a strong feeling the winged good-looking ghosts we Westerners think of when we hear the word 'angel' are largely vestiges of an indigenous European animist belief system that long predates the arrival of Abrahamic religions to Europe. Similar to how Andean natives were able to accept the Virgin Mary by conflating her with Mama Pacha.
I remember Dan Brown writing in one of his novels that the Greco-Roman pagan image of an angel was a bird. I can picture people in ancient times seeing the fearless landing of a bird near them as a sign from the gods. Also, the practice of tying message scrolls to the feet of birds was, along with smoke signals, fire crackers, drums, and horns, one of the earliest (albeit unreliable) methods of communicating [relatively] quickly over long distances. If it would cross someone's mind to write "Arm yourselves, the barbarians from the East are storming our city gates, and your city may be next!" and tying it to the leg of a pigeon and send it flying westward, then no doubt it would cross someone's mind to send a pigeon off to Mount Olympus with a prayer or entreaty to the gods, or to look for a message from the gods on the leg of a curiously friendly pigeon who alighted on one's shoulder at seemingly just the right moment. All of these are acts of utter desperation, of course. I say this with not the slightest hint of disdain; this is a topic for another thread, but I think that desperation and the words and deeds it begets have much to teach us about The Human Condition. In other words, what we do and say and think when we're completely desperate reveals a ton about what it is we yearn for our whole lives, and are seldom consciously aware of.
With that in mind, my idea of angels is connected very strongly to my ideas about (and a few truly uncanny experiences with) synchronicity. I've had some experiences that have made me wonder whether sometimes the Prime Mover arranges for certain people, animals, or even nonliving objects to cross my path briefly and do or say something noticeable, which gets me motivated in a certain direction. If this is how it works, then any sentient (or "incarnated", as Ninae put it) being can potentially play the role of an angel to another, probably without even being aware of it. Why not aware of it? Well, scholars from the Abrahamic faiths have typically described angels as having no free will, as being essentially tools in the hands of the Master Builder. Therefore, I theorize that the subjective experience of playing the role of an angel feels less like deliberately going out into the world with the conscious aim of doing good for people (which is an act of the Will), and more like having a sudden inexplicable urge to spontaneously say or do some small thing for someone, before thinking nothing of it and slipping back into one's mundane roles, largely ignorant of how powerful and influential a message the recipient got from the deed.
Any thoughts?
