ALTERNATIVE THEORIES V: The Build-a-bear Workshop

[rickolasnice]

A conspiracy that is real..

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=qQzz-TpRfC4

Revolution, anyone?

 

[Jabberwocky]

that's not a conspiracy, it's a video 'mix-tape' on a pretty wide range of topics. 7/10 rage-boner tho, will give it that.
/I'd expect the actual anonymous channel to have higher-quality stuff than the 2nd one I clicked, from 3wks ago, that was claiming members of anonymous were being kidnapped by the illuminati

 

[rickolasnice]

Yeah the "Anonymous" youtubers are blatently a bunch of guys ( / gals /singular guy / gal) that have jumped on the band wagon..

But it IS a conspiracy:

a secret plan by a group to do something unlawful or harmful.
"a conspiracy to destroy the government"
synonyms: plot, scheme, stratagem, plan, machination, cabal; More#
the action of plotting or conspiring.
"they were cleared of conspiracy to pervert the course of justice"

Although to be fair I can't remember the content of the video (apart from Obama saying the same shit and America becoming a police state).. So I admit I may be wrong

 

[rickolasnice]

http://documentaryheaven.com/all-wars-are-bankers-wars/

http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/allwarsarebankerwars.php

Video and then the text of a radio rant about the banking system controlling everything..

"Banking was conceived in iniquity and was born in sin. The Bankers own the Earth. Take it away from them, but leave them the power to create deposits, and with the flick of a pen they will create enough deposits to buy it back again. However, take it away from them, and all the fortunes like mine will disappear, and they ought to disappear, for this world would be a happier and better world to live in. But if you wish to remain slaves of the Bankers and pay for the cost of your own slavery, let them continue to create deposits." -- Sir Josiah Stamp, President of the Bank of England in the 1920s, the second richest man in Britain

(Well worth a watch / listen)

Edit - Listening again he says something about global warming by man being crap (only a sentence or two).. minus 2 respect points.

 

[-Guido-]

Although, to be fair, you should probably have attributed the bits you didn't write to the author that did... Just sayin'

https://www.google.com.au/search?q=...ntu-browser&sourceid=chrome&es_sm=93&ie=UTF-8

He sold the rights to his writing for a nickel bag of dope. Fuck him lol.

 

[-Guido-]

members of anonymous were being kidnapped by the illuminati

Which is leetspeak for basement dwelling neck-beards being grounded from the internet by their parents.

 

[Jabberwocky]

actually lol'd

 

[bit_pattern]

He sold the rights to his writing for a nickel bag of dope. Fuck him lol.

And for your further amusement

 

[rickolasnice]

In reply to legalizeall's post:

I was using that as an example to show what the govt is capable of. Not tryin to open up a discussion there.

But just quickly...planes did not bring down the towers unless maybe the laws of physics forgot to get up that morning. There are many facts, not opinions or what ifs, to prove that they did fall at that speed using very basic instruments along with many other situations that prove that their needs to be some answered questions. For example, a stopwatch and a video which prove they did fall at free fall speed and actually tower 7, which was hardly damaged at all, actually gained speed on the way down. so your statement is quite false and rather nieve.

Next time maybe just tell me where the thread is cause i didnt know there was a conspiracy thread. But "quickly" putting in some opinions you have is just gonna invite me to say something as well and that was not my intention.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qLShZOvxVe4

 

[Jabberwocky]

it's pretty weak to just bump this thread w/ a yotuube link w/o any context
//his link is some 9/11 'free fall speed' conspiracy vid, so others don't have to click to find what he meant

 

[rickolasnice]

It was actually a reply to another user to carry on from another thread (Who's pulling the strings?) but true say.. fair enough.. Apologies.

Admittedly it's a poor rebuttal.. but I had just got home and couldn't be fucked to find anything better.. still can't

Maybe later.. it is Friday.

 

[Jabberwocky]

you know you're getting old when you realize it's 9pm friday and you were wholly unaware of, and do not give a fuck, that it is..

 

[rickolasnice]

Yup :/

Although i did actually go out last night.. rare thing these days..

 

[GodandLove]

Executive order 11110....What do you "alternative theorists"...think about the Kennedy assassination?

Was it personal.....or just business?

Also...what do you guys think about the "homosexual" agenda?

Is it personal...or just hot sex?


I personally do not believe in defining sexuality...drop the hetro and the homo....what do you have....sexuality....MMMMMM BABY!

Also.... was God in on 9-11?

 

[spacejunk]

Also...what do you guys think about the "homosexual" agenda?

Is it personal...or just hot sex?


I personally do not believe in defining sexuality...drop the hetro and the homo....what do you have....sexuality....MMMMMM BABY!

Also.... was God in on 9-11?

What "homosexual agenda"?

As for "was God in on 9-11?" - do you mean was it carried out by religious fundamentalists?
...or was "god" complicit? if the latter - it depends entirely upon what you believe.
There is very little to be gained in trying to argue a case for or against the existence of an interventionist god, as it cannot be proven either way.

God didnt kill Kennedy, guns (or...a gun) killed Kennedy.

 

[GodandLove]

What "homosexual agenda"?

Exactly.

 

[spacejunk]

...hmmm?

 

[Jabberwocky]

'homosexual agenda' =? REALLY, spjunk?? C'mon that's common vernacular no?

I personally do not believe in defining sexuality...drop the hetro and the homo....what do you have....sexuality....MMMMMM BABY!

why don't you 'believe' in defining such a broad phenomena? I'll agree, sexuality (can) = 'MMMMM BABY', but as someone who finds bi/gay to be 'meh' at best and hetero to be tops, and is fascinated by such stuff, I suggest you get over your silly 'don't believe in defining it' mindset and get on to defining it. Whether you're trying to learn about sex in general, or yourself wrt sex / sexuality, defining it is the 1st step in understanding the broader ideas involved and, as such, is foolish not to pursue if you give a damn (which most red-blooded folk do)

edit to add: note that the last paragraph isn't only relevant to gay/straight dichotomies, but to 100% hetero/gay relationships as well, I mean even in a man/woman relationship there is such a treasure trove of psychologic:attraction criteria/norms that you cannot help but be enthralled for a while learning them.

 

[GodandLove]

'homosexual agenda' =? REALLY, spjunk?? C'mon that's common vernacular no?




why don't you 'believe' in defining such a broad phenomena? I'll agree, sexuality (can) = 'MMMMM BABY', but as someone who finds bi/gay to be 'meh' at best and hetero to be tops, and is fascinated by such stuff, I suggest you get over your silly 'don't believe in defining it' mindset and get on to defining it. Whether you're trying to learn about sex in general, or yourself wrt sex / sexuality, defining it is the 1st step in understanding the broader ideas involved and, as such, is foolish not to pursue if you give a damn (which most red-blooded folk do)

edit to add: note that the last paragraph isn't only relevant to gay/straight dichotomies, but to 100% hetero/gay relationships as well, I mean even in a man/woman relationship there is such a treasure trove of psychologic:attraction criteria/norms that you cannot help but be enthralled for a while learning them.

Broader Ideas involved?....You mean like 4 play?

I don't believe in defining sexuality because.....drum roll.....there is no such thing as hetero or homosexuality...I know this may come as a shock to some of you....but you have to understand the human mind can be conditioned to LOVE or want to have sex with ANY thing uh. PERIOD

The human mind is similar to a computer hard drive...you can upload,delete or rewrite data as you see fit.

 

[Jabberwocky]

Broader Ideas involved?....You mean like 4 play?

No, I do not. I mean things such as the distnction between 'love' and 'lust', I mean the reasons you find a particular type of 1-nighter, or a particular type of long-term, to be preferable, I mean what most everything about your sexual desires say about your psyche.

I don't believe in defining sexuality because.....drum roll.....there is no such thing as hetero or homosexuality

You realize your drum-roll just served as setup to make you look dumb, eh? W/O even bothering to google to copypasta definitions, there is absolutely a difference between heterosex (prefer opposing gender) and homosex (prefer same gender) preferences in terms of sexual desires. I imagine your post was almost hyperbolic to prove a point (perhaps your original point, ie 'drop homo- and hetero-, you're left w/ just sex), but that original point was reductionist to the point of moronic, and if this sentence is just meant to emphasize it, then plz just be quiet w/ your infantile conflations between homo/hetero cuz they're not noteworthy to anyone at such a point.

...I know this may come as a shock to some of you....but you have to understand the human mind can be conditioned to LOVE or want to have sex with ANY thing uh. PERIOD

Yes, ppl can be conditioned to most-anything.. wtf does that have to do w/ free choices in sexual partners? If you're gonna throw some oblique societal rant, plz be specific in what you mean to convey.

The human mind is similar to a computer hard drive...you can upload,delete or rewrite data as you see fit.

Is this nugget of wisdom meant as anything relevant, or just kinda as a 'proof' on your past quote in regards to 'minds can be conditioned'?

Am seein a lot of herp, but not enough derp.. I do await a more thought-out reply, am actually holding my breath.