• Current Events & Politics
    Welcome Guest
    Please read before posting:
    Forum Guidelines Bluelight Rules
  • Current Events & Politics Moderators: deficiT | tryptakid | Foreigner

ALTERNATIVE THEORIES V: The Build-a-bear Workshop

Wait did you say GMO food and minute amounts of medication found in water supplies causes autism?

Autism is genetic brah.
 
capstone said:
The DNA of the human species as we know it today was tampered with a very long time ago, 20,000 years minimum. From my research, there appears to be many extraterrestrial civilizations with a vested interest in this planet.
Click to expand...

The bolded bit couldn't be funnier =D

ancient-aliens-it-was-aliens.jpg
 
Naw we know capstone is crazy but my post was aimed at Guido ;)

And i literally just posted that meme to someone on facebook :\ .. Aliens.

Am I the only one that would welcome mass sterilization? To quote a character from a very good conspiracy program; Utopia http://watchseries.lt/serie/Utopia

“We are now past 7 billion on this planet. When I was born it was a little over two. Food prices are rising, oil is ending, when our resources end in 20 years, given everything we know of our species, do you really think we’re going to just, share? Janus affects 90 to 90% of the human population, leaving only one in 20 fertile. We predict the population will plateau at 500 million in just over 100 years. By then, normal breeding rates should resume, but on a planet that will feel… empty.”

“You’re fucking insane.”

“You accuse us of being genocidal. Not acting is genocidal. 1/3 of the world’s farmland is now useless due to soil deprivation, and we keep producing more mouths to feed. What’s your solution to that, energy efficient light bulbs? Not to do something is to condemn billions of people to starvation and misery.”
Click to expand...

But adding: We are choking planet earth. Our deforestation, our over-farming the seas, our farming the land to the point of zero nutrition, our pollution, etc is literally killing our planet..

Think of the aminals!
 
Last edited:
-Guido- said:
By the way, the mercury-based preservative found in early vaccines hasn't been used in decades and even then it was found not to cause any issues but was removed anyways due to more effective preservatives being discovered. Also vaccines these days don't contain a weakened or live virus or bacteria, they contain one that is dead or inactivated.
Click to expand...


This is not exactly true. 11/54 vaccines available in the U.S are live vaccines. And thimerosal is still in a few vaccines, only the pediatric ones ( except for some influenza vaccines) have removed it. Still a proponent of vaccination, however.
 
squidhead said:
I've often wondered why the CIA (or the dudes in the black suits & sunglasses) confiscated every security-camera's tape that was in the vicinity of the Pentagon on 9/11.
Click to expand...

Um, as evidence? All the security footage has since been released. You'd fully expect an investigation to start by getting as much surveillance footage as possible. It's hardly the stuff of conspiracy

Also, if a jetliner crashed into the Pentagon, why was the area of impact the size of a missile ?
Click to expand...

Well, that's just too easy - simply put, it wasn't:

http://11-settembre.blogspot.com.au/2008/05/why-pentagon-damage-is-incompatible.html



So many questions...so little intelligence. 8(
Click to expand...

Indeed =D
 
Last edited:
rickolasnice said:
Yeah.. that hole in the pentagon not being in line with what a plane hitting it is bullshit..
Click to expand...

The "hole in the Pentagon" was the size of a missile...not the size of a jumbo jet. I saw the size of where the jet supposedly hit & no way was that a jet. You won't convince me by just calling "bullshit".8)

You expect me to believe a YouTube film that is probably distributed by the government? You're probably a federal employee.
 
Last edited:
lol..

Yeah.. I work for the government.. You make a compelling argument.

I didn't post a youtube video.. I posted a link to where we discussed this topic earlier in the thread.. I've covered it many times and no I'm not going to go over it again..

No the hole is not consistent with what a missile would do. Yeah it is consistent of what a jet hitting a concrete building would do. There was plane wreckage everywhere. Almost all witnesses saw a plane (not a missile).

Where a bomber hit the empire state building:
empirestatebldgcrash.jpg


Plane wreckage from the pentagon:
https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=p...fHKze7Aazx4DYBg&ved=0CC0QsAQ&biw=1360&bih=643

Eye witness accounts:
http://911research.wtc7.net/pentagon/analysis/witnesses.html

Missiles don't do this:
pentagon_precollapse-marked.jpg


etc etc
 
Last edited:
squidhead said:
The "hole in the Pentagon" was the size of a missile...not the size of a jumbo jet.
Click to expand...

Exactly how large is "the size of a missile" and exactly how large is "the size of a jumbo jet"? Keeping in mind that there are different sizes of ordinance attached to missiles and different velocities in which planes can travel.

Here's one missile crater, for instance:

NSFW:
755px-Sedan_Plowshare_Crater.jpg
 
You gonna bother reading the links or are you just gonna sit their spouting idiotic bull?

about 89 The amount of eye witnesses I gathered who stated they saw an object crash into the Pentagon. The vast majority of the still available ones.
at least 45 The amount of eye witnesses who reported seeing a plane and described it with words like: 'airliner', 'big', 'silver', 'roaring', etc.
at least 23 The amount of eye witnesses who specifically said they saw an American Airlines jet. In all cases a large jet.
at least 22 The amount of witnesses who reported the noise of the plane was very loud to deafening.
at least 17 The amount of eye witnesses who stated they saw a plane running down light poles when crossing the highways.
at least 12 The amount of eye witnesses who stated they saw and heard the plane increase its throttle at the last seconds.
at least 11 The amount of eye witnesses who stated they saw a C-130H flying 30 seconds behind a jetliner.
at least 5 The amount of eye witnesses who specifically stated they saw the plane had its gear up.
at least 2 The amount of eye witnesses who stated that they saw a small corporate jet, without doing any creative interpretating [sic] of the witness accounts.
at least 0 The amount of eye witnesses who stated they saw a missile. What the person thought he heard isn't relevant!
at least 0 The amount of eye witnesses who stated they saw a military jet fighter at the time of the crash.
at least 0 The amount of eye witnesses who stated they saw a Global Hawk at the time of the crash.
at least 3 The amount of witnesses who reported the sound of the plane was quite noiseless. (One of them acknowledged it was the shock)
at least 1 The amount of eye witnesses who stated they saw the plane had it's gear down. (Indirect, said a wheel hit a pole)
at least 25 The amount of witnesses who have said something that might point to the use of explosives or incendiaries. (White flash, powerful blast waves which blew people through the air, molten glass, burning aluminium, [sic] spreading debris over hundreds of yards back to where the plane came from, including 2 engines, the missing plane itself, etc.)

Where is the missing plane, the crew and it's passengers? You think the government can make them disappear, transport debris from a plane wreck (from an exact copy of the plane) to the pentagon (inside and out), make it look consistent with a plane crash, all within view of many witnesses (including many firemen), within minutes of the explosion and fake recordings from passengers without having the power to fly a plane into a building?

Stop reading myths to confirm you're beliefs and start reading facts that prove your beliefs to be based on crap..

http://www.911myths.com/html/pentagon.html
http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military/news/debunking-911-myths-pentagon
 
Last edited:
^ Well which is it? A missile or demolition explosives..? Because the pentagon was not "demolished", and we WATCHED a plane hit the second WTC


It's pretty damn easy for them to get either, or both, IMO.. but why would they choose a missile that would undoubtedly raise questions when a plane filled with explosives would be able to accomplish the same mission? It's these kind of fake "theories" that distract from the ACTUAL truth behind 9/11 however... which we will never really know considering so much misinformation is spread on a daily basis.
 
Yes it did... Remember the hole... Then the collapse...

Missile for the big boom, then planted explosives for the takedown...

Planes may or may not have been involved... Wheres the wrecked plane parts?
 
"Missiles may or may not have been involved.. where's the wrecked missile parts?"

:p


It would be VERY hard for them to try and blame Iraq/Afghanistan for a missile attack on the Pentagon. It makes no sense especially considering we have records of planes being hijacked. Those airliners had to go somewhere... the side of a building seems a good guess to me, considering there's a large amount of evidence to back that up and only a few youtube videos say it was a "missile"

It wouldn't surprise me if there were secondary explosives in the buildings, but why would they need a MISSILE when they already had explosives set?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top