• SPORTS
    AND
    GAMING
  • Sports & Gaming Moderators: ghostfreak

USADA to ban Armstrong for life, strip Tour titles

boardsofcanada

Bluelighter
Joined
Aug 24, 2010
Messages
118
With stunning swiftness, the U.S. Anti-Doping Agency said Thursday night it will strip Lance Armstrong of his unprecedented seven Tour de France titles after he dropped his fight against drug charges that threatened his legacy as one of the greatest cyclists of all time.

Travis Tygart, USADA's chief executive, said Armstrong would also be hit with a lifetime ban on Friday. And under the World Anti-Doping Code, he would lose the bronze medal from the 2000 Olympics as well as any awards, event titles and cash earnings.

Armstrong, who retired last year, effectively dropped his fight by declining to enter USADA's arbitration process — his last option — because he said he was weary of fighting accusations that have dogged him for years. He has consistently pointed to the hundreds of drug tests he passed as proof of his innocence while piling up Tour titles from 1999 to 2005.

''There comes a point in every man's life when he has to say, `Enough is enough.' For me, that time is now,'' Armstrong said. He called the USADA investigation an ''unconstitutional witch hunt.''

''I have been dealing with claims that I cheated and had an unfair advantage in winning my seven Tours since 1999,'' he said. ''The toll this has taken on my family and my work for our foundation and on me leads me to where I am today — finished with this nonsense.''

USADA reacted quickly and treated Armstrong's decision as an admission of guilt, hanging the label of drug cheat on an athlete who was a hero to thousands for overcoming life-threatening testicular cancer and for his foundation's support for cancer research.

''It is a sad day for all of us who love sport and athletes,'' Tygart said. ''It's a heartbreaking example of win at all costs overtaking the fair and safe option. There's no success in cheating to win.''

Tygart said the agency had the power to strip the Tour titles, though Armstrong disputed that.

''USADA cannot assert control of a professional international sport and attempt to strip my seven Tour de France titles,'' he said. ''I know who won those seven Tours, my teammates know who won those seven Tours, and everyone I competed against knows who won those seven Tours.''

Still to be heard from was the sport's governing body, the International Cycling Union, which had backed Armstrong's legal challenge to USADA's authority and in theory could take the case before the international Court of Arbitration for Sport.

Tygart said UCI was ''bound to recognize our decision and impose it'' as a signer of the World Anti-Doping Code.

''They have no choice but to strip the titles under the code,'' he said.

USADA maintains that Armstrong has used banned substances as far back as 1996, including the blood-booster EPO and steroids as well as blood transfusions — all to boost his performance.

The 40-year-old Armstrong walked away from the sport in 2011 without being charged following a two-year federal criminal investigation into many of the same accusations he faces from USADA.

The federal probe was closed in February, but USADA announced in June it had evidence Armstrong used banned substances and methods — and encouraged their use by teammates. The agency also said it had blood tests from 2009 and 2010 that were ''fully consistent'' with blood doping.

Included in USADA's evidence were emails written by Armstrong's former U.S. Postal Service teammate Floyd Landis, who was stripped of his 2006 Tour de France title after a positive drug test. Landis' emails to a USA Cycling official detailed allegations of a complex doping program on the team.

USADA also said it had 10 former Armstrong teammates ready to testify against him. Other than suggesting they include Landis and Tyler Hamilton, both of whom have admitted to doping offenses, the agency has refused to say who they are or specifically what they would say.

''There is zero physical evidence to support (the) outlandish and heinous claims,'' Armstrong said. ''The only physical evidence here is the hundreds of (doping) controls I have passed with flying colors.''

Armstrong sued USADA in Austin, where he lives, in an attempt to block the case and was supported by the UCI. A judge threw out the case on Monday, siding with USADA despite questioning the agency's pursuit of Armstrong in his retirement.

''USADA's conduct raises serious questions about whether its real interest in charging Armstrong is to combat doping, or if it is acting according to less noble motives,'' such as politics or publicity, U.S. District Judge Sam Sparks wrote.

Even if UCI and USADA differ on the Tour titles, the ultra-competitive Armstrong has still done something virtually unthinkable for him: He quit before a fight is over.

It was a stunning move for an athlete who built his reputation on not only beating cancer, but forcing himself through grueling offseason workouts no one else could match, then crushing his rivals in the Alps and the Pyrenees.

''Today I turn the page. I will no longer address this issue, regardless of the circumstances,'' he said. ''I will commit myself to the work I began before ever winning a single Tour de France title: serving people and families affected by cancer, especially those in underserved communities.''

Armstrong could have pressed his innocence in USADA's arbitration process, which would have included a hearing during which evidence against him would have been presented. But the cyclist has said he believes most people have already made up their minds about whether he's a fraud or a persecuted hero.

Although he had already been crowned a world champion and won individual stages at the Tour de France, Armstrong was still relatively unknown in the U.S. until he won the epic race for the first time in 1999. It was the ultimate comeback tale: When diagnosed with cancer, doctors had given him less than a 50 percent chance of survival before surgery and brutal cycles of chemotherapy saved his life.

Armstrong's riveting victories, his work for cancer awareness and his gossip-page romances with rocker Sheryl Crow, fashion designer Tory Burch and actress Kate Hudson made him a figure who transcended sports.

His dominance of the Tour de France elevated the sport's popularity in America to unprecedented levels. His story and success helped sell millions of the ''Livestrong'' plastic yellow wrist bracelets, and enabled him to enlist lawmakers and global policymakers to promote cancer awareness and research. His Lance Armstrong Foundation has raised nearly $500 million since its founding in 1997.

Jeffery C. Gervey, chairman of the foundation, issued a statement of support saying:

''Faced with a biased process whose outcome seems predetermined, Lance chose to put his family and his foundation first,'' Gervey said. ''The leadership of the Lance Armstrong Foundation remain incredibly proud of our founder's achievements, both on and off the bike.''

Created in 2000, USADA is recognized by Congress as the official anti-doping agency for Olympic sports in the United States. Its investigators joined U.S. agents during the federal investigation of Armstrong. Tygart dismissed Armstrong's lawsuit as an attempt at ''concealing the truth,'' saying the agency is motivated by one goal — exposing cheaters.

Armstrong had tense public disputes with USADA, the World Anti-Doping Agency, some former teammates and assistants and even Greg LeMond, the first American to win the Tour de France.

Others close to him were caught up in the investigations, too: Johan Bruyneel, the coach of Armstrong's teams, and three members of the medical staff and a consultant were also charged. Bruyneel is taking his case to arbitration, while two medical team staffers and consulting doctor Michele Ferrari didn't formally contest the charges and were issued lifetime ban by USADA. Ferrari later said he was innocent.


Questions surfaced even as Armstrong was on his way to his first Tour victory. He was leading the 1999 race when a trace amount of a banned anti-inflammatory corticosteroid was found in his urine; cycling officials said he was authorized to use a small amount of a cream to treat saddle sores.

After Armstrong's second victory in 2000, French judicial officials investigated his Postal Service team for drug use. That investigation ended with no charges, but the allegations kept coming.

Armstrong was criticized for his relationship with Ferrari, who was banned by Italian authorities over doping charges in 2002. Former personal and team assistants accused Armstrong of having steroids in an apartment in Spain and disposing of syringes that were used for injections.

In 2004, a Dallas-based promotions company initially refused to pay him a $5 million bonus for winning his sixth Tour de France because it wanted to investigate allegations raised by media in Europe. Testimony in that case included former teammate Frankie Andreu and his wife, Betsy, saying Armstrong told doctors during his 1996 cancer treatments that he had taken a cornucopia of steroids and performance-enhancing drugs.

Two books published in Europe, ''L.A. Confidential'' and ''L.A. Official,'' also raised doping allegations and, in 2005, French magazine L'Equipe reported that retested urine samples from the 1999 Tour showed EPO use.

Armstrong fought every accusation with denials and, in some cases, lawsuits against media outlets that reported them.

He retired in 2005 and almost immediately considered a comeback before deciding to stay on the sidelines — in part because he didn't want to keep answering doping questions.

''I'm sick of this,'' Armstrong said in 2005. ''Sitting here today, dealing with all this stuff again, knowing if I were to go back, there's no way I could get a fair shake — on the roadside, in doping control, or the labs.''

Three years later, Armstrong was 36 and itching to ride again. He came back to finish third in the 2009 Tour de France.

Armstrong raced again in 2010 under the cloud of the federal investigation. Early last year, he quit the sport for good, making a brief return as a triathlete until the USADA investigation shut him down.

During his sworn testimony in the dispute over the $5 million bonus, Armstrong said he wouldn't take drugs because he had too much to lose.

''(The) faith of all the cancer survivors around the world. Everything I do off the bike would go away, too,'' Armstrong said then. ''And don't think for a second I don't understand that. It's not about money for me. Everything. It's also about the faith that people have put in me over the years. So all of that would be erased.''

http://msn.foxsports.com/cycling/story/us-anti-doping-agency-will-ban-lance-armstrong-for-life-strip-tour-de-france-titles-082312
 
dude they all cheat, he just got caught / snitched out

if you dont think steroids are in every major competitive sport you are delusional

theres always going to be scientists / trainers who find workarounds to the drug tests

I mean, people on this website probably have worked around drug tests, why wouldnt someone whos career depended on it be able to?
 
Everyone cheated, why single out Lance?

He is an inspiration for people dealing with cancer and the USADA has no authority to strip his titles from an international competition. This whole thing is ridiculous, obviously he has some enemies in high places.

On another related topic, why are the authorities of professional sports so anti-PED? They say they are dangerous, but its not like we see athletes having any health problems because of their use. Its their decision to use them and it makes the sport more competitive. As long as we have a ban on PED's in major sports there will always be controversy about who is getting away with cheating. Currently in every major sport that requires endurance or strength, there are people using PEDs, you can count on it.

The one solid argument against PED's is that it makes it so you cant be a professional athlete without using them, but I dont really have a problem with that. Most PEDs arent even bad for you, people are just scared because of their bad reputation.
 
Last edited:
All the USADA did was make themselves look like they had an agenda against Lance. If all the teammates they had lined up against Lance are so dirty, why arent they getting penalized or did they get some form of plea deal so as not to get in trouble if they currently race? That fact makes the USADA look really bad by going after one and letting the others be silent.
 
^that's a bad take, saying someone sucks or is a dick is not a good take

dude was trying to kick cancer's ass, of course he took some shit

i really don't even care, and i doubt lance does, my opinion on the guy in indifferent, don't give a shit enough about the sport and pretty sure he's not the only one or the first to make a huge push at fighting cancer
 
Last edited:
Huge respect for the incredible things he's done with the LA Foundation but the time for defending Lance Armstrongs cycling has long passed. He was an incredible athlete and competitor, unbelievable physical conditioning, an inspiration for cancer sufferers, the reason I spent 1700 euros on a kickass bike many years ago but Lance was/is not a popular man among the Tour. Calling him a dick is putting it very lightly. He was cheating as much as everyone else if not more, he was a bully in his own teams, he fell out with half the peloton, and his sportsmanship left a lot to be desired.


Everyone cheated, why single out Lance?

Because he won the races. There isn't really much point in stripping Ulrich, Basso, Kloden, Vinokourov or whoever finished in runner up or 3rd place over the years. A lot of these guys(excluding Lance) have all served lengthy bans in the sport for admitting using EPO or whatever PEDs. It's a team sport and all these guys were culpable and Lance was leading the charge doped to the gylls. He made a lot of cash too. Nobody should awarded the titles. The sport has changed and has cleaned up a lot since 2006 but there will always be cheats.


I dont think he cheated. And even if he did who cares like the article sats everyone remembers Lance kicking ass over there.

You've either never followed the sport or you've got your head in the sand if you think that a clean cyclist could win the Tour de France 7 consecutive times while beating the best pro cyclists in the world who were all taking PEDs.

Of course no one wants to see a hero to millions have his name tarnished in such a manner. If you were innocent, worth millions of dollars and a renowned fighter, and you have the chance to finally go to court and challenge the evidence, wouldn't you want to clear your name and keep your titles? Surely he's faced tougher battles? Saving his foundation and reputation from further damage and receiving possible jail time is why he is waving the white flag, not because he is "fed up". He might have even got to keep 3 or 4 of his TDF titles if he agreed to go to court.

The UCI still won't strip him of his titles anyway until they have evidence. They are more reluctant than anyone to have all their dirty secrets revealed in all the TDF's, Veultas, Giros and other cycling events before 2006. The amount of Doctors, Team owners, Coaches, Lawyers that would face purgery charges would run into the thousands.
 
^that's a bad take, saying someone sucks or is a dick is not a good take

dude was trying to kick cancer's ass, of course he took some shit

i really don't even care, and i doubt lance does, my opinion on the guy in indifferent, don't give a shit enough about the sport and pretty sure he's not the only one or the first to make a huge push at fighting cancer

my teacher had cancer and was a huge fan of lance armstrong and went to one of his cancer support events after my teacher won some race.

and he was really shocked at the way he acted and how he just rushed the entire thing and it seemed like he just wanted to get out of there.

idk just my teachers words so i cant say from personal experience but he seemed pretty bummed out when he told the class the next day after he was such a huge fan of him.
 
weird i had a little difference experience with one of my professors freshman year of college

she was a cancer survivor and had met lance and practically committed her life to the whole livestrong community

i thought she was kind of a nutjob
 
suburu said:
You've either never followed the sport or you've got your head in the sand if you think that a clean cyclist could win the Tour de France 7 consecutive times while beating the best pro cyclists in the world who were all taking PEDs. .
What an ignorant thing to say.
 
^ I think its pretty spot on..... maybe a little hostile, but PEDs were rampant during that era of cycling.
 
Lance Armstrong Betting for Oprah Interview

opened at 3/1 but it's now 4/9 for LA to shed a few crocodile tears.

Put a euro on "I did not have sexual relations with that bike" @ 250/1?

"I'm high right now" @90/1 is most def worth a shot.


What a great idea! Let's get Oprah to interview Lance. The production company that owns The Oprah Winfrey Network just happens to be the Discovery Channel, the major team sponsor of Armstrong's team between 2004 and 2007. That's cool isn't it! 8(

200507-omag-lance-armstrong-220x312.jpg


BAK3z9YCEAEdnvR.jpg
 
Last edited:
I didn't care before, but soon as he said hes willing to testify?

HES A RAT PEOPLE.

Intimidates others into doing drugs with him; gets higher ups to contribute to his ring; gets found out and instead of taking the punishment (like most of us would) he RATS on those very same people he was in cahoots with for years.

Rat, rat, rat, rat, rat.
 
I didn't care before, but soon as he said hes willing to testify?

HES A RAT PEOPLE.

Intimidates others into doing drugs with him; gets higher ups to contribute to his ring; gets found out and instead of taking the punishment (like most of us would) he RATS on those very same people he was in cahoots with for years.

Rat, rat, rat, rat, rat.

They are all rats. If any of those who were involved were so highly moral, then why take part or stay silent so long? Answer, because winning is a rush and as long as they won, who cares. But once Landis became butthurt for getting caught, the whole thing unraveled. Dont just hate Armstrong, hate them all for tainting the sport.
 
It's all about the money.

Athletes want to get paid so they have to compete at a high level. They need an edge over the competition so they use drugs, transfusions, anything and everything they can to get ahead.

The media, leagues, teams, agents, coaches and companies marketing these athletes want to make money so they turn a blind eye to obvious signs that they are using "PEDs".

The dealers, 'trainers', and those coming up with these drugs, distributing them, administering them, etc. want to make money so they come up with newer, better drugs, ways to get around testing and around investigators.

The testing agencies want to continue their funding so they push these issues into the media spotlight, push for rules and legislation to make their testing increasingly frequent and invasive. They push for funding for research, monitoring, etc. etc. to keep their people working and to keep the testing and accountability agency growing.


And really, who gives a fuck? It's plain as day that professional athletes are using drugs to augment their stamina, strength, recovery, speed, flexibility, etc. etc. I train at a high level and have been for 12 years - 100% drug free - and I am no where near the strength level of these athletes. You cannot compete as a natural at any of these sports - absolutely no f'ing way. And there will always be some way to push the envelope and remain undetected. So there's a field full of juicers and all the naturals are handicapping themselves and never ever seeing the light of day in the pro-sports world. They won't get a payday, they'll be subpar, and will have squandered years of conditioning and training and hard ass work for what? They should just spend that time with their family and a career.

Entire thing is stupid but I guess the 1 take away is that it pushes more and more money into nutritional and health sciences at every possible level.

I still say he earns those wins in my eyes. He dominated that sport at a high level - juicing doesn't make it any easier when the field is all doing likewise. The level he was on to win those races is absurd and I commend him on reaching that level of physical dominance in a sport I can't even imagine participating in. Good job Lance.
 
@aanallein I agree with everything you said. Except for the fact that while yes, MANY cyclists were doping, there still are a few who were not! And those are the ones who TRULY have suffered because of this. That win they worked so hard for escaped them. The money (and security that comes with hit) escaped them. All because of other cheaters. Those people could have invested that and made a lot more, just like armstrong did.

While ALMOST everybody dopes in cycling (which is why its a joke), almost everybody is not everybody.

I agree in a sense with the fact that he still earns those wins. Its not like taking steroids magically makes you win the Tour De France. He still busted his ass working to get where he was. He still biked all those miles. Steroids didn't make his race any less long. But again, there were a few cyclists who followed the rules and did not dope. Again they are the ones who really suffered as a result.

I agree though, if youre an athlete? Your income is dependent on your physical form. So of cousre you're going to take something to enhance that. No different that students taking adderall, or pilots being given pills to keep them awake. I think years down the road steroids, and PED in general, will be integrated into sports in some fashion. After all they only became illegal in sports fairly recently (eg when Arnold was a body builder, he used them along with everyone else). Guess we'll see though.


@Wyld 4 x I'm hating him for being a rat. I'm not sitting here pretending anyone there is highly moral.

But there is a HUGE DIFFERENCE between coming forward because its the right thing to do, and coming forward because your feet are to the fire. Armstrong did the latter.

Everyone who does drugs knows that: you DONT RAT. Thats part of "the game," and i'm sure 99% of the people on this site feel that way too.
 
Last edited:
@Wyld 4 x I'm hating him for being a rat. I'm not sitting here pretending anyone there is highly moral.

But there is a HUGE DIFFERENCE between coming forward because its the right thing to do, and coming forward because your feet are to the fire. Armstrong did the latter.

Everyone who does drugs knows that: you DONT RAT. Thats part of "the game," and i'm sure 99% of the people on this site feel that way too.

Dude. All the guys who got busted played the deny game as long as they could. Did Floyd Landis disclose he cheated when reports first came out about him? Did Contador? Lance's former teammates?

Armstrong is the ring leader but I dont see him as the biggest rat in a sport filled with rats. None of them played the game.
 
Everyone else didn't go from being an average middle of the pack rider to a world beater overnight, smashing the specialists in the time trials, free-wheeling away from the climbers in the mountains, using the most sophisticated drugs ever used in Sport amassing a personal fortune of $100 million manipulating pretty much everyone along the way. Fact.

The greatest return since Lazurus/The biggest con in sporting history.
 
Top