Escher's Waterfall
Bluelight Crew
So how much of normal water is tritium anyways?
Why hasn't "Alternative Theories IV" been moved to the Archive yet?
No, not at all...everything is business as usual.Did i get too logical for you?
So how much of normal water is tritium anyways?
The quantity is so vanishingly small as to be meaningless.
60pCi/L is Normal Water;
3,530pCi/L is what was found in ground water directly below GZWTC.
An "official" study on the subject:
https://e-reports-ext.llnl.gov/pdf/241096.pdf
But, the problem with that is that Tritium is a gas - when exit signs etc. are broken, it floats away into the atmosphere where it will eventually combine with oxygen
Or, if its in a fire, it will burn. 2H2 + O2 -> 2H2O. That is, the result of hydrogen burning is water.
Now, was the world trade center on fire?
"It is important to compare this small release of tritium in the fire with two other incidents
caused by fire and involving the release of molecular tritium. One incident involved a fire
in a community building at Council, Alaska, on 9/6/87, where 12 RL light panels for
airport runway marking were stored, totaling 3000 Ci of tritium (39). It was a free-burning
fire, which consumed the building in 1 hr. Tritium assessment was done 11 days after the
accident. The remaining GTLS tubes were mostly undamaged but disfigured, indicating that
all tritium had escaped. No air-borne tritium was detected. All tubes were carefully wiped
on surfaces, and the HTO activity from the wipes amounted to 6.5×10-8 of that originally
present. No HTO was found in bioassay or environmental samples.
Another incident, involving containers with tens of thousands CI of
tritium, was a fire on a C-124 airplane on the ground at the Wright-Patterson Air Force
Base, Dayton, OH, on 10/12/65 (40). That fire was actively extinguished. Elevated levels of
HTO were found in bioassay samples, on emergency and fire equipment, clothing, in the
debris, as well as in the soil and water from nearby samples. In comparison with the Alaska
incident, the active fire fighting contributed to capture of some of the HTO on site.
Therefore in the situation at Council, Alaska, a small building containing 3000 Ci of tritium
(as opposed to 34 Ci in the WTC 767s) left no detectable trace of Tritium afterwards. It took
an aircraft fire with tens of thousands of Ci of T to leave detectable traces.
ink blot #432
![]()
Most people see a butterfly. MyFinalRest sees a controlled nuclear explosion carefully crafted by the Bilderbergs in cooperation with inter-dimensional aliens with telepathic powers with the sole intent of enslaving the human race.
diff'rent strokes
ink blot #432
![]()
Most people see a butterfly. MyFinalRest sees a controlled nuclear explosion carefully crafted by the Bilderbergs in cooperation with inter-dimensional aliens with telepathic powers with the sole intent of enslaving the human race.
diff'rent strokes
Here is another incident invlolving a military plane carrying "tens of thousands" CI of tritium in its cargo.
Escher, 911InsideJobbers are not fucking retards.
blah blah crazy shit blah![]()
and so on and i must have lost my meds etcetera
From what you quoted:
"Another incident, involving containers with tens of thousands CI of tritium, was a fire on a C-124 airplane on the ground at the Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Dayton, OH, on 10/12/65 (40). That fire was actively extinguished. Elevated levels of HTO were found in bioassay samples, on emergency and fire equipment, clothing, in the debris, as well as in the soil and water from nearby samples. In comparison with [a different fire], the active fire fighting contributed to capture of some of the HTO on site."
So was their active fire fighting at the WTC?
From what you quoted:
"Another incident, involving containers with tens of thousands CI of tritium, was a fire on a C-124 airplane on the ground at the Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Dayton, OH, on 10/12/65 (40). That fire was actively extinguished. Elevated levels of HTO were found in bioassay samples, on emergency and fire equipment, clothing, in the debris, as well as in the soil and water from nearby samples. In comparison with [a different fire], the active fire fighting contributed to capture of some of the HTO on site."
So was their active fire fighting at the WTC?
It took a while for the wtc plus it was many stories up - not allowing firemen to drive right up and hose it off. Just face it, that and other evidence is too strong to deny it. It certainly wasn't a kerosene job. You don't even have the balls to say anything about that strange crater or much of anything else. You are not going to win this argument. Sorry about your cushy little world of whole-hearted absolute trust in the government and people in general, but people tell lies, and the 911ArabJob was a big lie.was a fire on a C-124 airplane on the ground at the Wright-Patterson Air Force
Base, Dayton, OH, on 10/12/65 (40). That fire was actively extinguished.
Not before the tritium would have escaped or burned and evaporated. There was very little of it in the wtc's anyway - unlike the Alsaka fire or the military plane fire where both cases were either storing or transporting large quantities of products containing it.
Remember, it took a military plane that caught fire on the gorund at an Ohio airbase that was carrying "tens of thousands CI of it" that was immediately hosed off allowing it to be quickly washed all over the place. Firefighters were quickly on the scene there.