• Psychedelic Drugs Welcome Guest
    View threads about
    Posting RulesBluelight Rules
    PD's Best Threads Index
    Social ThreadSupport Bluelight
    Psychedelic Beginner's FAQ
  • PD Moderators: Esperighanto | JackARoe | Cheshire_Kat

"When you get the message, hang up the phone." And then pick it up again?

"When you get the message, hang up the phone."

This classic Alan Watts quote

perhaps he is talking about each individual trip. after u get that message, take an ambien and hang up the phone. lol probably not though.

more likely - by your interpretation yeah theres no use in looking for more than than one message. the messages i tend to get usually relate to my own psyche. what goes on in my head only changes every so often so i only feel a need to dose maybe once a year (acid). new years is a good day to reflect on the past year... if the message is refering to the workings of the universe, ya after you've taken the drug 100 times you're bound to get the message. hang up the phone and move on to another psychedelic which will hold a different message. there's always taking the drug for pleasure and not to look for a message so u dont absolutely have to put down the phone if you've recieved every message, because u may enjoy listening to whoever is sending it, even if they are a broken record.
 
I think I disagree even more with the full statement. It's an idea that was popular in the 60s - "Psychedelics can only give you a glimpse, to get the real experience you have to become a hindu or a buddhist" - the whole essence of Ram Dass's argument. I've never liked the comparison of psychedelics and man-made religions like Hinduism. I don't think they give you the same thing - particularly if you're non-religious and don't want to follow a bloke with a beard.

Psychedelics are their own path and they deserve their own dignity. They arn't just some "shortcut" or "glimpse" of some bullshit man-made religion. For many of us, they're the only true spirituality we'll ever experience.
Becoming a Buddhist, a real fucking Buddhist, does do something, apparently. For instance, "long-term Buddhist practitioners self-induce sustained electroencephalographic high-amplitude gamma-band oscillations and phase-synchrony during meditation." This measurement differs radically from controls, so meditation as guided by the scriptures of those bearded guys does something, something that I highly respect. But psychedelics also produce brain changes. I'm wondering what the result would be if psychedelics were used with the same discipline that these people have. Imagine that a great egoic sculptor, who could only chip away at marble with his finger nails, was given a Black and Decker multi-power-tool kit. What sort of experiences could they engender, how many different versions of "nothingness" could they conjure?
 
hello-yes-this-is-dog.png
 
haha this made me :D

when i was growing up i had a dog that was a spitting image, she was better at telepathy than talking on the phone though.
 
I think there should have been more emphasis on the word "THE" before message. I think he's talking about the inherent search for answers many of us are on when we decide to meditate, indulge in drugs, seek out gurus, read philosophical works etc..

We go out seeking this answer, and many of us end up finding that it was there all along, but a lot of us fall into the trap of seeking the answer over and over again as if it will somehow change or be different next time.

I did something similar when battling my social anxiety. When I realised how severe it was I had a rather difficult trip on 4-AcO-DMT, it showed me my flaws and that I needed to fight my anxiety.

So, did I go out and fight my anxiety? No, I tripped week after week in the same conditions on the same substance at the same dose, relived the same difficult trips over and over again, expecting one day to be miraculously cured.

As Einstein said, "Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results".

In the end it was psychedelics that played a major role in curing my anxiety for good, but it was coupled with a new fresh environment, and the help of my best friend as a guide - trying something new finally broke the cycle and managed to defeat the problems, but had I not "hung up the phone" on my old ways I'd be stuck in a loop. :)
 
Becoming a Buddhist, a real fucking Buddhist, does do something, apparently. For instance, "long-term Buddhist practitioners self-induce sustained electroencephalographic high-amplitude gamma-band oscillations and phase-synchrony during meditation." This measurement differs radically from controls, so meditation as guided by the scriptures of those bearded guys does something, something that I highly respect.

It's definitely true that years of Buddhist practice can change the way your brain functions, but it's unclear to me that these changes are for the better unless you interpret them within the framework of Buddhist cosmology, suffering, enlightenment, blah, blah, blah. In fact, as seen by an outside observer with a different model of reality, they may simply be a way to isolate yourself from the bedrock of human experience and slowly drive yourself mad. What is there to respect here?
 
^Exactly the same argument can be made against psychedelics. (The socially awkward hippy.)
And exactly the same argument can be made against sober (or drunk) life in the West. (The alienation argument.)

Like Watts himself would say, judge and advocate are one and the same here. You accuse the Buddhist experience for needing the congruent frame of reference, as if you're not implicitly utilizing your own.
 
What all this boils down to for me is that all it really is, is an escape from everyday reality and having a blast at the same time.
That's what I have learned.
I have also learned that the brain and the world around us is even more mysterious than we think.
I have also learned that people who've never done psychedelics should do LSD at least once in their life, it could change humanity for the better.
 
Becoming a Buddhist, a real fucking Buddhist, does do something, apparently

If so then God bless em. If anyone can get anything out of growing a funky beard and walking round in a robe chanting "Om" then I'm all for em. Really groovy, outta sight.

But the one, the ONLY one, that works for me is psychedelics. The thing I don't like is you tend to get a lot of snotty Buddhists saying "Oh dude, psychedelics are only temporary, buddhism is like permanent brah". As if Buddhism and Hinduism are somehow "superior" to psychedelics. No they arn't - they're inferior. Vastly, vastly inferior.

Been reading "The Harvard Psychedelic Club" - apparantly when Ram Dass was banging on about the eternal peace he'd achieved through his Hindu master he was cottaging men in public toilets and living a life of eternal guilt and torment that he couldn't overcome his desire to plate half a dozen strangers cocks every night. Perhaps if he'd stuck to the psychedelics instead of following the "superior" Hinduism he might've found more peace of mind and acceptance of himself.
 
Last edited:
^Exactly the same argument can be made against psychedelics. (The socially awkward hippy.)
And exactly the same argument can be made against sober (or drunk) life in the West. (The alienation argument.)

Like Watts himself would say, judge and advocate are one and the same here. You accuse the Buddhist experience for needing the congruent frame of reference, as if you're not implicitly utilizing your own.

True, but you don't tend to get many psychedelic users standing up for psychedelics. Ever since the 60s the psychedelic user has been beaten down as being "just for kicks", "not as good as meditating", "you can only get there really by studying Baba Rama Ding Dong".

If you read the book "zig zag zen buddhism and psychedelics" you get page after page of buddhists saying psychedelics are a waste of time and only "prepare" you for studying the way of the Buddha. I think it's time for psychedelic users to get off their knees and start realising their way is superior to Buddhism and all the rest.
 
^ lol! Psychedelics revolution! Viva la psychedelica!

I feel ya though....though I do see some value to a path to "enlightenment" outside of tripping, like meditation.
While the realizations can be the same undoubtedly, there's something to be said of the way ones life develops through the different routes. One who practices transcendence only when tripping would likely be less apt to carry compassion in their daily life than one who spends a large amount of their waking time focusing on the refining of their intentions, their path to growth and harmony etc.

I wouldn't say either is superior personally, but you make a good point ismene, it is bs that psychedelics are looked at as so far inferior. I think your view on psychedelics being superior deserves respect as well...i think the main stream looking down on it comes not only from the sigma of drug use, but also because of the way our world looks at religionand spirituality as a whole. Always seems that to be devout now a days you've gotta sign on the doted line...promising to abide by certain stipulations, which mind alteration is always up there on the no no list. Doctrine...sigh

I digg the idea of abstaining from alteration as an approach to enlightenment, but the idea of eating plants which induce spiritual states seems equally as "natural"I'd say...
 
Well I want to know what you think: Do we only get one message?

My understanding of that quote is when you realize there is no answer and nothing to understand, what your looking for is unfolding within each and every moment.

You see yourself in everything and everyone, you start to understand how everything is part of an integral system; theres quite literally nothing to do; all resistance is a means of perpetuating the illusion of self.

The fundamental issue here is the thought or belief that there is somewhere to go, a place to 'get to'; the joke is realizing that your already there which is what I feel he was conveying with the quote.
 
Ismene said:
But the one, the ONLY one, that works for me is psychedelics. The thing I don't like is you tend to get a lot of snotty Buddhists saying "Oh dude, psychedelics are only temporary, buddhism is like permanent brah". As if Buddhism and Hinduism are somehow "superior" to psychedelics. No they arn't - they're inferior. Vastly, vastly inferior.
It's definitely true that years of Buddhist practice can change the way your brain functions, but it's unclear to me that these changes are for the better unless you interpret them within the framework of Buddhist cosmology, suffering, enlightenment, blah, blah, blah. In fact, as seen by an outside observer with a different model of reality, they may simply be a way to isolate yourself from the bedrock of human experience and slowly drive yourself mad. What is there to respect here?
folding space: If your interpretation was all there was to what I was saying I respected, not much I guess. I don't have any evidence to suggest the way you indicate is how the particular individuals in the study did what they did or not. Somehow I doubt these particular meditators are of the "snotty" type that Ismene mentions who say "Oh dude, psychedelics are only temporary, buddhism is like permanent brah."

The study investigated long-term practitioners of ‘open monitoring meditation’, a meditation practice which in many ways is a form of metacognition: the objective is not to focus one’s attention but rather to use one’s brain to monitor mental experience without directing attention to any one task. In many ways this sort of activity strongly resembles what people value the psychedelic state for enabling: a sense of the free flow of thoughts and heightened self-awareness. The EEGs of long-term meditators exhibited much more gamma-synchrony than that of naive meditators (presumably these naive meditators are more likely to be the snotty type). Moreover, normally human brains produce only short bursts of gamma-synchrony. The long-term meditators were able to produce sustained gamma-activity in a manner that had never previously been observed in any other human. Achieving subjective states that are novel, intriguing and expand achievement on the more uniquely human levels of our being such as self-awareness and meta cognition is what I'm into psychedelics for (unlike pushing the limits of physical strength/speed/stamina, an area in which other living beings far exceed us in prowess, yet that are popularly admired disproportionally to what I speak of [see sports figure worship]). These practitioners measurably achieved that by doing what has not been observed in any other humans. That's what I respect.

I also practice what I call random involuntary memory evocation while sober, and try to cultivate this ability in order to better understand and monitor subconscious processes and how they affect the way I think consciously. I do this in order to better understand and control my conscious thoughts and emotions, which are partially structured by involuntary memories. It sounds a lot like 'open monitoring meditation.' It's a mind state where I (ironically) voluntarily enter a state where I experience a high frequency of involuntary memories I've never experienced before that seem to be largely independent of each other (seem to belong to different semantic association groupings). According to Involuntary Memory: Concept and Theory I naturally experience a far higher frequency of involuntary memories than normal, even when not attempting to. Here's why it's relevant to psychedelics: I didn't start experiencing them at this frequency, nor was I able to will myself into a state that made them more prevalent, until after using IM psilocin and ketamine in a semi-disciplined way for over a year.

I learned it beginning with the experience detailed in the Erowid report of mine this quote describing the state is from:
From here I find myself ... hurled through various channels of my life’s experience with a speed exceeding some definite but unknown limit. But I never feel confined to just one channel. It’s as though I am looking into a single facet of a prism, with my immediate experience playing out in the largest and most central frame of the kaleidoscopic scene but with innumerable other experiences of my life felt flitting like flames around its edges. Everything is so present, so clear.

Like before, when the memory of falling and gripping the root on the island during a summer kayaking trip was followed subsequently by falling from my skis and into snow, the channels of my memories remain networked through associationistic nodes.

A string of prayer flags snapping in the wind over a Nepalese mountain expanse becomes psychedelically spliced into the cable line of a tramcar leading down from Rio de Janeiro’s Sugar Loaf peak. A tunnel maze beneath the floor at Chuck E. Cheese’s I crawled through during a childhood friend’s birthday party opens out into a blizzard-battered night framed by the mouth of a snow tunnel dug out at age nine along my parent’s street.

I travel between waking life memories and memories of dreams thought forgotten forever with equal facility. In this world constructed of life experiences and held together by associations, dreams bear loads as heavy as those from waking life.
I hope it's evident from the above how the phenomena described in this psychedelic experience is related to what I'm speaking of, even though these memories hold much stronger semantic associations with each other than to those involuntary memories I've described that the sober practice has since developed to evoke. So, as I've attempted to illustrate, I have spent a long time using psychedelics to train my mind to do something sober that seems very similar to what these meditators do with their practice, and they've also achieved something similar with meditation to what I desire to achieve with semi-focused use of psychedelics (achieving novel and intriguing subjective states -- I mean philosophically and psychologically intriguing on a more formal intellectual level, not just "intense" experiences. I've been at this shit for over 15 years and I've had plenty of the latter and not nearly so many of the former)). So that's a further more personal reason why I respect them, not because they "simply isolate themselves from the bedrock of human experience and slowly drive themselves mad."
 
Last edited:
^Exactly the same argument can be made against psychedelics. (The socially awkward hippy.)
And exactly the same argument can be made against sober (or drunk) life in the West. (The alienation argument.)

Like Watts himself would say, judge and advocate are one and the same here. You accuse the Buddhist experience for needing the congruent frame of reference, as if you're not implicitly utilizing your own.
Of course some sort of reference frame is needed to understand and evaluate anything. This is why I started my second sentence with the phrase "as seen by an outside observer with a different model of reality." My point was merely that the scientific evidence around changes in brain structure can only be interepreted as being worthy of respect or interest if you buy into the Buddhist model of reality, which I think is patently ridiculous. In any event, it's a moot point because psood0nym highlighted another, completely different way to understand these findings.
 
My understanding of that quote is when you realize there is no answer and nothing to understand, what your looking for is unfolding within each and every moment.

You see yourself in everything and everyone, you start to understand how everything is part of an integral system; theres quite literally nothing to do; all resistance is a means of perpetuating the illusion of self.

The fundamental issue here is the thought or belief that there is somewhere to go, a place to 'get to'; the joke is realizing that your already there which is what I feel he was conveying with the quote.

good post!! the old cosmic joke, how does it go again? i used to have it pasted on my fridge :)
 
You'd be surprised.
Well, the one with the highest measured levels of gamma-synchrony out of all of those tested is Matthieu Ricard - Molecular geneticist, son of famous French Resistance philosopher Jean-François Revel, and recipient of the National Order of Merit for donating the money from his best selling books on happiness to fund schools in poverty stricken areas of SE Asia. If in truth he uses all that as a thin facade to cover the fact that he's really a superior and disingenuous coffee shop dwelling egoist lacking in personal breadth who's prone to denouncing psychedelics as an inferior path and saying things like "get on Buddhism, it's the only true way brah," I would be surprised, indeed.
 
Last edited:
Why would giving money to the poor imply you thought psychedelics were as good as Buddhism? Why would writing a book on "happiness" mean you thought psychedelics were as valid as Buddhism?

Perhaps it might be better actually finding one member of your study who says "psychedelics are as good as Buddhism" before you run away with yourself on this.
 
This whole discussion on which is more superior is hilarious, do go on.... :)
 
I don't think he said "If you get the message, light the phone on fire and rip the cord out of the wall".

The full quote is thus:

"Psychedelic experience is only a glimpse of genuine mystical insight, but a glimpse which can be matured and deepened by the various ways of meditation in which drugs are no longer necessary or useful. If you get the message, hang up the phone. For psychedelic drugs are simply instruments, like microscopes, telescopes, and telephones. The biologist does not sit with eye permanently glued to the microscope, he goes away and works on what he has seen..."

He is emphasizing the importance of sober meditation and introspection.

Thats from his autobio? This puts it into a clear context. Thanks!
 
Top