The idea is that the economy is supported by research chemicals, not that everyone would have to be stoned or high on them all the time. Seems like an uber-socially liberal place with a big focus on the industry of biochemistry (namely RCs). It would attract people who just wanna get high all the time, but for the purpose of imagining the idea working, it would have to attract some scientists who are developing new chemicals too.
Pans out like a city-state basically made up of some laboratories and resorts for tourists. It doesn't sound wholly dystopian to me.
Sounds like a homoerotic paradise.
I'm in!
That was my first idea as well. But if I've got unlimited access to every benzo and opiate I desire at any time, I might not really care.
I'd probably just buy a house (or appartment) there and live like a hermit so I wouldn't have to deal with all the other druggies, and so high all the time that I even have enough patience to deal with all kinds of druggiez whenever I need to go to the store to buy my next heap of opiates. :D
Nah, Srsly though, I wouldn't wanna live there. Also sounds like it would be a disaster socially. It'd probably be poorly maintained and going to Shit within 1 week as well (unless maybe the meth users do all the handiwork & the cleaning for everyone etc etc hehe)
I would however definitely like to go on vacation there sometime, but I'd bring friends (either online friends or friends that I already know irl, in ant case people I know are cool, whether they are on drugs or not doesn't matter)
It sounds nice at first but once you start picturing it, it's not very pretty.
Great. Please keep checking back and give us suggestions and spread the wordHehe
Honestly the emphasis on males only getting rights put me off right at the beginning, even though I see you've edited it out now. Worried pregnant females will mess it up? Deal with that on a case-by-case basis. It came off as pretty anti-woman since you felt it necessary to mention it twice in a short OP and didn't explain it like you did when people reacted to it... it makes me think you're trolling. Anyway, interesting thought experiment. I think that we should be free to do any drug we choose as a basic human right, but to gather together only all of the people who want drugs to be legal is probably asking for trouble. You're gonna get the good and the bad, and no one is going to want to be the police, but you're going to have crime and shit you need to police. Additionally most foreign governments would place serious sanctions on you if not outright invade, because freedom of drug use contradicts the global drug war which most of them support to some extent for financial reasons or because they themselves are afraid of sanctions by those who are benefiting financially.
There would have to be sober people slaves to actually do shit around the place. We would be too fucked up to be of much use.
Since this has come up a few times in this thread...I don't believe that people should be free to do any drug they choose. Imagine the dumbest most reckless crackheads you've come accross in life, now imagine them having pure 3meoPcp and doing cocaine sized lines. Imagine them having them having pure fentanyl.
All drugs should be legal for those they are "prescribed" for. It would be more of a licence rather that a script though. Being licensed to used a specific drug would involve a variety of tests, psychological, it would look at criminal histroy also...if you are violent you cant have PCP etc.
if you are a heroin addict already, you can have a heroin licence.
While I think most people that frequent this board are responsible with drugs, there are many people that in the general population that are not. Getting licences may require some sort of "drug education" and continuing education. And if you get caught driving on high doses of LSD you lose your licences. If you are benzoed out and end up breaking into someones house and raping their daughter you lose your licence..etc
You can't just release ultra mind bending drugs on the entire population and expect it to be ok.
"Lord of the Flies on NBOMe" hahahahaha Thought about that story yesterday. idk, why MALES only again??? People can say you can't do whatever to try to stop citizens of every country but there will always be people who are able and willing to make RC's.
If I move there then my neighbors would likely complain about the sperm like smell constantly coming from my house...
Well at least the tourism market would be booming, I'm sure there would be plenty of people eager to go somewhere where they can use drugs without legal consequence.
Sounds like a good recipe for hyper-inflation, famine, mass starvation.
How will you fund a health system? High taxes?
Will these "RCs" be tested for safety before being sold to the population?
Why not pursue a reformist agenda in an existing country?
How do you expect these 3 countries to give up their sovereignty without "raising an eyebrow"?
Why Haiti, Greenland, Iceland?
What do these countries have in common, from your perspective?