• DPMC Moderators: thegreenhand | tryptakid
  • Drug Policy & Media Coverage Welcome Guest
    View threads about
    Posting Rules Bluelight Rules
    Drug Busts Megathread Video Megathread

Canada: Get-tough plan on drugs doomed

retired_chemist

Bluelighter
Joined
Aug 5, 2007
Messages
365
OTTAWA - Health Minister Tony Clement will announce the Conservative government's anti-drug strategy this week with a stark warning: "the party's over" for illicit drug users.

"In the next few days, we're going to be back in the business of an anti-drug strategy," Clement told The Canadian Press.

"In that sense, the party's over."

Shortly after taking office early last year, the Conservatives decided not to go ahead with a Liberal bill to decriminalize small amounts of marijuana.

Since then, the number of people arrested for smoking pot has jumped dramatically in several Canadian cities, in some cases jumping by more than one third.

Toronto, Vancouver, Ottawa and Halifax all reported increases of between 20 and 50 per cent in 2006 of arrests for possession of cannabis, compared with the previous year.

As a result thousands of people were charged with a criminal offence that, under the previous Liberal government, was on the verge of being classified as a misdemeanour.

Police forces said many young people were under the impression that the decriminalization bill had already passed and were smoking up more boldly than they've ever done before.

Clement says his government wants to clear up the uncertainty

"There's been a lot of mixed messages going out about illicit drugs," Clement said in an interview Saturday after a symposium designed to bring together Canada's arts and health communities to combat mental health issues.

There's also a health-care cost element to suggesting to young people that using illicit drugs is OK, the minister said.

"The fact of the matter is they're unhealthy," Clement said.

"They create poor health outcomes."

For too long, Clement argues, governments in Canada have been sending the wrong message about drug use. It's time, he says, to take a tougher approach to dealing with the problem.

"There hasn't been a meaningful retooling of our strategy to tackle illicit drugs in over 20 years in this country," Clement said.

"We're going to be into a different world and take tackling these issues very seriously because (of) the impact on the health and safety of our kids."

The Conservatives' wide-ranging $64 million anti-drug strategy is expected to combine treatment and prevention programs with stiffer penalties for illicit drug use, and a crackdown at the border against drug smuggling.

Justice Minister Rob Nicholson and Public Safety Minister Stockwell Day will join Clement in announcing the plan as part of a range of initiatives to be unveiled by the Tories surrounding next month's throne speech.

Clement said treatment and prevention programs were his key priorities for the health element of the drug strategy.

"Yes, there's a justice issue to that," he said.

"But there's also a treatment issue, there's also a prevention issue."

Clement has suggested in the past that he opposes so-called harm reduction strategies for combating illegal drug use, including safe-injection sites where nurses provide addicts with clean needles and a safe place to use drugs.

At a Canadian Medical Association meeting last month, he was quoted saying "harm reduction, in a sense, takes many forms. To me, prevention is harm reduction. Treatment is harm reduction. Enforcement is harm reduction."

The following day, a petition signed by over 130 physicians and scientists was released, condemning the Conservative government's "potentially deadly" misrepresentation of the positive evidence for harm reduction programs.

Vancouver's Insite safe injection clinic is facing a December 31 deadline for the renewal of a federal exemption that allows it to operate.

Critics of the Conservative government's approach to illicit drug use say the federal government would be making a serious mistake by failing to renew the exemption.

"I think there's very little chance that Mr. Clement will extend the safe injection site's permit to continue," says Dr. Keith Martin, a British Columbia Liberal MP and former substance-abuse physician.

"But in doing that they will be essentially committing murder."

Advocates say safe-injection sites help to prevent the spread of serious diseases, including AIDS and Hepatitis by preventing users from sharing needles while opponents say the sites simply promote illegal drug use.

Martin says he's all for increasing penalties for people who sell illegal drugs, including gangsters, but wonders why the Tories would want to target users when he says similar strategies in other countries haven't worked.

"I can't understand why the Conservatives are embracing a war-on-drugs approach that has proven to fail," he said.

"By all means, go after the pushers. By all means, absolutely go after the organized crime gangs that are the real parasites in this situation," he added.

"But for heaven's sake, treat the user as a medical problem and adopt the solutions that have proven to work in other countries."
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

http://www.edmontonsun.com/News/Canada/2007/09/29/4536778.html

http://canadianpress.google.com/article/ALeqM5gF-kzbNMlnFDDUvS4g21o5Ak6H4g

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Harper government to unveil get-tough national drug strategy
1 day ago (Sept 29, 2007)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Good to see they're paying attention to the success's other countries have had with a hard-line stance against drugs.
 
"I think there's very little chance that Mr. Clement will extend the safe injection site's permit to continue," says Dr. Keith Martin, a British Columbia Liberal MP and former substance-abuse physician.

"But in doing that they will be essentially committing murder."

Essentially committing murder is a bit of a stretch. But it's nice to see that the other side is using exaggeration to get their points across. 8)
 
What the fuck is wrong with the world? How did all these "conservatives" get into power in the US, AU, CA, NL, FR, etc. at the same time?
 
lol I wouldnt be too worried, at least about the maryjane

ive smoked up infront of officers before, ive admitted to having bags of weed on me, etc. all the officers said "oh I dont care about that", and things will stay that way, at least in BC. If the street level officers dont care to arrest somone for smoking weed or posessing small amounts, a governmental change isnt going to make a difference, the arresting officers are the ones who decide wether your going to be hauled in or not, not some conservative douchebag in power.

additionally, the government will quickly be reminded as to why they wanted to decriminalize in the first place. Because the court systems were unbelievably backed up with charges for very minor marijuana offenses. This will happen again, and eventually, theyre going to have to cut the cord again or have to wait 10 years to get somone into court for posessing a couple grams of weed.
 
bagera tomorrow said:
Good to see they're paying attention to the success's other countries have had with a hard-line stance against drugs.
Yep, we're all happy and healthy here in Amerika, and it's good to see that someone wants to keep Kanada from going down the tubes...
 
Thats utter bullshit!!!!!!
to say i taught we were on the good direction!!! ARGGGGGGHHHHH

i would walk on the busiest street downtown(+1million folks in the city) smoking joints and stopping at the most popular subway station to roll my spliff! and now ill have to hide?? :(
 
"In the next few days, we're going to be back in the business of an anti-drug strategy"

That statement says it all right there. There's good money in that drug war business.


ive smoked up infront of officers before, ive admitted to having bags of weed on me, etc. all the officers said "oh I dont care about that", and things will stay that way

Don't be so sure about that. Look at the situation in the US, California and New Mexico for example. The DEA busted down the door of a freaking paraplegic! It's absurd. I'm sure the Canadian government can apply legal and other types of pressure (withhold funding, etc.) to BC too. And then there's the issue of all the propaganda that they'll be pumping out.
 
And the massive funding carrot that they'll be dangling over the heads of local law enforcement to get the local law enforcement agencies to increase the number of drug busts. That's how this shit works in the USA, the local cops join the fight because they get more money for active participation.
 
I wouldnt worry too much they have a minority government which means if they get too far out of line there party will be over =D . In any case if we as a country have any sense there party will be over in the next election. Harper is a right wing nut job and is trying to turn canada into the opposite of what canada is supposed to be.

That cunt is worse then Bush he just doesn't have the same power. Thank fuck for that one.
 
There will always be opposition as a nation develops enlightened drug policies.

Unless that nation concurrently resolves its other problems, this opposition will point to drugs as the cause of them.
 
Coolio said:
What the fuck is wrong with the world? How did all these "conservatives" get into power in the US, AU, CA, NL, FR, etc. at the same time?

The universe is balance, ying and yang, push and pull and all that shit.

To rebel against conservative parents their kids turn liberal, to rebel against their liberal parents kids turn conservative.

Every movement has a backlash, and every generation forgets how bad things were before and yearns for the past.

Look at China and alcohol, they have had alternating centuries of it being illegal and legal again for thousands of years.

But then again definitions change too, now if you don't provide free needles and injection sites you're a murderer? Yayy for hyperbole!
 
Canada: Get-tough plan on drugs doomed, experts say

Canada's war on drugs is about to escalate. But as the federal Conservative governments prepares to unveil a new strategy that cracks down on illicit drug users, critics say they are ignoring a mountain of research that shows the get-tough approach doesn't work.

“This is a failed approach. The experiment is done. The science is in,” says Thomas Kerr, a researcher at the University of British Columbia and member of the university's faculty of medicine.

The $64-million anti-drug strategy, to be announced in the next few days, is expected to include stiffer penalties for drug offenders and more money to stop drugs getting across the border. There will also be a massive campaign to warn young people not to use drugs.

It is not expected, says Liberal MP Keith Martin, to include money for what experts call “harm reduction.” These are programs such as Vancouver's controversial safe injection site, where heroin addicts can shoot up in a sterilized, supervised setting

The idea behind harm reduction is to reduce the health effects of drug use without requiring people to beat their addiction. Experts compare it with smokers using a nicotine patch; people still get their fix, but it is vastly preferable to smoking a pack a day.

A study published by Dr. Kerr and his colleagues last year found that the Vancouver supervised injection site, known as Insite, reduced the risk of overdoses and encouraged more users to seek treatment. It did not increase crime in the neighbourhood, nor lead to increased drug use.

But Prime Minister Stephen Harper has said he does not think the site should receive federal health money, and Health Canada must make a decision about the future of Insite by the end of the year.

Dr. Martin, a physician from British Columbia, says the Conservatives' approach is a triumph of “ideology over science.” While he supports more money for police to go after drug dealers or organized crime, Dr. Martin says substance abuse needs to be treated as a medical problem, not a moral one.

That's the approach taken in many European countries that have much lower rates of illicit drug use than Canada, he said.

Erik Waddell, a spokesman for Health Minister Tony Clement, said yesterday that the minister was travelling and would not be available for an interview.

Mr. Waddell said he couldn't discuss the details of the new strategy either. But earlier this year, he told The Globe and Mail that the Conservatives disagreed with the Liberals' approach. “In every poll, when Canadians are asked whether they want more law enforcement or less, they want more. So the bottom line is that Canada's new government will be taking a different approach.”

The Liberals had put forward a bill to decriminalize the possession of small amounts of marijuana, but the Conservatives did not reintroduce it after taking office in early 2006.

But the Liberals were also harshly criticized – by academics, doctors and the federal auditor-general – for focusing too much on enforcement.

The current drug strategy, which was renewed in 2003, devotes almost three- quarters of its resources to enforcement. Only 3 per cent of the annual $245-million goes to prevention, and another 3 per cent to harm reduction.

Barney Savage, director of public policy at the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health in Toronto, says law enforcement is extremely important, but so is prevention, treatment and harm reduction. “You have to balance the law enforcement perspective with the health perspective.”

The Canadian Association of Chiefs of Police also advocates a balanced approach in dealing with drug abuse and addiction issues.

----------------------------------------------------------
Get-tough plan on drugs doomed, experts say
ANNE MCILROY

From Monday's Globe and Mail
October 1, 2007 at 12:28 AM EDT

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20071001.wdrug1001/BNStory/National/
 
I think the "progressive" conservative pary of Canada decidd to drop the "progressive" part of their official name (really) after realizing that they are decidedly regressive.
 
Coolio said:
What the fuck is wrong with the world? How did all these "conservatives" get into power in the US, AU, CA, NL, FR, etc. at the same time?

How ? They promise little bribes to mere peasants during an election (oh here here , here's your $100/month bribe for every child in your family), while plotting how to fuck up a country and sell off it's assets to big corporations when they get into power. Welcome to Global Economy 101.

:p

This is shameful to say the least, the saddest part is that *joe the voter* will support this. ( just read some comments here: http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20071001.wdrug1001/CommentStory/National/ )
 
Last edited:
paranoid android said:
I wouldnt worry too much they have a minority government which means if they get too far out of line there party will be over =D .
yup yup!
the bloc is there and ready to have harper fall!!!!
and soon well rise as a nation!!
=D
 
Too bad the ontario election on october 10th couldnt be federal!

I wouldnt be too worried about this from an individual point of view, but as a whole conservatives have endangered the many harmless tokers.
 
Coolio said:
What the fuck is wrong with the world? How did all these "conservatives" get into power in the US, AU, CA, NL, FR, etc. at the same time?
organized religion
 
Top