• N&PD Moderators: Skorpio | thegreenhand

Zolantidine

polymath

Bluelight Crew
Joined
Nov 4, 2010
Messages
1,884
I was looking for information about whether the place preference inducing effect of H1 blockers happens because of potentiation of your own endorphins in the brain, when I stumbled upon some articles about the CNS active H2 blocker zolantidine.

We recently demonstrated that some H-antagonists have cocaine or methamphetamine-like discriminative stimulus effects. In the present study, the effects of optical isomers of chlorpheniramine (D-, L- and DL-forms) on the discriminative stimulus effects of cocaine and methamphetamine were examined in rats trained to discriminate between cocaine (10.0mg/kg) or methamphetamine (1.0 mg/kg) and saline, to determine whether these effects of H1-antagonists are mediated by the blockade of H-receptors. In generalization tests with optical isomers of chlorpheniramine, the D-, L- and DL-forms all completely generalized to the discriminative stimulus effects of cocaine, but did not generalize to those of methamphetamine. Dose-generalization by the optical isomers of chlorpheniramine to the discriminative stimulus effects of cocaine did not correlate with the H-antagonistic potency of these drugs. These results suggest that all of the optical isomers of chlorpheniramine have cocaine-like discriminative stimulus effects, but that these effects are not mediated by H1-receptor blockade. On the other hand, the H2-antagonist, zolantidine, generalized to the discriminative stimulus effects of methamphetamine, but not to those of cocaine, suggesting that zolantidine may have methamphetamine-like discriminative stimulus effects. In the present study, GBR12909 (dopamine uptake inhibitor) completely generalized to the discriminative stimulus effects of cocaine, but not to those of methamphetamine, whereas apomorphine (dopamine receptor agonist) generalized more potently to the discriminative stimulus effects of methamphetamine than to those of cocaine. These findings imply that although the dopaminergic system plays an important role in the discriminative stimulus effects of both cocaine and methamphetamine, there may be differences between their effects.

The effects of an H2 receptor antagonist, a histidine decarboxylase inhibitor and a histamine precursor on the morphine-induced place preference in mice were examined. Morphine (1-7 mg/kg) produced a place preference in a dose-dependent manner. This morphine-induced place preference was significantly antagonized by the dopamine (DA) D1 receptor antagonist SCH 23390. The histamine precursor, L-histidine, attenuated the morphine (7 mg/kg)-induced place preference. On the other hand, the histidine decarboxylase inhibitor, alpha-fluoromethylhistidine (alpha-FMH), significantly potentiated the morphine (1 mg/kg)-induced place preference. This potentiation was antagonized by SCH 23390. The H2 receptor antagonist zolantidine (0.3 mg/kg) significantly potentiated the morphine-induced place preference. Surprisingly, zolantidine (1 mg/kg) alone also produced a significant place preference. The zolantidine-induced place preference was antagonized by SCH 23390. In addition, zolantidine (1, 3 and 10 mg/kg) significantly increased DA turnover (DA ratio) in the limbic forebrain (nucleus accumbens and olfactory tubercle), implying that zolantidine may activate the mesolimbic DA system. Moreover, co-administration of zolantidine dose-dependently increased morphine (10 mg/kg)-induced DA turnover in the limbic forebrain. These results suggest that the activation of histaminergic neurons may attenuate the rewarding effect of morphine, while the inhibition of histaminergic neurons may potentiate the rewarding effect of morphine. Furthermore, potentiation of the morphine-induced rewarding effect by inhibition of histaminergic neurons may be mediated by D1 receptors. We also demonstrated that the H2 receptor antagonist zolantidine may activate the mesolimbic DA system, and as a result, zolantidine itself produces a rewarding effect and potentiates the morphine-induced rewarding effect.

390px-Zolantidine.svg.png


Has this ever been available as an OTC or prescription medication, or even tested on humans? It's not very clear whether the euphoric effect of this compound is any better than that of tripelennamine-like H1 blockers, but at least it probably doesn't have the sedative and performance-impairing side effects.
 
Looks like that could be a direct dopamine receptor ligand, meaning that it could cause nausea in humans. Roxatidine seems to be the most similar of other H2 antagonists.
 
As MDMA has been known to cause acid reflux when taken orally this could be a good one!

Although non-academic, may D1, 5HT6, oxytocin and D2 agonism aling with H3, CB1 CB2 antagonism play a role in its pleasurable effect?
 
Last edited:
Top